Genomic imprinting of experience-dependent cortical plasticity by the ubiquitin ligase gene Ube3a

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 5611-5616

  Sato, Masaaki ^a,b   Stryker, Michael P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Angelman syndrome; Critical period; Epigenetics; Ocular dominance plasticity; Visual cortex

Indexed keywords

E6 ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENDRITE; EPIGENETICS; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME IMPRINTING; MALE; MONOCULAR DEPRIVATION; MOUSE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PERINATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANGELMAN SYNDROME; ANIMALS; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HUMANS; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, KNOCKOUT; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES; VISUAL CORTEX;

ANIMALIA; MUS;

EID: 77950386683     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1001281107     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Wilkinson LS, Davies W, Isles AR (2007) Genomic imprinting effects on brain development and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:832-843.
2. McGrath J, Solter D (1984) Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37:179-183.
3. Barton SC, Surani MA, Norris ML (1984) Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development. Nature 311:374-376.
4. Allen ND, et al. (1995) Distribution of parthenogenetic cells in the mouse brain and their influence on brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 10782-10786.
5. Keverne EB, Fundele R, Narasimha M, Barton SC, Surani MA (1996) Genomic imprinting and the differential roles of parental genomes in brain development. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 92:91-100.
6. Huibregtse JM, Scheffner M, Howley PM (1993) Cloning and expression of the cDNA for E6-AP, a protein that mediates the interaction of the human papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein with p53. Mol Cell Biol 13:775-784.
7. Albrecht U, et al. (1997) Imprinted expression of the murine Angelman syndrome gene, Ube3a, in hippocampal and Purkinje neurons. Nat Genet 17:75-78.
8. Rougeulle C, Glatt H, Lalande M (1997) The Angelman syndrome candidate gene, UBE3A/E6-AP, is imprinted in brain. Nat Genet 17:14-15.
9. Perk J, et al. (2002) The imprinting mechanism of the Prader-Willi/Angelman regional control center. EMBO J 21:5807-5814.
10. Horsthemke B, Wagstaff J (2008) Mechanisms of imprinting of the Prader-Willi/ Angelman region. Am J Med Genet A 146A:2041-2052.
11. Matsuura T, et al. (1997) De novo truncating mutations in E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase gene (UBE3A) in Angelman syndrome. Nat Genet 15:74-77.
12. Kishino T, Lalande M, Wagstaff J (1997) UBE3A/E6-AP mutations cause Angelman syndrome. Nat Genet 15:70-73.
13. Clayton-Smith J, Laan L (2003) Angelman syndrome: A review of the clinical and genetic aspects. J Med Genet 40:87-95.
14. Jiang YH, et al. (1998) Mutation of the Angelman ubiquitin ligase in mice causes increased cytoplasmic p53 and deficits of contextual learning and long-term potentiation. Neuron 21:799-811.
15. Zoghbi HY (2003) Postnatal neurodevelopmental disorders: Meeting at the synapse? Science 302:826-830.
16. Ehninger D, Li W, Fox K, Stryker MP, Silva AJ (2008) Reversing neurodevelopmental disorders in adults. Neuron 60:950-960.
17. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1970) The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol 206:419-436.
18. Kalatsky VA, Stryker MP (2003) New paradigm for optical imaging: Temporally encoded maps of intrinsic signal. Neuron 38:529-545.
19. Yashiro K, et al. (2009) Ube3a is required for experience-dependent maturation of the neocortex. Nat Neurosci 12:777-783.
20. Sato M, Stryker MP (2008) Distinctive features of adult ocular dominance plasticity. J Neurosci 28:10278-10286.
21. Hensch TK, et al. (1998) Local GABA circuit control of experience-dependent plasticity in developing visual cortex. Science 282:1504-1508.
22. Taha S, Hanover JL, Silva AJ, Stryker MP (2002) Autophosphorylation of alphaCaMKII is required for ocular dominance plasticity. Neuron 36:483-491.
23. Cang J, et al. (2005) Development of precise maps in visual cortex requires patterned spontaneous activity in the retina. Neuron 48:797-809.
24. Godement P, Salaün J, Imbert M (1984) Prenatal and postnatal development of retinogeniculate and retinocollicular projections in the mouse. J Comp Neurol 230: 552-575.
25. Feng G, et al. (2000) Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron 28:41-51.
26. Trachtenberg JT, Trepel C, Stryker MP (2000) Rapid extragranular plasticity in the absence of thalamocortical plasticity in the developing primary visual cortex. Science 287:2029-2032.
27. Taha SA, Stryker MP (2005) Ocular dominance plasticity is stably maintained in the absence of alpha calcium calmodulin kinase II (alphaCaMKII) autophosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16438-16442.
28. Fagiolini M, Hensch TK (2000) Inhibitory threshold for critical-period activation in primary visual cortex. Nature 404:183-186.
29. Weeber EJ, et al. (2003) Derangements of hippocampal calcium/calmodulin- dependent protein kinase II in a mouse model for Angelman mental retardation syndrome. J Neurosci 23:2634-2644.
30. Taha S, Stryker MP (2002) Rapid ocular dominance plasticity requires cortical but not geniculate protein synthesis. Neuron 34:425-436.
31. Antonini A, Stryker MP (1993) Rapid remodeling of axonal arbors in the visual cortex. Science 260:1819-1821.
32. Antonini A, Fagiolini M, Stryker MP (1999) Anatomical correlates of functional plasticity in mouse visual cortex. J Neurosci 19:4388-4406.
33. McGee AW, Yang Y, Fischer QS, Daw NW, Strittmatter SM (2005) Experience-driven plasticity of visual cortex limited by myelin and Nogo receptor. Science 309: 2222-2226.
34. Dindot SV, Antalffy BA, Bhattacharjee MB, Beaudet AL (2008) The Angelman syndrome ubiquitin ligase localizes to the synapse and nucleus, and maternal deficiency results in abnormal dendritic spine morphology. Hum Mol Genet 17: 111-118.
35. Yamasaki K, et al. (2003) Neurons but not glial cells show reciprocal imprinting of sense and antisense transcripts of Ube3a. Hum Mol Genet 12:837-847.
36. Niell CM, Stryker MP (2008) Highly selective receptive fields in mouse visual cortex. J Neurosci 28:7520-7536.