Federalism and election law: Implementation issues in Rural America

Publius: The Journal of Federalism

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 275-295

  Creek, Heather M ^a   Karnes, Kimberly A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950545872     PISSN: 00485950     EISSN: 17477107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjp035     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Thad E. Hall. 2005. Rational and pluralistic approaches to HAVA implementation: The cases of Georgia and California. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 35 (4): 559-578.
2. Beamer, Glen. 2002. Elite interviews and state politics research. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2 (1): 86-96.
3. Bowman, Ann O'M. 2002. American Federalism on the horizon. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 32 (2): 3-22.
4. Carpenter, Daniel P. 1996. Adaptive signal processing, hierarchy, and budgetary control in Federal regulation. American Political Science Review 90 (2): 283-302. (Pubitemid 126072750)
5. Coble-Vinzant, Lane Crothers. 1998. Street-level leadership: Discretion and legitimacy in frontline public service. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
6. Election Assistance Commission. 2008. United States Election Assistance Commission, State Governments' Use of Help America Vote Act Funds 2007. Report to the 110th Congress of the United States. July. http://www.eac.gov/election/ HAVA%20Funds/docs/2007-reporton- hava-spending-by-states/attachment-download/ file (accessed December 17, 2008).
7. Electionline.org and the Constitution Project. 2002. Working Together? State and Local Election Coordination. September. www.electionline.org (accessed March 17, 2009).
8. Gilliam, Franklin, and Karen Kaufmann. 1998. Is there an empowerment life cycle? Long-term black empowerment and its influence on voter participation. Urban Affairs Review 33 (6): 741-766. (Pubitemid 28412054)
9. Gimpel, James G., and Joshua J. Dyck. 2005. Maryland: Policy Entrepreneurship in a One-Party State. In Election Reform: Politics and Policy, ed. Daniel J. Palazzolo, and James W. Ceaser, 74-90. Lanham: Lexington Books.
10. Johnston, Jocelyn M. 2008. Welfare reform: A devolutionary success? In Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century, ed. Timothy J. Conlan, and Paul L. Posner, 124-156. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11. Keyssar, Alexander. 2000. The right to vote: The contested history of democracy in the United States. New York, NY: Basic Books.
12. Krause, George A. 1996. The institutional dynamics of policy administration: Bureaucratic influence over securities regulation. American Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 1083-1121. (Pubitemid 126349617)
13. Liebschutz, Sarah F. 2005. New York: An antiquated system resistant to change. In Election reform: Politics and policy, ed. Daniel J. Palazzolo, and James W. Ceaser, 205-222. Lanham: Lexington Books.
14. Liebschutz, Sarah F., and Daniel J. Palazzolo. 2005. HAVA and the States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 35 (4): 497-514.
15. ---. 2006. Complying with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA): Variations among the states. In Making every vote count: Federal election legislation in the states, ed. Andrew Rachlin, Princeton: Policy Research Institute for the Region.
16. Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17. Maynard-Moody, Steve, and Michael Musheno. 2003. Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. Miller, Gary J. 1992. Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Montjoy, Robert S. 2005. HAVA and the States. In Election reform: Politics and policy, ed. Daniel J. Palazzolo, and James W. Ceaser, 16-34. Lanham: Lexington Books.
20. Nathan, Richard P. 2008. Updating theories of American federalism. In Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century, ed. Timothy J. Conlan, and Paul L. Posner, 13-25. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
21. Palazzolo, Daniel J. 2005. Election Reform after the 2000 Election. In Election reform: Politics and Policy, ed. Daniel J. Palazzolo, and James W. Ceaser, 3-15. Lanham: Lexington Books.
22. Palazzolo, Daniel J., John T. Whelan, and Elizabeth Peiffer. 2005. Election reform in Virginia: Deliberation and incremental change. In Election reform: Politics and policy, ed. Daniel J. Palazzolo, and James W. Ceaser, 108-122. Lanham: Lexington Books.
23. Pettigrew, Andrew M. 1979. On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (4): 570-581.
24. Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A. Cloward. 2000. Why Americans still don't vote and why politicians want it that way. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
25. Posner, Paul L. 2008. Mandates: The politics of coercive federalism. In Intergovernmental management for the twenty-first century, ed. Timothy J. Conlan, and Paul L. Posner, 286-309. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
26. Pressman, Jeffrey, and Aaron Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27. Romzek, Barbara, and J. Stephen Hendricks. 1982. Organization involvement and representational bureaucracy: Can we have it both ways? American Political Science Review 76 (1): 75-82.
28. Scholz, John T., and Feng Heng Wei. 1986. Regulatory enforcement in a federalist system. American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1249-1270.
29. Scholz, John T., Jim Twombly, and Barbara Headrick. 1991. Street-level political controls over federal bureaucracy. American Political Science Review 85 (3): 829-850.
30. Whitford, Andrew. 2007. Decentralized policy implementation. Political Research Quarterly 60 (1): 17-30.
31. Wood, B. Dan, and Richard W. Waterman. 1994. Bureaucratic dynamics: The role of bureaucracy in a democracy. Boulder: Westview.