Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Rivermead Mobility Index in stroke patients within the Brazilian cultural and language context;Adaptação transcultural e validação do instrumento Rivermead Mobility Index para pessoas com acidente vascular cerebral no contexto cultural brasileiro e português brasileiro

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 52-55

  Pavan, Karina ^a   da Cruz, Luciana Carneiro Alaman ^a   Nunes, Michele Figueira ^a   Menezes, Liliam Gakiya ^a   Marangoni, Bruna Eriko Matsuda ^a  

^a IRMANDADE DA SANTA CASA DE MISERICÓRDIA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Questionnaires; Stroke; Validation studies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT MOBILITY; PORTUGAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; RIVERMEAD MOBILITY INDEX; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; STROKE PATIENT; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; DISABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STROKE; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAZIL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE; TRANSLATIONS;

EID: 77950505820     PISSN: 0004282X     EISSN: 16784227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-282X2010000100012     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairment, Disabilities, and Handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization;1980.
2. Chiou I, Burnett CN. Values of daily living: a survey of stroke patients and their home therapists. Phys Ther 1985;65:901-906.
3. Teixeira-Salmela LF, Oliveira ESG, Santana EGS, Resende GP. Fortalecimento muscular e condicionamento em hemiplégicos. Acta Fisiátrica 2000;7: 108-118.
4. Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment, Int Disabil Stud 1991;13:50-54.
5. Green J, Forster A, Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Disab Rehabil 2001;23:670-676.
6. Antonucci G, Aprile T, Paolucci S. Rasch analysis of the Rivermead Mobility Index: a study using mobility measures of first-stroke inpatiens. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83: 1442-1449.
7. Hsueh IP, Wang CH, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL, Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke, Stroke 2003;34: 1741-1745.
8. Chen HM, Hsieh CL, Sing KL, Liaw LJ, Chen SM, Lin JH. The test-retest reliability of 2 mobility performance tests in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:347-352.
9. Roorda LD, De Kluis KRA, Molenaar IW, et al. Excellent cross-cultural validity, intra-test reliability and construct validity of the duth Rivermead Mobility Index in patients after stroke undergoing rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:727-732.
10. Franchignoni F, Tesio L, Benevolo E, Otonello M. Psychometric properties of the Rivermead Mobility Index in Italian stroke rehabilitation inpatients. Clin Rehabilit 2003;17:273-282.
11. Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979;65:48-51.
12. Bussmann JB, Stam HJ. Techniques for measument and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical aproach. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:455-464.
13. Guillemin F Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures, Scand J Rheumatol 1995;24:61-63.
14. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures, Spine 2000;25:3186-3191.
15. Forlander DA, Bohanonn RW. Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:97-100.
16. Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:9-13.
17. Maciel ACC, Guerra RO. Fatores associados à alteração da mobilidade em idosos residentes na comunidade. Rev Bras Fisio 2005;9:17-23.
18. th Ed. New York: Inter. Thomson Publishing, 1995.
19. th SAS User Group International Conference, 2001.