Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: A minimum 5-year follow-up

Orthopedics

Volumn 30, Issue 8 SUPPL., 2007, Pages 62-65

  Cartier, Philippe ^a   Khefacha, Ahmed ^a   Sanouiller, Jean Louis ^a   Frederick, Keith ^b  

^a Hartmann Knee Institute   (France)

^b Knee Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; METAL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT FAILURE; VARUS KNEE;

ADULT; ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 34548266064     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. O'Rourke M, Michael R, Gardner J, et al. The John Insall Award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one year followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 440:27-37.
2. Harrysson O, Robertsson O, Nayfeh J. Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 421:162-168.
3. Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB, Bernard M, Wan JY. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long term success in middle-age and obese patients. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2005; 14:59-63.
4. Swienckowski J, Pennington. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86:131-142.
5. Cartier P. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: benefits and pitfalls. AAOS Monograph series 25. Rosemont, Ill: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2003:7:59-65.
6. Weale A, Newman J. Unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee. A comparative study with a 12- to 17-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;302: 134-137.
7. Johnson S, Newman J, Jones P. The survivorship and results following revision of a unicompartmental knee replacement. Paper presented at: British Orthopaedics Association Annual Congress; September 27-29, 2006: Glasgow, Scotland.
8. Jackson M, Sarangi P, Newman J. Revision total knee arthroplasty: comparison of outcome following primary proximal tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1994; 9:539-542.
9. Lootvoet L, Massinon A, Rossillon R, et al. Upper tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis in genu varum: apropos of a series of 193 cases reviewed 6 to 10 years later [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1993;79:375-384.
10. Deschamps G, Cartier P. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. In: Malek M. Knee Surgery Complications, Pitfalls and Salvage. New York, NY: Springer Verlag, Thc; 2001:364-379.
11. Marmor L. The modular (Marmor) knee: case report with a follow-up of 2 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; 120:86-94.
12. Pennington D, Swienckowksi J, Lutes W, et al. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: survivorship and technical considerations at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 21:13-17
13. Cartier P, Sanouiller J-L, Grelsamer R. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10 year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11:782-788.
14. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Method in Medical Research. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1987.
15. Dobbs, HS. Survivorship of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980; 62:168-173.
16. Price A, Dodd C, Svard U, et al. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87:1488-1492.
17. Epinette J, Edidin A. Hydroxyapatite-coated unicompartmental knee replacement: a report of five to six years follow-up of the H.A. Uni tibial component. In: Cartier P, Epinette J, Deschamps G, Hernigou P, eds. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Paris, France: Expansion Scientifique Française; 1997:242-260.
18. Padgett D, Stern S, Insall J. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73:186.
19. Grelsamer R, Cartier P. A unicompartmental knee replacement is not "half a total knee" for major differences. Orthop Rev. 1992; 21:1350-1356.
20. Pandit H, Beard D, Jenkins C, et al. Combined anterior cruciate reconstruction and Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006: 88:887-892.