Operant conditioning and copulation solicitation display assays reveal a stable preference for local song by female swamp sparrows Melospiza georgiana

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 215-223

  Anderson, Rindy C ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Copulation solicitation display; Female mate choice; Geographic song discrimination; Mating preferences; Melospiza georgiana; Operant conditioning; Swamp sparrow

Indexed keywords

BREEDING POPULATION; COPULATION; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; SONG; SONGBIRD;

CONNEAUT MARSH; PENNSYLVANIA; UNITED STATES;

AVES; MELOSPIZA GEORGIANA;

EID: 77950524686     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0838-y     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adret P (1993) Operant conditioning, song learning and imprinting to taped song in the zebra finch. Anim Behav 46: 149-159.
2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
3. Baker MC (1983) The behavioral responses of female Nuttall's white-crowned sparrows to male song of natal and alien dialects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12: 309-315.
4. Baker MC, Spitler-Nabors KJ, Bradley DC (1981) Early experience determines song dialect responsiveness of female sparrows. Science 214: 819-821.
5. Baker MC, Bjerke TK, Lampe H, Espmark Y (1987) Sexual response of female yellowhammers to differences in regional song dialects and repertoire sizes. Anim Behav 35: 395-401.
6. Balaban E (1988a) Bird song syntax: learned intraspecific variation is meaningful. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 3657-3660.
7. Balaban E (1988b) Cultural and genetic-variation in swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana). 1. Song variation, genetic-variation, and their relationship. Behaviour 105: 250-291.
8. Ballentine B, Hyman J, Nowicki S (2004) Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav Ecol 15: 163-168.
9. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2008) Bird song: Biological themes and variations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 335 pp.
10. Catchpole CK, Dittami J, Leisler B (1984) Differential responses to male song repertoires in female songbirds implanted with oestradiol. Nature 312: 563-564.
11. Clark CW, Marler P, Beeman K (1987) Quantitative analysis of animal vocal phonology: an application to swamp sparrow song. Ethology 76: 101-115.
12. Clayton NS (1988) Song discrimination learning in zebra finches. Anim Behav 36: 1016-1024.
13. Clayton NS (1990) Assortative mating in zebra finch subspecies, Taeniopygia guttata guttata and T. g. castanotis. Phil Trans Biol Sci 330: 351-370.
14. Collins SA (1995) The effect of recent experience on female choice in zebra finches. Anim Behav 49: 479-486.
15. Collins SA (1999) Is female preference for male repertoires due to sensory bias? Proc Roy Soc B, Biol Sci 266(1435): 2309-2314.
16. Cynx J, Nottebohm F (1992) Role of gender, season, and familiarity in discrimination of conspecific song by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 89: 1368-1371.
17. Dooling R, Searcy M (1980) Early perceptual selectivity in the swamp sparrow. Dev Psychobiol 13: 499-506.
18. Forstmeier W, Birkhead TR (2004) Repeatability of mate choice in the zebra finch: consistency within and between females. Anim Behav 68: 1017-1028.
19. Freeberg TM (1998) The cultural transmission of courtship patterns in cowbirds, Molothrus ater. Anim Behav 56: 1063-1073.
20. Freeberg TM, King AP, West MJ (2001) Cultural transmission of vocal traditions in cowbirds (Molothrus ater) influences courtship patterns and mate preferences. J Comp Psychol 115: 201-211.
21. Holveck MJ, Riebel K (2007) Preferred songs predict preferred males: female zebra finches show consistent and repeatable preferences across different testing paradigms. Anim Behav 74: 297-309.
22. Ikebuchi M, Futamatsu M, Okanoya K (2003) Sex differences in song perception in Bengalese finches measured by the cardiac response. Anim Behav 65: 123-130.
23. Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Cam Phil Soc 72: 283-327.
24. King AP, West MJ (1977) Species identification in the North American cowbird: appropriate responses to abnormal song. Science 195: 1002-1004.
25. King AP, West MJ (1983a) Dissecting cowbird song potency: assessing a song's geographic identity and relative appeal. Zeit für Tierpsych 63: 37-50.
26. King AP, West MJ (1983b) Female perception of cowbird song: a closed developmental program. Dev Psychobiol 16: 335-342.
27. King AP, West MJ (1987) Different outcomes of synergy between song production and song perception in the same subspecies (Molothrus ater ater). Dev Psychobiol 20: 177-187.
28. King AP, West MJ (1989) Presence of female cowbirds (Molothrus ater ater) affects vocal imitation and improvisation in males. J Comp Psych 103(1): 39-44.
29. King AP, West MJ (1990) Variation in species-typical behavior: a contemporary issue for comparative psychology. In: Dewsbury DA (ed) Contemporary issues in comparative psychology. Sunderland, Sinauer, pp 321-339.
30. King AP, West MJ, Eastzer DH (1980) Song structure and song development as potential contributors to reproductive isolation in cowbirds (Molothrus ater). J Comp Physiol Psychol 94: 1028-1039.
31. King AP, West MJ, White DJ (2003) Female cowbird song perception: evidence for plasticity of preference. Ethology 109: 1-13.
32. Konishi M, Nottebohm F (1969) Experimental studies in the ontogeny of avian vocalizations. In: Hinde RA (ed) Bird vocalizations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29-48.
