Pentop computers as tools for teaching multiplication to students with mild intellectual disabilities

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 367-380

  Bouck, Emily C ^a   Bassette, Laura ^a   Taber Doughty, Teresa ^a   Flanagan, Sara M ^a   Szwed, Kathryn ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950598447     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Alberto, P. A, & Troutman, A. C. (2006). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
2. Beaton, A., Mullis, I., Martin, M., Kelly, D., & Smith, T. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA 's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Boston: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
3. Bouck, E. C., Okolo, C. M., & Courtad, C. A. (2007). Technology at home: Implications for children with disabilities, Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(3), 43-56.
4. Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Lee, K., & Pierce, T. (2001). Teaching mathematics to students with mild-to-moderate mental retardation: A review of the literature. Mental Retardation, 39, 20-31. (Pubitemid 33596664)
5. Cawley, J., Parmar, R., Fley, T. E., Salmon, S., & Roy, S. (2001). Arithmetic performance of students: Implications for standards and programming. Exceptional Children, 67, 311-328. (Pubitemid 33605072)
6. Cooke, N. L., Guzaukas, R., Pressley, J. S., & Kerr, K. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education & Treatment of Children, 16, 213-234.
7. Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M.J. (2005). Adjunctive role for immediate feedback in the acquisition and retention of mathematical fact series by elementary school students classified with mild mental retardation. The Psychological Record, 55, 39-66.
8. Ellis, M. W., & Berry III, R. Q. (2005). The paradigm shift in mathematics education: Explanations and implications of reforming conceptions of teaching and learning. The Mathematics Educator, 15(1), 7-17.
9. Gibson, J. (2005). Smart toys. The Sydney Morning Herald, Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://www.smh.com.au/news/icon/smart-toys/2005/11/30/ 1133311090876.html
10. Grise, P. S. (1980). Florida's minimum competency testing programming for handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 47, 186-193.
11. Harper, G. F., Mallette, B., Maheady, L., Bendey, A. E., & Moore, J. (1995). Retention and treatment failure in classwide peer tutoring: Implications for further research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 399-414.
12. Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & White, O. R. (1992). Teaching mathematics to adolescents classified as educable mentally handicapped: Using calculators to remove the computational onus. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 36-60.
13. Houchins, D. E., Shippen, M. E., & Flores, M. M. (2006) Math assessment and instruction for students at-risk. In R. Colarusso & C. O'Rourke (Eds.), Special education for all teachers (pp. 313-356). DuBuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
14. Jaspers, M. W. M., & Van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (1994). The evaluation of two computerized instruction programs for arithmetic word-problem solving by educable mentally retarded children. Learning and Instruction, 4, 193-215.
15. Jitendra, A., DiPipi, C. M., & Perron-Jones, N. (2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word-problem-solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. Journal of Special Education, 36, 23-38.
16. Jolivette, K., Houchins, D. E., Lingo, A. S., BartonArwood, S. M., & Shippen, M. E. (2006). Building math fluency for students with developmental disabilities and attentional difficulties using Great Leaps Math. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 392-400. (Pubitemid 44832360)
17. Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18. LeapFrog© (2008). Personal learning tools. Retrieved October 21, 2008 from http://www.leapfrogschoolhouse.com/do/findpage?pageKey=plt
19. Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J. C. (2005). Mathematics and technology-based interventions. In Edyburn, D., Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 599-622). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
20. Maine, S. W. (2004). Toys get smarter. Asia One. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://it.asia.l.com.sg/newsdaily/news002-20041206.html
21. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Shian, R. (1997). Can computers teach problem-solvingstrategies to students with mild mental retardation?: A case study. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 157-165. (Pubitemid 127073605)
22. Mattingly, J. C., & Bott, D. A. (1990). Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning problems. Exceptional Children, 56, 438-449.
23. Miller, A. D., Hall, S. W., & Heward, W. L. (1995). Effects of sequential 1-minute time trials with and without inter-trial feedback and self-correction on general and special education fluency with math facts. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 319-345.
24. Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem-solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230-248.
25. Morin, V. A., & Miller, S. P. (1998). Teaching multiplication to middle school students with mental retardation. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 22-36.
26. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat 1425 (2002).
27. nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
28. Parmar, R. S., Cawley, J. F., & Miller, J. H. (1994). Differences in mathematics performance between students with disabilities and students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 60, 549-563.
29. Pogue, D. (2005, November 18). Review: The fine points of a high-performing pen. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/11/18/news/ptpogue19.php
30. Roderman, L. S. (2002). Technology and the very young: Lapware, smart toys, and beyond. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://archive. cpsr.net/essays/2002/2edll.html
31. Saxon Math (2008). Saxon math home. Retrieved October 21, 2008 from http://saxonpublishers. harcourtachieve.com/en-US/sxnm-home
32. Van Luit, J. E. H., & Naglieri, J. A (1999). Effectiveness of the MASTER program for teaching special children multiplication and division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 99-107.
33. Woodward, J., & Montague, M. (2002). Meeting the challenge of mathematics reform for students with LD. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 89-101.
34. Yell, M. L., & Drasgow, E. (2005). No Child Left Behind: A guide for professionals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.