Song tutoring influences female song preferences in domesticated canaries

Behaviour

Volumn 134, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 89-104

  Nagle, Laurent ^a   Kreutzer, Michel L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031539839     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853997x00296     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alatalo, R.V., Lundberg, A. & Stahlbrandt, K. (1984). Female mate choice in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14, p. 253-261.
2. Andersson, M. (1982). Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. -Nature 299, p. 818-820.
3. Baker, M.C., Bjerke, T.K., Lampe, H.U. & Espmark, Y.O. (1987). Sexual response of female yellowhammers to differences in regional song dialects and repertoire sizes. - Anim. Behav. 35, p. 395-401.
4. _ _, Spitler-Nabors, K.J. & Bradley, D.C. (1981). Early experiences determine song dialect responsiveness of female sparrows. - Science, N.Y. 214, p. 819-821.
5. Baptista, L.F. & Morton, M.L. (1982). Song dialects and mate selection in montane white-crowned sparrows. - Auk 99, p. 537-547.
6. _ & Petrinovich, L. (1986). Song development in the white-crowned sparrow: social factors and sex differences. - Anim. Behav. 34, p. 1359-1371.
7. _ _, Trail, P.W., Dewolfe, B.B. & Morton, M.L. (1993). Singing and its functions in female white-crowned sparrows. - Anim. Behav. 46, p. 511-524.
8. Blanchard, B.D. (1941). The white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys) of the Pacific seaboard: environment and annual cycle. - Univ. Calif. Publs Zool. 46, p. 1-178.
9. Casey, R.M. & Baker, M.C. (1992). Early social tutoring influences female sexual response in white-crowned sparrows. - Anim. Behav. 44, p. 983-986.
10. Chilton, G., Lein, M.R. & Baptista, L.F. (1990). Mate choice by female white-crowned sparrows in a mixed-dialect population. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, p. 223-227.
11. Clayton, N.S. (1990). Subspecies recognition and song learning in zebra finches. - Anim. Behav. 40, p. 1009-1017.
12. _ & Pröve, E. (1989). Song discrimination in female zebra finches and bengalese finches. - Anim. Behav. 38, p. 352-354.
13. Cunningham, M.A. & Baker, M.C. (1983). Vocal learning in white-crowned sparrows: sensitive phase and song dialects. - Behav. Ecol. 13, p. 259-269.
14. Dooling, R.J. & Searcy, M. (1980). Early perceptual selectivity in the swamp sparrow. -Devl. Psychobiol. 13, p. 499-506.
15. Hartley, R.S. & Suthers, R.A. (1990). Lateralization of syringeal function during song production in the canary. - J. Neurobiol. 21, p. 1236-1248.
16. King, A.P., West, M.J. & Eastzer, D.H. (1980). Song structure and song development as potential contributors to reproductive isolation in cowbirds (Molothrus ater). -J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 94, p. 1028-1036.
17. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M.J. (1991). The paradox of the lek and the evolution of mating preferences. - Nature 350, p. 33-38.
18. Konishi, M. (1965). The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. - Z. Tierpsychol. 22, p. 770-783.
19. Kreutzer, M.L. & Vallet, E.M. (1991). Differences in the responses of captive female canaries to variation in conspecific and heterospecific songs. - Behaviour 117, p. 106-116.
20. _ _, _ _ & Nagle, L. (1994). Sexual responsiveness of female canaries to song bout organisation. - Behaviour 129, p. 293-305.
21. Marler, P.R. (1960). Bird song and mate selection. - In: Animal sounds and communication (W.E. Lanyon & W.A. Tavolga, eds), p. 348-367. Washington DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
22. _ (1970). A comparative approach to vocal learning: song development in white-crowned sparrows. - J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 71, p. 1-25.
23. _ & Peters, S. (1988). The role of song phonology and syntax in the vocal learning preferences in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia. - Ethology 77, p. 125-149.
24. Nagle, L., Kreutzer, M.L. & Vallet, E.M. (1993). Obtaining copulation solicitation displays in female canaries without estradiol implants. - Experientia 49, p. 1022-1023.
25. Nelson, D.A. & Marier, P.R. (1993). Innate recognition of song in white-crowned sparrows: a role in selective vocal learning? - Anim. Behav. 46, p. 806-808.
26. Nottebohm, F. & Nottebohm, M.E. (1976). Left hypoglossal dominance in the control of canary and white-crowned sparrow song. - J. comp. Physiol. A. 108, p. 171-192.
27. Payne, R.B. (1983). In: Social behavior of female vertebrates (S.K. Wasser, ed.), p. 55. Academic Press, New York.
28. Pesch, A. & Güttinger, H.R. (1985). Der Gesang des weiblichen Kanarienvogels. - J. Ornithol. 126, p. 108-110.
29. Petrinovich, L. & Baptista, L.F. (1987). Song development in the white-crowned sparrow: modification of learned song. - Anim. Behav. 35, p. 961-974.
30. Richard, J.P. (1991). Song analysis and synthesis using an Amiga micro-computer. - Bioacoustic 3, p. 45-60.
31. Ryan, M.J., Fox, J.H., Wilczynski, W. & Rand, A.S. (1990). Sexual election for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. - Nature 343, p. 66-67.
32. Salomon, M. (1989). Song as a possible reproductive isolating mechanism between two parapatric forms. The case of the chiffchaffs (Phylloscopus c. collybita and P. c. brehmii) in the western pyrenees. - Behaviour 111, p. 270-290.
33. Searcy, W.A., Marier, P.R. & Peters, S.S. (1981). Species song discrimination in adult female song and swamp sparrows. - Anim. Behav. 29, p. 997-1003.
34. Thorpe, W.H. (1958). The learning of song patterns by birds, with special reference to the song of the chaffinch, - Ibis 100, p. 535-570.
35. _ (1961). Bird song. - Cambridge University Press, London & New York.
36. Vallet, E. & Kreutzer, M.L. (1995). Females canaries are sexually responsive to special song phrases. - Anim. Behav. 49, p. 1603-1610.
37. _ _, _ _ & Gahr, M. (1996). Testosterone induces sexual release quality in the song of female canaries. - Ethology 102, p. 617-628.
38. West, M.J., King, A.P. & Eastzer, D.H. (1981). Validating the female bioassay of cowbird song: relating differences in song potency to mating success. - Anim. Behav. 29, p. 490-501.
39. Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. - McGraw-Hill, London.
40. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. - J. theor. Biol. 53, p. 205-214.