A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: Patient, staff and ward characteristics

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Husum, Tonje Lossius ^a   Bjørngaard, Johan Håkon ^a,b   Finset, Arnstein ^c   Ruud, Torleif ^c,d  

^a SINTEF   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d AKERSHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DELAYED RELEASE FORMULATION; EXERCISE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MEDICAL STAFF; MENTAL DISEASE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NORWAY; PATIENT CARE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COERCION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS; HUMANS; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MENTAL DISORDERS; NORWAY; PATIENT ADMISSION; PATIENT ISOLATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL;

EID: 77950530079     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-89     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. On the borders of persuasion: a psychoanalytic look at coercion. W Gaylin, Psychiatry 1974 37 1 9 4810620
2. Coercion in psychiatry. TW Kallert, Curr Opin Psychiatry 2008 21 485 489 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328305e49f 18650692
3. Ethical problems in decisions on coercive treatment. T Steinert P Lepping R Baranyai L Herbert, European Psychiatry 2004 19 58S
4. Modern psychiatric ethics. S Welsh MP Deahl, Lancet 2002 359 253 255 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07452-4 11812580 (Pubitemid 34113829)
5. Coercion in psychiatric care: clinical, legal, and ethical controversies. R Wynn, International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice 2006 10 247 251 10.1080/13651500600650026 (Pubitemid 44721765)
6. WHO, WHO resource book on mental health, human rights and legislation. Stop exclusion, Dare to care. WHO Library cataloguing in publication data World Health Organization 2005
7. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO, WHO inform about global action programme in mental health 2006
8. Ethics of deliberation, consent and coercion in psychiatry. A Liegeois M Eneman, J Med Ethics 2008 34 73 76 10.1136/jme.2006.019695 18234941
9. The EUNOMIA project on coercion in psychiatry: study design and preliminary data. TW Kallert M Glockner G Onchev J Raboch A Karastergiou Z Solomon, et al. World Psychiatry 2005 4 168 172 16633543
10. [The use of mechanical restraint and seclusion: comparing the clinical practice in Germany and Switzerland]. V Martin R Bernhardsgrutter R Gobel T Steinert, Psychiatr Prax 2007 34 Suppl 2 212 S217 10.1055/s-2006-952005 17394113
11. Epidemiology of compulsory placement and treatment across the European Union: Results from an EU-wide Study. HJ Salize H Dressing, European Psychiatry 2004 19 30S
12. Hospital Characteristics, Diagnoses, and Staff Reasons Associated with Use of Seclusion and Restraint. EJ Betemps E Somoza CR Buncher, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1993 44 367 371 8462945 (Pubitemid 23112574)
13. Variations in seclusion and restraint practices by hospital location. MD Carpenter VR Hannon G McCleery JA Wanderling, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1988 39 418 423 3371909
14. Coercive measures used during hospitalization. Eunomia - final results in the Czech Republic. L Kalisova J Raboch E Kitzlerova TW Kallert, European Psychiatry 2007 22 309 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.01.1122
15. Coercion and restrictions in psychiatric inpatient treatment. R Kaltiala-Heino J Korkeila C Tuohimaki T Tuori V Lehtinen, Eur Psychiatry 2000 15 213 219 10.1016/S0924-9338(00)00223-6 10881219 (Pubitemid 30350558)
16. Involuntary medication in psychiatric inpatient treatment. R Kaltiala-Heino M Valimaki J Korkeila C Tuohimaki V Lehtinen, Eur Psychiatry 2003 18 290 295 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2003.07.002 14611924
17. Compulsory psychiatric care in Sweden - Development 1979-2002 and area variation. L Kjellin O Ostman M Ostman, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2008 31 51 59 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.11.008 18191453
18. Predicting use of coercive measures in Finland. JA Korkeila C Tuohimaki R Kaltiala-Heino V Lehtinen M Joukamaa, Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 2002 56 339 345 10.1080/080394802760322105 12470307
19. Variation among state hospitals in use of seclusion and restraint. RL Okin, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1985 36 648 652 4007818
