The use of computerized image guidance in lumbar disk arthroplasty

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 22-27

  Smith, Harvey E ^a   Vaccaro, Alexander R ^e   Yuan, Philip S ^a   Papadopoulos, Stephen ^b,c   Sasso, Rick ^d  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BARROW NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disk arthroplasty; FluoroNav; Fluoroscopy; Image guided surgery; StealthStation, Iso C 3D

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LUMBAR DISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; ROTATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY; CADAVER; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; ROTATION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 33745629817     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000187977.76926.85     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al. Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine. 2001;26:2521-2534.
2. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine. 2002;27:1131-1141.
3. CunninghamBW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2003;28:S110-S117.
4. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine. 1996;21:995-1000.
5. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop. 1997;337:64-76.
6. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al. SB Charite disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord. 2003;16:424-433.
7. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J. 1999;8:210-217.
8. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LE, et al. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine. 2003;28:S167-S175.
9. Kamimura M, Ebara S, Itoh H, et al. Accurate pedicle screw insertion under the control of a computer-assisted image guiding system: laboratory test and clinical study. J Orthop Sci. 1999;4:197-206.
10. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:235-241.
11. Ludwig SC, Kowalski JM, Edwards CC 2nd, et al. Cervical pedicle screws: comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine. 2000;25:2675-2681.
12. Miyamoto K, Shimizu K, Kouda K, et al. Removal of broken pedicle screws. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:150-151.
13. Gebhard F, Kraus M, Schneider E, et al. [Radiation dosage in orthopedics - a comparison of computer-assisted procedures] Unfallchirurg. 2003;106:492-497.
14. Austin MS, Vaccaro AR, Brislin B, et al. Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models. Spine. 2002;27:2503-2508.
15. Mirza SK, Wiggins GC, Kuntz CT, et al. Accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopic image guidance, and computed tomographic image guidance: a cadaver study. Spine. 2003;28:402-413.