Neural components underlying subjective preferential decision making

NeuroImage

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1626-1632

  Lindsen, Job P ^a   Jones, Rhiannon ^a   Shimojo, Shinsuke ^b   Bhattacharya, Joydeep ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b California Institute of Technology HHMI   (United States)

^c ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Decision Making; EEG; ERP; Faces; Oscillation; Preference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; NERVE CELL NETWORK; OSCILLATION; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; PLACE PREFERENCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THETA RHYTHM; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; THETA RHYTHM; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950595733     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.079     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adolphs R., Tranel D., and Damasio A.R. The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature 393 (1998) 470-474
2. Ambady N., and Skowronski J.J. First Impressions (2008), Guildford Press, New York
3. Antonakis J., and Dalgas O. Predicting elections: child's play. Science 323 (2009) 1183
4. Balconi M., and Lucchiari C. Consciousness and arousal effects on emotional face processing as revealed by brain oscillations. A gamma band analysis. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 67 (2008) 41-46
5. Bechara A., Damasio H., and Damasio A.R. Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 10 (2000) 295-307
6. Bogacz R., Brown E., Moehlis J., Holmes P., and Cohen J.D. The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol. Rev. 113 (2006) 700-765
7. Cohen M.X., Elger C.E., and Fell J. Oscillatory activity and phase-amplitude coupling in the human medial frontal cortex during decision making. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21 (2009) 390-402
8. Corrado G.S., Sugrue L.P., Brown J.R., and Newsome W.T. The trouble with choice: studying decision variables in the brain. In: Glimcher P., Camerer C.F., Fehr E., and Poldrack R.A. (Eds). Neuroeconomics, Decision making and the Brain (2009), Academic Press, San Diego 463-479
9. Damasio A.R., Damasio H., and Christen Y. Neurobiology of decision making (1996), Springer, Berlin, New York
10. Davidson R.J., Ekman P., Saron C.D., Senulis J.A., and Friesen W.V. Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: emotional expression and brain physiology. I. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58 (1990) 330-341
11. Gevins A., Smith M.E., McEvoy L., and Yu D. High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cereb. Cortex 7 (1997) 374-385
12. Glimcher P.W. Choice: towards a standard back-pocket model. In: Glimcher P., Camerer C.F., Fehr E., and Poldrack R.A. (Eds). Neuroeconomics, Decision making and the Brain (2009), Academic Press, San Diego 503-521
13. Jensen O., Kaiser J., and Lachaux J.P. Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory. Trends Neurosci. 30 (2007) 317-324
14. Jensen O., and Tesche C.D. Frontal theta activity in humans increases with memory load in a working memory task. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15 (2002) 1395-1399
15. Johansson P., Hall L., Sikstrom S., and Olsson A. Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science 310 (2005) 116-119
16. Johnson Jr. R. A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology 23 (1986) 367-384
17. Johnston V.S. Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 (2006) 9-13
18. Johnston V.S., and OliverRodriguez J.C. Facial beauty and the late positive component of event-related potentials. J. Sex Res. 34 (1997) 188-198
19. Keating C.F. Charismatic faces: social status cues put face appeal in context. In: Rhodes G., and Zebrowitz L.A. (Eds). Facial Attractiveness (2002), Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT 153-192
20. Kim H., Adolphs R., O'Doherty J.P., and Shimojo S. Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 18253-18258
21. Klimesch W., Schack B., and Sauseng P. The functional significance of theta and upper alpha oscillations. Exp. Psychol. 52 (2005) 99-108
22. Kontsevich L.L., and Tyler C.W. What makes Mona Lisa smile. Vis. Res. 44 (2004) 1493-1498
23. Litt A., Eliasmith C., and Thagard P. Neural affective decision theory: choices, brains, and emotions. Cogn. Syst. Res. 9 (2008) 252-273
24. Mantonakis A., Rodero P., Lesschaeve I., and Hastie R. Order in choice: effects of serial position on preferences. Psychol. Sci. 20 (2009) 1309-1312
25. Maris E., and Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J. Neurosci. Methods 164 (2007) 177-190
26. Martens M.A., Wilson S.J., Dudgeon P., and Reutens D.C. Approachability and the amygdala: insights from Williams syndrome. Neuropsychologia 47 (2009) 2446-2453
27. Moore D.A. Order effects in preference judgments: evidence for context dependence in the generation of preferences. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 78 (1999) 146-165
28. Naumann E., Maier S., Diedrich O., Becker G., and Bartussek D. Structural, semantic, and emotion-focussed processing of neutral and negative nouns: event-related potential correlates. J. Psychophysiol. 11 (1997) 158-172
29. Osipova D., Takashima A., Oostenveld R., Fernandez G., Maris E., and Jensen O. Theta and gamma oscillations predict encoding and retrieval of declarative memory. J. Neurosci. 26 (2006) 7523-7531
30. Sammler D., Grigutsch M., Fritz T., and Koelsch S. Music and emotion: electrophysiological correlates of the processing of pleasant and unpleasant music. Psychophysiology 44 (2007) 293-304
31. Sandkühler S., and Bhattacharya J. Deconstructing insight: EEG correlates of insightful problem solving. PLoS ONE e1459 (2008) 3
32. Schupp H.T., Junghofer M., Weike A.I., and Hamm A.O. Emotional facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex. Psychol. Sci. 14 (2003) 7-13
33. Sheth B.R., Sandkühler S., and Bhattacharya J. Posterior beta and anterior gamma oscillations predict cognitive insight. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21 (2009) 1269-1279
34. Shimojo S., Simion C., Shimojo E., and Scheier C. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nat. Neurosci. 6 (2003) 1317-1322
35. Simion C., and Shimojo S. Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference. Vis. Res. 46 (2006) 3331-3335
36. Thornhill R., and Gangestad S.W. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3 (1999) 452-460
37. Todorov A., Mandisodza A.N., Goren A., and Hall C.C. Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science 308 (2005) 1623-1626
38. Werheid K., Schacht A., and Sommer W. Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biol. Psychol. 76 (2007) 100-108
39. Winston J.S., O'Doherty J., Kilner J.M., Perrett D.I., and Dolan R.J. Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 195-206
40. Zajonc R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 9 (1968) 1-27