20. Diagnosis-related frequency of compulsory measures in 10 German psychiatric hospitals and correlates with hospital characteristics. T Steinert V Martin M Baur U Bohnet R Goebel G Hermelink, et al. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2007 42 140 145 10.1007/s00127-006-0137-0 17180296
21. Use of Seclusion and Restraint in Public Psychiatric-Hospitals - Patient Characteristics and Facility Effects. BB Way SM Banks, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990 41 75 81 2295482
22. Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. T Steinert P Lepping R Bernhardsgrutter A Conca T Hatling W Janssen, et al. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2009 19727530
23. R Wynn, Restraint and seclusion in a Norwegian university psychiatric hospital Tromsø: University in Tromsø 2004
24. Organizational features affecting the use of coercion in the administration of psychiatric care. KA Cope JA Encandela, Adm Policy Ment Health 1998 25 309 319 10.1023/A:1022243423121 9727224
25. The Relationship of Crowding and Aggressive-Behavior on A Psychiatric Intensive-Care Unit. T Palmstierna B Huitfeldt B Wistedt, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1991 42 1237 1240 1810862
26. Changes in the Pattern of Aggressive-Behavior Among Inpatients with Changed Ward Organization. T Palmstierna B Wistedt, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1995 91 32 35 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1995.tb09738.x 7754783
27. Attitudes and practices among Ethiopian health care professionals in psychiatry regarding compulsory treatment. A Alem L Jacobsson N Lynoe R Kohn G Kullgren, Int J Law Psychiatry 2002 25 599 610 10.1016/S0160-2527(01)00112-1 12414025
28. Cultures of psychiatry and the professional socialization process: the case of containment methods for disturbed patients. L Bowers J Alexander A Simpson C Ryan P Carr-Walker, Nurse Education Today 2004 24 435 442 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.04.008 15312952
29. The controversy over "chemical restraint" in acute care psychiatry. GW Currier, J Psychiatr Pract 2003 9 59 70 10.1097/00131746- 200301000-00006 15985915
30. Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians. E Falkum R Forde, Soc Sci Med 2001 52 239 248 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00224-0 11144780
31. The influence of staffing levels on the use of seclusion. W Janssen E Noorthoorn R van Linge B Lendemeijer, Int J Law Psychiatry 2007 2007 118 126 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.04.005 (Pubitemid 46343561)
32. Reasons for using seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient care. R Kaltiala-Heino C Tuohimaki J Korkeila V Lehtinen, Int J Law Psychiatry 2003 26 139 149 10.1016/S0160-2527(02)00210-8 12581751
33. Staff Opinions About Seclusion and Restraint at A State Forensic Hospital. V Klinge, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1994 45 138 141 8168792
34. Practices and attitudes among Swedish psychiatrists regarding the ethics of compulsory treatment. G Kullgren L Jacobsson N Lynoe R Kohn, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1996 93 389 396 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10665.x 8792910
35. To commit or not to commit: The psychiatry resident as a variable in involuntary commitment decisions. SP Sattar DA Pinals AU Din PS Appelbaum, Academic Psychiatry 2006 30 191 195 10.1176/appi.ap.30.3.191 16728764
36. Staff's attitudes to the use of restraint and seclusion in a Norwegian university psychiatric hospital. R Wynn, Nord J Psychiatry 2003 57 453 459 10.1080/08039480310003470 14630551
37. Psychologists and coercion: decisions regarding involuntary psychiatric admission and treatment in a group of Norwegian psychologists. R Wynn LH Myklebust T Bratlid, Nord J Psychiatry 2007 61 433 437 10.1080/08039480701773139 18236309
38. Medicate, restrain or seclude? Strategies for dealing with violent and threatening behaviour in a Norwegian university psychiatric hospital. R Wynn, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2002 16 287 291 10.1046/j.1471-6712. 2002.00082.x 12191041
39. Invocation of coercion context in compliance communication - power dynamics in psychiatric care. S Sjostrom, Int J Law Psychiatry 2006 29 36 47 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.06.001 16309742
