Mixed-method validation of pedagogical concepts for an intercultural online learning environment: A case study

GROUP'07 - Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 321-330

  Law, Effie Lai Chong ^a   Nguyen Ngoc, Anh Vu ^a   Kuru, Selahattin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b ISIK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Competencies; Crosscultural; Online learning environment; Self directed learning; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONVERSATION ANALYSIS; CROSS-CULTURAL COLLABORATION; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; METHOD VALIDATIONS; MULTI-PERSPECTIVE; MULTISOURCES; ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; POSTERIORI; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKING; SOCIAL SOFTWARE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

E-LEARNING; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; RESEARCH;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 77950479463     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1316624.1316673     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Akar, E., Öztürk, E., Tuncer, B., Wiethoff, M. (2004). Evaluation of a collaborative virtual learning environment. Education + Training, 46, 343-352.
2. Bryan, A. (2006). Web 2.0: A new way of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, March/April, 33-44.
3. Clark, H.H., & Brennan S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127- 149). Hyattsville, MD: APA.
4. Convertino, G., Neale, D. C., Hobby, L., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. (2004). A laboratory method for studying activity awareness. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2004, Tampere (Finland), ACM Press, p.313-322.
5. Dillenbourg, P., & Schneider, D. (1995). Collaborative learning and the internet [online document]. Available: http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/research/ CMC/colla/iccai95-1.htm
6. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A. & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds) Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science. (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier.
7. Educational Psychologist (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context, 39 (4).
8. Frechtling, J., & Sharp, L. (Eds.) (1997). User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluation. Directorate for Education and Human Resources Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication, NSF, USA.
9. Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., & Anderson, T. (1998). Transcript analysis of computer-mediated conferences as a tool for testing constructivist and social-constructivist learning theories. In Proc. of the Annual Conference of Distance Teaching and Learning.
10. Hearnshaw, D. (2000). Effective desktop videoconference with minimal network demands. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 221-228.
11. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conference and content analysis. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 117-136). Springer.
12. Hersberger, J.A., Rioux, K. S., & Cruitt, R. O. (2005). Examining information sharing and relationship building in online social networks: An emergent analytic framework. In the Pro. of Canadian Association of Information Science.
13. Hiemstra, R. (1994). Self-directed learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
14. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning. Follett
15. Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd Ed.). Sage.
16. Mckenzie, W., & Murphy, D. (2000). "I hope this goes somewhere": Evaluation of an online discussion group. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 239-257. (Pubitemid 33206019)
17. Rychen, D.S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
18. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G. Davis, G.B., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
19. Setlock, L., Fussell, S.R., Neuwirth, C. (2004). Taking it out of context: Collaborating within and across cultures in faceto- face settings and via instant messaging. Computer Supported Collaborative Work, 6(3), 604-613.
20. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage
21. Stahl, G. (2005). Groups, group cognition and groupware. In H. Fuks, S. Lukosch & A.C. Salgado (Eds.). CRIWG 2005, LNCS 3706 (pp. 1-16). Springer.
22. Strjbos, J-W., Martens, R.L., Prins, F.J., & Jochems, W.M.G.(2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29-48.
23. Twigg, C.A. (2003). New models for online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, Sept/Oct, 28-38.
24. Williams, G. (1997). Task conflict and language differences. Opportunities for videoconferencing? In Proc. 5th ECSCW, 97-108