Eco-evolutionary dynamics: Fluctuations in population growth rate reduce effective population size in chinook salmon

Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 902-914

  Waples, Robin S ^a   Jensen, David W ^a,b   Mcclure, Michelle ^a  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Age structured species; Chinook salmon; Eco evolutionary trade offs; Ideal population; Northwestern united states; Onchorhynchus tshawytscha; Recruits per spawner; Reproductive success; Semelparous

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; AGE AT MATURITY; COMPENSATION; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GROWTH RATE; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION SIZE; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SALMONID; SEMELPARITY; TIME SERIES; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SALMON; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NORTHWESTERN UNITED STATES; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SALMON; TIME FACTORS;

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 77950452887     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/09-0366.1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allendorf, F. W., and G. Luikart. 2007. Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell, Oxford, UK,
2. Bacaer, N., and R. Ouifki. 2007. Growth rate and basic reproduction number for population models with a simple periodic factor. Mathematical Biosciences 210: 647-658.
3. Beamesderfer, R. C. P., H. A. Schaller, M. P. Zimmerman, C. E. Petrosky, O. P. Langness, and L. LaVoy. 1998. Spawner-recruit data for spring and summer Chinook, salmon populations in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Pages 1-78 in D. R. Marmorek and C. N. Peters, editors. Plan for analyzing and testing hypotheses (PATH): retro-spective and prospective analyses of spring/summer chinook reviewed in FY 1997. ESSA Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
4. Beekman, B. R. 2002. Growth and the plasticity of smoking in Chinook salmon. Dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
5. Beissinger, S. R., and. D. R. McCullough, editors. 2002. Population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
6. Benjamini, Y., and D. Yekutieli. 2001. The control of false discovery rate under dependency. Annals of Statistics 29: 1165-1188.
7. Bohonak, A. J., and H. H. Whiteman. 1999. Dispersal of the fairy shrimp Branchinecta coloradensis (Anostraca): effects of hydroperiod and salamanders. Limnology and Oceanogra-phy 44: 487-493.
8. Boyce, M. S., C. V. Haridas. and. C. T. Lee. and the NCEAS Stochastic Demography Working Group. 2006. Demography in an increasingly variable world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 141-148.
9. Brierley, A., and K. Reid. 1999. Kingdom of the krill: the boom and bust cycle of a tiny crustacean holds the key to the health of the Southern Ocean. New Scientist 162: 36-41.
10. Caceres, C. E., and A. J. Tessier. 2004. To sink or swim: variable diapause strategies among Daphnia species. Limnol-ogy and. Oceanography 49: 1333-1340.
11. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and A. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phyloge-netic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21: 550-570.
12. Chambers, J. C, S. B. Vander Wall, and. E. W. Schupp. 1999. Seed and seedling ecology of pinon and juniper species in the pygmy woodlands of western North America. Botanical Review 65: 1-38.
13. Evans, M. E. K., and J. J. Dennehy. 2005. Germ banking: bet-hedging and variable release from egg and seed dormancy. Quarterly Review of Biology 80: 431-451.
14. Felsenstein, J. 1976. The theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration. Annual Review of Genetics 10: 253-280.
15. Frankham, R. 1995. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research 66 :95-107.
16. Good, T. P., R. S. Waples, and P. Adams, editors. 2005. Updated status of federally listed ESUs of West Coast salmon and steelhead. Technical Memo NMFS-NWFSC-66. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C., USA.
17. Greene, C. M., and T. J. Beechie. 2004. Consequences of potential density-dependent mechanisms on recovery of ocean-type Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 590-602.
18. Hahn, G. J., and W. Q. Meeker. 1991. Statistical intervals: a guide for practitioners. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
19. Hairston, N. G., and W. R. Munns. 1984. The timing of copepod diapause as an evolutionarily stable strategy. American Naturalist 123: 733-751.
20. Harrison, F. 1974. The localization of nuclease activity in spongiilid gemmules by substrate film enzymology. Acta Histochemica 51: 157-163.
21. Healey, M. C. 1991. Life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pages 311-393 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, editors. Pacific salmon life histories. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
22. Healey, M. C., and W. R. Heard. 1984. Inter- and intra-population variation in the fecundity of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and its relevance to life history theory. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41: 476-483.
23. Hedrick, P. 2005. Large variance in reproductive success and the NJN ratio. Evolution 59: 1596-1599.
24. Hone, J., and. T. H. Clutton-Brock. 2007. Climate, food, density and wildlife population growth rate. Journal of Animal Ecology 76: 361-367.
25. Hooper, H. L., R. Connon, A. Callaghan, G. Fryer, S. Yarwood-Buchanan, J. Biggs, S. J. Maund, T. H. Hutch-inson, and R. M. Sibly. 2008. The ecological niche of Daphnia magna characterized using population growth rate. Ecology 89: 1015-1022.
26. Jones, J., P. J. Doran, and R. T. Holmes. 2007. Spatial scaling of avian population dynamics: population abundance, growth rate, and variability. Ecology 88: 2505-2515.
27. Kalinowski, S. T., and R. S. Waples. 2002. Relationship of effective to census size in fluctuating populations. Conserva-tion Biology 16: 129-136. (Pubitemid 34190434)
28. Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
29. Kinnison, M. T., and N. G. Hairston, Jr. 2007. Eco-evolutionary conservation biology: contemporary evolution and the dynamics of persistence. Functional Ecology 21: 444-454.
30. Kitamura, K., and T. Kawahara. 2009. Clonal identification by microsatellite loci in sporadic flowering of a dwarf bamboo species, Sasa cernua. Journal of Plant Research. 122: 299-304.
31. McElhany, P., M. H. Ruckelshaus, M. J. Ford, T. C. Wainwright, and E. P. Bjorkstedt. 2000. Viable salmonid populations and the recovery of evolutionarily significant units. Technical Memorandum NMPS-NWFSC 42. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmo-spheric Administration, Washington, D.C., USA.
32. Mietcalf, J. C., K. E. Rose, and. M. Rees. 2003. Evolutionary demography of monocarpic perennials. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 471-480.
33. Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2002. Quantitative conserva-tion biology: the theory and practice of population viability analysis. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
34. Nobel, P. S. 1992. Annual variations in flowering percentage, seedling establishment, and ramet production for a desert perennial. International. Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 102-107.
35. Nunney, L. 2002. The effective size of annual, plant populations: the interaction of a seed bank with fluctuating population size in maintaining genetic variation. American Naturalist 160: 195-204.
36. Paulsen, C. M., R. A. Hinrichsen, and T. R. Fisher. 2007. Measure twice, estimate once: Pacific salmon population viability analysis for highly variable populations. Transac-tions of the American Fisheries Society 136: 346-364.
37. Pertoldi, C., L. A. Bach, J. S. F. Barker, P. Lundberg, and V., Loeschcke. 2007. The consequences of the variance-mean rescaling effect on effective population size. Oikos 116: 769-774.
38. Peterman, R. M. 1981. Form of random variation in salmon smolt-adult relations and its influence on production estimates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38: 1113-1119.
39. Peters, C., et al. 1999. PATH decision analysis report for Snake River fall Chinook. ESSA Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. (http://www.efw.bpa.gov/PATH/reports/ 991006.fall99d6.pdf)
40. Pourriot, R., and T. Snell. 1983. Resting eggs in rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 213-224.
41. Seamans, M. E., and R. J. Gutierrez. 2007. Sources of variability in spotted owl population growth rate: testing predictions using long-term mark-recapture data. Oecologia 152: 57-70.
42. Shem-Tov, S., E. Zaady, and Y. Gutterman. 2002. Germination of Carrichtera annua (Brassicaceae) seeds on soil samples collected along a rainfall gradient in the Negev Desert of Israel. Israel Journal of Plant Science 50: 113-118.
43. Shrimpton, J. M., and. D. D. Heath. 2003. Temporal changes in genetic diversity and effective population size in chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations: large versus small scale perturbation effects. Molecular Ecology 12: 2571-2583.
44. Taylor, L. R. 1961. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189: 732-735.
45. Van der Voort, M. E., and J. B. McGraw. 2006. Effects of harvester behavior on population growth rate affects sustainability of ginseng trade. Biological Conservation 130: 505-516.
46. Venable, D. L. 2007. Bet hedging in a guild of desert annuals. Ecology 88: 1086-1090.
47. Vitalis, R., S. Glémin, and I. Olivieri. 2004. When genes go to sleep: the population genetic consequences of seed dormancy and monocarpic perenniality. American Naturalist 163: 295-311.
48. Waples, R. S. 1991. Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the definition of "species" under the Endangered Species Act. Marine Fisheries Review 53(3): 11-22.
49. Waples, R. S. 2002. The effective size of fluctuating salmon populations. Genetics 161: 783-791.
50. Waples, R. S. 2004. Salmonid insights into effective population size. Pages 295-314 in A. P. Hendry and S. C. Stearns, editors. Evolution illuminated: salmon and their relatives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
51. Waples, R. S. 2006. Seed banks, salmon, and sleeping genes: effective population size in semelparous, age-structured species with fluctuating abundance. American Naturalist 167: 118-135.
52. Waples, R. S., D. J. Teel, J. Myers, and A. Marshall. 2004. Life history divergence in chinook salmon: historic contingency and parallel evolution. Evolution 58: 386-403.
53. Whisler, J., and S. Jacobs. 2001. Prediction of 2001 ocean abundance of Rogue River fall Chinook salmon. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
54. Wisdom, M. J., L. S. Mills, and D. F. Doak. 2000. Life stage simulation analysis: estimating vital-rate effects on popula-tion growth for conservation. Ecology 81: 628-641.
55. Wright, S. 1938. Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science 87: 430-431.
56. Zabel, R. W., and P. S. Levin. 2002. Simple assumptions on age composition lead to erroneous conclusions on the nature of density dependence in age-structured populations. Oecologia 133: 349-355.
57. Zwick, P. 1996. Variable egg development of Dinocras spp. (Plecoptera, Perlidae) and the stonefly seed bank theory. Freshwater Biology 35: 81-100.