40. The use of harmful to others-criterion for involuntary treatment in Finland. C Tuohimaki R Kaltiala-Heino J Korkeila T Tuori V Lehtinen M Joukamaa, Eur J Health Law 2003 10 183 199 10.1163/092902703769681614 14635459
41. Treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotics in Norwegian emergency wards, a cross-sectional national study. RA Kroken E Johnsen T Ruud T Wentzel-Larsen HA Jorgensen, BMC Psychiatry 2009 9.24
42. International variation in containment measures for disturbed psychiatric inpatients: A comparative questionnaire survey. L Bowers B van der Werf A Vokkolainen E Muir-Cochrane T Allan J Alexander, International Journal of Nursing Studies 2007 44 357 364 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.005 16524581
43. R Norvoll, Det lukkede rom. Bruk av skjerming som behandling og kontroll i psykiatriske akuttposter (The closed room. Use of seclusion as treatment and control in psychiatric acute wards) Oslo: Institute for social sciences. University in Oslo; 2007. PhD Dissertation
44. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). World Health Organization, 2010
45. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development. JK Wing AS Beevor RH Curtis SB Park S Hadden A Burns, Br J Psychiatry 1998 172 11 18 10.1192/bjp.172.1.11 9534825
46. A review of the psychometric properties of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) family of measures. JE Pirkis PM Burgess PK Kirk S Dodson TJ Coombs MK Williamson, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005 3 76 10.1186/1477-7525-3-76 16313678
47. The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS): reliability, validity and feasibility. TL Husum A Finset T Ruud, Int J Law Psychiatry 2008 31 417 422 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.002 18817973
48. A Leyland H Goldsted, Multilevel modelling of health statistics John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2001
49. TAB Snijders RJ Bosker, Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling Thusand Oaks, CA: Sage 1999
50. Bruk av tvangsmidler i psykisk helsevern i 2001, 2003, 2005 og 2007 (Use of coercive measures in mental health services in 2001, 2003, 2005 and 2007). A8231. R Bremnes T Hatling JH Bjørngaard, Trondheim, SINTEF 2008
51. Incidence of coercive measures as an indicator of quality in psychiatric hospitals. Problems of data recording and processing, preliminary results of a benchmarking study. V Martin W Kuster M Baur U Bohnet G Hermelink M Knopp, et al. Psychiatrische Praxis 2007 34 26 33 10.1055/s-2005-866920 17106840
52. Restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient wards. E Sailas K Wahlbeck, Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2005 18 555 559 10.1097/01.yco. 0000179497.46182.6f 16639118
53. A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint. A Keski-Valkama E Sailas M Eronen AM Koivisto J Lonnqvist R Kaltiala-Heino, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007 42 747 752 10.1007/s00127-007-0219-7 17598058
54. On conflict, containment and the relationship between them. L Bowers, Nursing Inquiry 2006 13 172 180 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2006.00319.x 16918784
55. Psychiatric inpatient aggression - A review of structural and functional assessment approaches. M Daffern K Howells, Aggression and Violent Behavior 2002 7 477 497 10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00073-8 (Pubitemid 34879757)
56. A study of the use of seclusion in an acute psychiatric service. SM El-Badri G Mellsop, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2002 36 399 403 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01003.x 12060190
57. Preliminary outcomes of a trial to reduce conflict and containment on acute psychiatric wards: City Nurses. L Bowers G Brennan C Flood M Lipang P Oladapo, Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2006 13 165 172 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00931.x 16608471
58. Who are the restrained and secluded patients: a 15-year nationwide study. A Keski-Valkama E Sailas M Eronen AM Koivisto J Lonnqvist R Kaltiala-Heino, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2009
59. Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities. CJ Gaskin SJ Elsom B Happell, British Journal of Psychiatry 2007 191 298 303 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.034538 17906239
60. Model monopoly and communication: systems theoretical notes on democratization. S Bråten, Acta Sociologica 1973 16 98 107 10.1177/000169937301600202