Can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? In the affirmative

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 17, Issue 4 SUPPL. 1, 2002, Pages 54-55

  Engh, Gerard A ^a  

^a ANDERSON ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Gonarthrosis; Knee; Unicondylar arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNICONDYLAR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; KNEE; METHODOLOGY; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036084098     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.32448     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis
2. Survival of knee arthroplasties. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8000 cases
3. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study
4. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup
5. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: A ten year survival study
6. Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15-year followup study
7. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series
8. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement
9. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty