Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making

Transportation

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 85-104

  Te Brömmelstroet, Marco ^a   Bertolini, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Knowledge generation; Land use and transport planning; Planning support systems; Strategy making

Indexed keywords

CURRENT PRACTICES; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS; PLANNING SUPPORT SYSTEMS; STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT; SUPPORT TOOL; SUSTAINABLE URBAN ENVIRONMENTS; TACIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE; TRANSPORT PLANNING;

INTEGRATION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LAND USE; REGIONAL PLANNING;

STRATEGIC PLANNING;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND USE PLANNING; PLANNING PRACTICE; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 77950461621     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-009-9221-0     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Banister, D.: Transport planning. Spon Press, New York (2002).
2. Banister, D.: Unsustainable transport: city transport in the new century. Routledge, London (2005).
3. Brabantstad: Verkenning OV-netwerk Brabantstad: Samen investeren. Brabantstad, Den Bosch (2003).
4. Cabinet Office: Wiring it up. Whitehall's management of cross-cutting policies and services. A performance and innovation unit report. The Stationery Office, London (2000).
5. Cervero, R.: The transit metropolis: a global inquiry. Island Press, Washington, DC (1998).
6. Couclelis, H.: Where has the future gone? Rethinking the role of integrated land-use models in spatial planning. Environ. Plan. A 37, 1353-1371 (2005).
7. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., van Aken, J. E.: Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organ. Stud. 29(03), 393-413 (2008).
8. Ehrmann, J., Stinson, B.: Joint fact-finding and the use of technical experts. In: Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., Thomas-Larmer, J. (eds.) The consensus building handbook. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks (1999).
9. Emberger, G., Ibesich, N., Pfaffenbichler, P.: Can decision making processes benefit from a user friendly land use and transport interaction model?, 8th International Conference on Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, Eindhoven (The Netherlands) (2006).
10. Friedmann, J.: Retracking America, a theory of transactive planning. Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY (1973).
11. Geertman, S.: Potentials for planning support: a planning-conceptual approach. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des 33(6), 863-880 (2006).
12. Gemeente Breda: Bavel, Beek en Berg: Voorontwerp Structuurplan Breda-Oost. Breda (2005).
13. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, P.: The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London (1994).
14. Gourlay, S.: The SECI model of knowledge creation: some empirical shortcomings. In: McGrath, F. and Remenyi D. (ed.) Fourth European conference on knowledge management, Oxford, 18-19 September 2003, pp. 377-385.
15. Gourlay, S.: Conceptualizing knowledge creation: a critique of Nonaka's Theory. J. Manag. Stud. 43(7), 1415-1436 (2006).
16. Healey, P.: Urban complexity and spatial strategies: towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge, London (2007).
17. Hull, A., Tricker, R.: Findings of the 'phase 1' Survey on the barriers to the delivery of sustainable transport solutions. UWE, Bristol (2006).
18. Innes, J. E.: Information in communicative planning. JAPA 64(1), 52-63 (1998).
19. Innes, J. E., Gruber, J.: Planning styles in conflict: the metropolitan transportation commission. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 71((2), 177-188 (2005).
20. Jones, P., Lucas, K.: Option generation: literature review. UCL, London (2005).
21. Khakee, A., Barbanente, A., Borri, D.: Expert and experiential knowledge in planning. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51(7), 776-788 (2000).
22. Klosterman, R. E.: Deliberating about the future. In: Hopkins, L. D., Zapata, M. A. (eds.) Engaging the future: forecasts, scenarios, plans and projects, pp. 199-219. Lincoln Institute of land policy, Cambridge (2007).
23. Meyer, M. D., Miller, E. J.: Urban transportation planning: a decision-oriented approach. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001).
24. Mintzberg, H., Waters, J. A.: Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strateg. Manag. J. 6, 257-272 (1985).
25. Nonaka, I., Konno, N.: The concept of 'Ba': Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Manag. Rev. 40(3), 40-54 (1998).
26. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995).
27. Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., Voelpel, S.: Organizational knowledge creation theory: evolutionary paths and future advances. Organ. Stud. 27(8), 1179-1208 (2006).
28. Noordvleugel.: Metropoolregio Amsterdam: Ontwikkelingsbeeld Noordvleugel 2040. Amsterdam (2008).
29. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M.: Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge (2001).
30. Pawson, R., Tilley, N.: Realistic evaluation. Sage, London (1997).
31. Polanyi, M.: The tacit dimension. Doubleday, New York (1967).
32. Scharmer, C. O., Kaufer, K.: Universities as the birthplace for the entrepreneurial human being. reflections. The SOL J. Knowl. Learn. Chang. (2000).
33. Schön, D.: The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Temple Smith, London (1983).
34. Schön, D., Rein, M.: Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Books, New York (1994).
35. Simon, H. A.: Strategy and organizational evolution. Strateg. Manag. J. 14, 131-142 (1993).
36. Stead, D., Geerlings, H., Meijers, E.: Policy integration in practice. The integration of land use planning, transport and environmental policy-making in Denmark, England and Germany. Delft University Press, Delft (2004).
37. Te Brömmelstroet, M. C. G.: Equip the warrior instead of manning the equipment: state of practice of land use and transport planning support in the Netherlands. J. Transp. Land Use, forthcoming (2009).
38. Te Brömmelstroet, M. C. G., Bertolini, L.: Developing land use and transport PSS: meaningful information through a dialogue between modelers and planners. Transp. Policy 15(4), 251-259 (2008).
39. Tennøy, A.: Why we fail to reduce urban road traffic volumes: does it matter how planners frame the problem? Transport Policy, forthcoming (2009).
40. Timms, P.: Transport models, philosophy and language. Transportation 35(3), 395-410 (2008).
41. TRB: A new vision for mobility: guidance to foster collaborative multimodal decision making. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (2004).
42. Tsoukas, H.: Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In: Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A. (eds.) Organizational learning and knowledge management, pp. 410-425. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2003).
43. Uran, O., Janssen, R.: Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the Netherlands. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 27, 511-526 (2003).
44. van der Bijl, R., Witsen, P. P.: Probleemoplossers versus toekomstdenkers. Blauwe Kamer 4, 28-36 (2000).
45. Vennix, J. A. M.: Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley, Chicester (1996).
46. Vonk, G., Geertman, S., Schot, P.: Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environ. Plan. A 37, 909-924 (2005).
47. Wachs, M.: When planners lie with numbers. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 55, 476-479 (1985).
48. Waddell, P.: UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation and Environmental Planning. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 68(3), 297-314 (2002).
49. Wegener, M.: Overview of land-use and transport models. In: Henscher, D. A., Button, K. (eds.) Transport geography and spatial systems. Pergamon/Elsevier Science, Kidlington (UK) (2005).
50. Willson, R.: Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning paradigm. Transportation 28, 1-31 (2001).
51. Wilson, A. G.: Land-use/transport interaction models, past and future. J. Transp. Econ. 32(1), 3-26 (1998).
52. Zapatha, M. A., Hopkins, L. D.: Engaging the future: forecasts, scenarios, plans and projects. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2007).