Optimising multiple quality criteria of service-oriented software architectures

QUASOSS'09 - Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Quality of Service-Oriented Software Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 25-32

  Martens, Anne ^a   Brosch, Franz ^b   Reussner, Ralf ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b FZI RESEARCH CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Optimisation; Performance; Quality Attribute Prediction; Reliability; Software Architecture

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL MODELS; AUTOMATED APPROACH; COMPONENT MODEL; DEGREES OF FREEDOM; DESIGN SPACES; FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES; HIGH-QUALITY COMPONENTS; HIGH-QUALITY SOFTWARE; IN-BUILDINGS; MULTI-CRITERIA; MULTIPLE QUALITY; OPTIMISATIONS; PERFORMANCE QUALITY; QUALITY CRITERIA; QUALITY PROPERTIES; QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION; RELIABILITY PREDICTION; RELIABILITY SOFTWARE; SERVICE-ORIENTED SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTS; SYSTEMATIC ENGINEERING; SYSTEMATIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERINGS; TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS;

ARCHITECTURE; COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DESIGN; FORECASTING; INFORMATION SERVICES; MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA); SOFTWARE RELIABILITY; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 77950503756     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1596473.1596481     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. A. A. Andrews, E. Mancebo, P. Runeson, and R. B. France. A framework for design tradeo s. Software Quality Journal, 13(4):377-405, 2005.
2. S. Becker. Coupled Model Transformations. In Proc. of the 7th Intl. Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), pages 103-114, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
3. S. Becker, L. Grunske, R. Mirandola, and S. Overhage. Performance Prediction of Component-Based Systems: A Survey from an Engineering Perspective. In R. Reussner, J. Sta ord, and C. Szyperski, editors, Architecting Systems with Trustworthy Components, volume 3938 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 169-192. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
4. S. Becker, H. Koziolek, and R. Reussner. The Palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction. J. of Systems and Software, 82:3-22, 2009.
5. C. Blum and A. Roli. Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(3):268-308, 2003.
6. E. Bondarev, M. R. V. Chaudron, and E. A. de Kock. Exploring performance trade-o s of a JPEG decoder using the DeepCompass framework. In Proc. of the 6th Intl. Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), pages 153-163, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press.
7. V. Cortellessa, P. Pierini, and D. Rossi. Integrating Software Models and Platform Models for Performance Analysis. IEEE Trans. Software Eng, 33(6):385-401, June 2007.
8. V. Cortellessa and C. Trubiani. Towards a library of composable models to estimate the performance of security solutions. In A. Avritzer, E. J. Weyuker, and C. M. Woodside, editors, WOSP, pages 145-156. ACM, 2008.
9. R. Dakin. A tree search algorithm for mixed integer programming problems. Computer Journal, 8:250-255, 1965.
10. K. Deb and R. B. Agrawal. Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Systems, 9:115-148, 1995.
11. M. Ehrgott. Multicriteria Optimization. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 2005.
12. G. Franks, T. Omari, C. M. Woodside, O. Das, and S. Derisavi. Enhanced modeling and solution of layered queueing networks. IEEE Trans. on Software Eng, 35(2):148-161, 2009.
13. S. Gallotti, C. Ghezzi, R. Mirandola, and G. Tamburrelli. Quality prediction of service compositions through probabilistic model checking. In S. Becker, F. Plasil, and R. Reussner, editors, QoSA, volume 5281 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 119-134. Springer, 2008.
14. S. S. Gokhale. Architecture-based software reliability analysis: Overview and limitations. IEEE Trans. on Dependable and Secure Computing, 4(1):32-40, January-March 2007.
15. V. Grassi, R. Mirandola, and A. Sabetta. Filling the gap between design and performance/reliability models of component-based systems: A model-driven approach. J. on Systems and Software, 80(4):528-558, 2007.
16. L. Grunske. Identifying \good" architectural design alternatives with multi-objective optimization strategies. In L. J. Osterweil, H. D. Rombach, and M. L. So a, editors, ICSE, pages 849-852. ACM, 2006.
17. L. Grunske. Early quality prediction of component-based systems - A generic framework. J. of Systems and Software, 80(5):678-686, 2007.
18. M. Harman. The Current State and Future of Search Based Software Engineering. Future of Software Engineering, 2007, pages 342-357, May 23-25 2007.
19. H. Koziolek and F. Brosch. Parameter dependencies for component reliability speci cations. In 6th Intl. Workshop on Formal Engineering approaches to Software Components and Architectures (FESCA). Elsevier, 2009.
20. H. Koziolek and R. Reussner. A Model Transformation from the Palladio Component Model to Layered Queueing Networks. In Performance Evaluation: Metrics, Models and Benchmarks, SIPEW 2008, volume 5119 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 58-78. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
21. M. Lukasiewycz. Opt4j - the optimization framework for java. http://www.opt4j.org, 2009.
22. A. Martens and H. Koziolek. Automatic, model-based software performance improvement for component-based software designs. In 6th Intl. Workshop on Formal Engineering approaches to Software Components and Architectures (FESCA). Elsevier, 2009.
23. J. D. McGregor, F. Bachmann, L. Bass, P. Bianco, and M. Klein. Using arche in the classroom: One experience. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2007-TN-001, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2007.
24. Object Management Group (OMG). UML Pro le for Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded systems (MARTE) RFP (realtime/05-02-06), 2006.
25. T. Parsons and J. Murphy. Detecting performance antipatterns in component based enterprise systems. J. of Object Technology, 7(3):55-90, Mar. 2008.
26. T. L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Piority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New york, 1980.
27. V. S. Sharma and K. S. Trivedi. Quantifying software performance, reliability and security: An architecture-based approach. J. of Systems and Software, 80(4):493-509, 2007.
28. K. S. Trivedi. Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing and Computer Science Applications. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2001.
29. J. Xu. Rule-based automatic software performance diagnosis and improvement. In Proc. of the 7th Intl. Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), pages 1-12, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.