International variation in containment measures for disturbed psychiatric inpatients: A comparative questionnaire survey

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 357-364

  Bowers, Len ^a   van der Werf, Bert ^b   Vokkolainen, Aila ^c   Muir Cochrane, Eimear ^d   Allan, Teresa ^a   Alexander, Jane ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b De Geestgronden Psychiatic Center   (Netherlands)

^c VANHA VAASA HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aggression; Mental health; Restraint; Seclusion

Indexed keywords

HYPNOTIC SEDATIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; EDUCATION; ETHNOLOGY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FINLAND; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; NURSING; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHIATRIC NURSING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SAFETY; SELF CONCEPT; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; FINLAND; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; INPATIENTS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NURSING AUDIT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PATIENT ISOLATION; PSYCHIATRIC NURSING; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 33847244790     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alty A. Nurses' learning experience and expressed opinions regarding seclusion practice within one NHS trust. Journal of Advanced Nursing 25 (1997) 786-793
2. AMOS (Arbuckle, J.L.), 2003. AMOS 5.0 Update to the Amos User's Guide (Copyright 2003 by SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago, USA).
3. Bowers L., Callaghan P., Clark N., and Evers C. Comparisons of psychotropic drug prescribing patterns in acute psychiatric wards across Europe. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 60 1 (2004) 29-35
4. Bowers L., Simpson A., Alexander J., Ryan C., and Carr-Walker P. Cultures of psychiatry and the professional socialization process: the case of containment methods for disturbed patients. Nurse Education Today 24 (2004) 435-442
5. Bowles N., Dodds P., Hackney D., Sunderland C., and Thomas P. Formal observations and engagement: a discussion paper. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 9 (2002) 255-260
6. Burnham K.P., and Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (1998), Springer, New York
7. Cutcliffe J., and Barker P. Considering the care of the suicidal client and the case for 'engagement and inspiring hope' or 'observations'. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 9 (2002) 611-621
8. Dijkers W., and Widdershoven T.P. Artikel 38: het belandelingsplan: Dwangbehandeling. De Wet Bopz: Artikelsgewijs commentaar (2002), Koninklijke Vermande, Den Haag
9. Farrell G.A., and Dares G. Seclusion or solitary confinement: therapeutic or punitive treatment?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing 5 (1996) 171-179
10. Holzworth R.J., and Wills C.E. Nurses' judgements regarding seclusion and restrain of psychiatric patients; a social judgement analysis. Research in Nursing and Health 22 3 (1999) 189-201
11. Johnson S., Slavador-Carulla L., and the EPCAT group. Description and classification of mental health services: a European Perspective. European Psychiatry 13 (1998) 333-341
12. Klinge V. Staff opinions about seclusion and restraint at a State Forensic Hospital. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 45 2 (1994) 138-141
13. Korkeila J.A., Tuohimäki C., Kaltiala-Heino R., Lehtinen V., and Joukamaa M. Predicting use of coercive measures in Finland. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 56 5 (2002) 339-345
14. Muir-Cochrane E. An investigation into nurses' perceptions of secluding patients on closed psychiatric wards. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23 (1996) 555-563
15. Olofsson B., Norberg A., and Jacobsson L. Nurses' Experience with using force in Institutional Care of Psychiatric Patients. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 49 5 (1995) 325-330
16. Olofsson B., Gilje F., Jacobsson L., and Norberg A. Nurses' narratives about using coercion in psychiatric care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 28 1 (1998) 45-53
17. Olofsson B., Jacobsson L., Gilje F., and Norberg A. Being in conflict: physicians' experience with using coercion in psychiatric care. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 53 3 (1999) 203-210
18. Plutchik R., Karasu T.B., Conte H.R., Siegel B., and Jerrett I. Toward a rationale for the seclusion process. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 166 (1978) 571-579
19. Steele R. Staff attitudes towards seclusion and restraint: anything new?. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 29 (1993) 23-28
20. Terpstra Terry L., Terpstra Tammy L., Pettee E.J., and Hunter M. Nursing staff's attitudes toward seclusion and restraint. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing 29 5 (2001) 21-49
21. Vorselman, A., 2003. Seclusion, fixation and medication: the application of coercive measures in adult psychiatry internationally compared. Final thesis: Public Administration and Public Policy-European Studies, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
22. Wynaden D., Orb A., McGowan S., Castle D., Zeeman Z., Headford C., Endersbee W., and Finn M. The use of seclusion in the year 2000: what has changed?. Collegian 8 3 (2001) 19-25
23. Wynaden D., Chapman R., McGowan S., Holmes C., Ash P., and Boschman A. Through the eye of the boholder: to seclude or not to seclude. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 11 (2002) 260-268
24. Zinkler M., and Priebe S. Detention of the mentally ill in Europe-a review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 106 (2002) 3-8