33. Lachlan RF, Verhagen L, Peters S, ten Cate C (2009) Are there species-universal categories in bird song phonology and syntax? A comparative study of chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs), zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata) and swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana). J Comp Psychol (in press).
34. Leitão A, ten Cate C, Riebel K (2006) Within song complexity in a songbird is meaningful both to male and female receivers. Anim Behav 71: 1289-1296.
35. MacDougall-Shackleton, SA, MacDougall-Shackleton EA, Hahn TP (2001) Physiological and behavioural responses of female mountain white-crowned sparrows to natal- and foreign-dialect songs. Can J Zool 79: 325.
36. Marler P, Peters S (1981) Sparrows learn adult song and more from memory. Science 213: 780-782.
37. Marler P, Peters S (1988) The role of song phonology and syntax in vocal learning preferences in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia. Ethology 77: 125-149.
38. Marler P, Pickert R (1984) Species-universal microstructure in the learned song of the swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana). Anim Behav 32: 673-689.
39. Miller DB (1979) The acoustic basis of mate recognition by female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Anim Behav 27: 376-380.
40. Nagle L, Kreutzer M (1997) Song tutoring influences female song preferences in domesticated canaries. Behaviour 134: 89-104.
41. Nagle L, Kreutzer M, Vallet E (2002) Adult female canaries respond to male song by calling. Ethology 108: 463-472.
42. Nelson DA, Marler P (1993) Innate recognition of song in white-crowned sparrows: a role in selective vocal learning? Anim Behav 46: 806-808.
43. Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Hughes M, Podos J (2001) The evolution of bird song: male and female response to song innovation in swamp sparrows. Anim Behav 62: 1189-1195.
44. Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Peters S (2002) Quality of song learning affects female response to male bird song. Proc Roy Soc Lond B, Biol Sci 269: 1949-1954.
45. O'Loghlen AL, Beecher MD (1999) Mate, neighbor and stranger songs: a female song sparrow perspective. Anim Behav 58: 13-20.
46. Podos J (1997) A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51: 537-551.
47. Podos J, Warren PS (2007) The evolution of geographic variation in birdsong. Adv Stud Behav 37: 403-458.
48. Podos J, Nowicki S, Peters S (1999) Permissiveness in the learning and development of song syntax in the swamp sparrow. Anim Behav 58: 93-103.
49. Prather JF, Nowicki S, Anderson RC, Peters S, Mooney R (2009) Neural correlates of categorical perception in learned vocal communication. Nat Neurosci 12: 221-228.
50. Riebel K (2000) Early exposure leads to repeatable preferences for male song in female zebra finches. Proc Roy Soc Lond B, Biol Sci 267(1461): 2553-2558.
51. Riebel K, Slater PBJ (1998) Testing female chaffinch song preferences by operant conditioning. Anim Behav 56: 1443-1453.
52. Riebel K, Smallegange IM, Terpstra NJ, Bolhuis JJ (2002) Sexual equality in zebra finch song preference: evidence for a dissociation between song recognition and production learning. Proc Roy Soc Lond B, Biol Sci 269: 729-733.
53. Rutstein NA, Brazill-Boast J, Griffith SC (2007) Evaluating mate choice in the zebra finch. Anim Behav 74: 1277-1284.
54. Searcy WA (1990) Species recognition of song by female red-winged blackbirds. Anim Behav 40: 1119-1127.
55. Searcy WA (1992) Measuring responses of female birds to male song. In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum, New York, pp 175-189.
56. Searcy WA, Andersson M (1986) Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17: 507-533.
57. Searcy WA, Marler P (1981) A test for responsiveness to song structure and programming in female sparrows. Science 213: 926-928.
58. Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
59. Searcy WA, Nowicki S, Hughes M (1997) The response of male and female song sparrows to geographic variation in song. Condor 99(3): 651-657.
60. Searcy WA, Nowicki S, Hughes M, Peters S (2002) Geographic song discrimination in relation to dispersal distances in song sparrows. Am Nat 159(3): 221-230.
61. Smith VA, King AP, West MJ (2000) A role of her own: female cowbirds, Molothrus ater, influence the development and outcome of song learning. Anim Behav 60: 599-609.
62. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. WH Freeman, New York, p 887.
63. Stevenson J (1967) Reinforcing effects of chaffinch song. Anim Behav 15: 427-432.
64. Stevenson J (1969) Song as a reinforcer. In: Hinde RA (ed) Bird vocalizations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 49-60.
65. ten Cate C (1991) Behaviour-contingent exposure to taped song and zebra finch song learning. Anim Behav 42: 857-859.
66. Wagner WE Jr (1998) Measuring female mating preferences. Anim Behav 55: 1029-1042.
67. West MJ, King AP (1986) Ontogenetic programs underlying geographic variation in cowbird song. In: Ouellet H (ed) Acta XIX congressus internationalis ornithologica, vol 2. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, pp 1598-1605.
68. West MJ, King AP (1988) Female visual displays affect the development if male song in the cowbird. Nature 334: 244-246.
69. West MJ, King AP, Eastzer DH (1981) Validating the female bioassay of cowbird song: relating differences in song potency to mating success. Anim Behav 29: 490-501.
70. West MJ, King AP, Freeberg TM (1998) Dual signaling during mating in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater, family Emberizidae/Icterinae). Ethology 104: 250-267.
71. West MJ, King AP, White DJ, Gros-Louis J, Freed-Brown G (2006) The development of local song preferences in female cowbirds (Molothrus ater): flock living stimulates learning. Ethology 112: 1095-1107.
72. Zimmer UE (1982) Birds react to playback of recorded songs by heart rate alteration. Zeit für Tierpsychol 58: 25-30.