Navigation of artificial disc replacement: Evaluation in a cadaver study

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 28-36

  Kafchitsas, Konstantinos ^a   Rauschmann, Michael ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Image guided surgery; Navigation; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PEROPERATIVE CARE; RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE FUSION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CADAVER; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPINAL FUSION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 77950616765     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10929080903016177     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001;26(23):2521-2532; discussion 2532-12524
2. Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, McAfee P. General principles of total disc replacement arthroplasty: seventeen cases in a nonhuman primate model. Spine 2003;28(20):S118-S124.
3. Bü ttner-Janz K, Hochshuler S, McAfee P. The Artificial Disk. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2003.
4. Link H. History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc. Eur Spine J 2002;11(Suppl 2):S98-S105.
5. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996;21(8):995-1000.
6. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Templier A, Mendes F, Diop A, Sauty V, Laloux E. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;(337):64-76.
7. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, Shucosky EM. Cunningham BW. SB Charité disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16(4):424-433.
8. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, Verhaegen MJ. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999;8(3):210-217.
9. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, Dmietriev A, Maxwell JH, Regan JJ, Isaza J. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. Part II. Evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30(14) discussion E1388-E1590.
10. David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITÉ artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 2007;32(6):661-666.
11. Bü ttner-Janz K. Optimal minimally traumatic approach for the SB Charité Artificial Disc. Eur Spine J 2002;11(Suppl 2): S111-S114.
12. Bü ttner-Janz K, Hahn S, Schikora K, Link H. [asic principles of successful implantation of the SB Charité model LINK intervertebral disk endoprosthesis. Orthopade 2002;31(5):441-453.
13. Gertzbein S, Seligman J, Holtby R, Chan K, Ogston N, Kapasouri A, Tile M. Centrode characteristics of the lumbar spine as a function of segmental instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;(208):48-51.
14. White A, Panjabi M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott: Willams, & Wilkins; 1990.
15. Smith HE, Vaccaro AR, Yuan PS, Papadopoulos S, Sasso R. The use of computerized image guidance in lumbar disk arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19(1):22-27.
16. Fujiwara A, Tamai K, An HS, Lim TH, Yoshida H, Kurihashi A, Saotome K. Orientation and osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;(385): 88-94.
17. Schlenzka D, Laine T, Lund T. [Computer-assisted spine surgery: principles, technique, results and perspectives]. Orthopade 2000;29(7):658-669.
18. Mathews HH, Eisermann L, Le Huec J-C. Total disc arthroplasty using Maverick total disc replacement. In: Guyer RD, Zigler JE, editors. Spinal Arthroplasty, a New Era in Spine Care. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 2005. pp 224-238.
19. Austin MS, Vaccaro AR, Brislin B, Nachwalter R, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ. Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models. Spine 2002;27(22):2503-2508.
20. Geerling J, Gosling T, Gosling A, Ortega G, Kendoff D, Citak M, Krettek C, Hü fner T. Navigated pedicle screw placement: Experimental comparison between CT- and 3D fluoroscopybased techniques. Comput Aided Surg 2008;13(3):157-166.
21. Amiot LP, Bellefleur C, Labelle H. [In vitro evaluation of computer-assisted pedicle screw system]. Ann Chir 1997;51(8):854-860. (Pubitemid 27483508)
22. Bolger C, Wigfield C, Melkent T, Smith K. Frameless stereotaxy and anterior cervical surgery. Comput Aided Surg 1999;4(6):322-327. (Pubitemid 30066750)
23. Jacob AL MP, Baumann B, Suhm N, Steinbrich W, Regazzoni P. Interactive single-step navigation in iliosacral screw fixation of sacral fractures and fracture dislocations. In: Nolte LP, Ganz R, editors. Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS '99), Davos, Switzerland, March 1999. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber; 1999. pp 147-192.
24. Kalfas IH, Kormos DW, Murphy MA, McKenzie RL, Barnett GH, Bell GR, Steiner CP, Trimble MB, Weisenberger JP. Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. J Neurosurg 1995;83(4):641-647.
25. Laine T, Makitalo K, Schlenzka D, Tallroth K, Poussa M, Alho A. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J 1997;6(6):402-405. (Pubitemid 28034372)
26. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavallée S, Sautot P. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;(354):39-48. (Pubitemid 28424044)
27. Mirza SK, Wiggins GC, Kuntz IV C, York JE, Bellabarba C, Knonodi MA, Chapman JR, Shaffrey CI. Accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopic image guidance, and computed tomographic image guidance: a cadaver study. Spine 2003;28(4):402-413. (Pubitemid 36232625)
28. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine 2007;32(3):E111-E120. (Pubitemid 46197463)
29. Honl M, Schwieger K, Gauck CH, Lampe F, Morlock MM, Wimmer MA, Hille E. Comparison of total hip replacements cup orientation and position. Navigation vs. conventional manual implantation of hip prostheses. Orthopade 2005;34(11):1131-1136. (Pubitemid 41624268)
30. Honl M, Schwieger K, Salineros M, Jacobs J, Morlock M, Wimmer M. Orientation of the acetabular component. A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(10):1401- 1405. (Pubitemid 44613159)
31. Stiehl JB, Heck DA, Jaramaz B, Amiot LP. Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component. Comput Aided Surg 2007;12(2):116-124. (Pubitemid 46752425)
32. Grange S Bunker T, Cooper J, Waldhausen S. Comparing electro-optical and electromagnetic guidance in the preparation in minimal access surgical training enviroments. In: Nolte LP, Ganz R, editors. Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS '99), Davos, Switzerland, March 1999. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber; 1999. p 36.
33. Guyer RD, Burd TA, Hochschuler SH. Total disc replacement: implants and clinical results. In: Guyer RD, Zigler JE, editors. Spinal Arthroplasty a New Era in Spine Care. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 2005. pp 180-222.
34. McAfee P, Cunningham B, Hayes V, Sidiqi F, Dabbah M, Sefter J, Hu N, Beatson H. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine 2006;31(19 Suppl): S152-S160.