Inducing morphemes using light knowledge

ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Tepper, Michael ^a   Xia, Fei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Allomorphy; Computational linguistics; Machine learning; Morphological induction

Indexed keywords

F-SCORE; HYBRID APPROACH; LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE; MACHINE-LEARNING; REWRITE RULES; SEGMENTATION ALGORITHMS; STUMBLING BLOCKS; SURFACE MORPH; SURFACE SEGMENTATION; TEST EVALUATION; TURKISHS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 77950364700     PISSN: 15300226     EISSN: 15583430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1731035.1731038     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BERNHARD, D. 2007. Simple morpheme labeling in unsupervised morpheme analysis. In Working Notes for the Workshop on Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF'07).
2. CHENG, C. K. AND SEE, S. L. 2006. The revised wordframe model for the Filipino language. J. Res. Sci. Comput. Eng.
3. CHOMSKY, N. AND HALLE, M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. Harper &Row: New York.
4. CREUTZ, M. AND LAGUS, K. 2004. Induction of a simple morphology for highly inflecting languages. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology (SIGPHON'04). 43-51.
5. CREUTZ, M. 2006. Induction of the morphology of natural language: Unsupervised morpheme segmentation with application to automatic speech recognition. Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki University of Technology.
6. CREUTZ, M. AND LAGUS, K. 2002. Unsupervised discovery of morphemes. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02). 21-30.
7. CREUTZ, M. AND LAGUS, K. 2004. Induction of a simple morphology for highly inflecting languages. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology (SIGPHON). 43-51.
8. CREUTZ, M. AND LAGUS, K. 2005. Inducing the morphological lexicon of a natural language from unannotated text. In Proceedings of the International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Adaptive Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (AKRR'05). 106-113.
9. CREUTZ, M. AND LAGUS, K. 2006. Morfessor in the morpho challenge. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenge Workshop on Unsupervised Segmentation of Words into Morphemes (PASCAL'06).
10. DASGUPTA, S. AND NG, V. 2007. High performance, language-independent morphological segmentation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference/North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL'07).
11. DE MARCKEN, C. G. 1996. Unsupervised language acquisition. Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
12. DEJEAN, H. 1998. Morphemes as necessary concept for structures discovery from untagged corpora. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Paradigms and Grounding in Natural Language Learning (CoNLL'98). 295-299.
13. DELIGNE, S. AND BIMBOT, F. 1997. Inference of variable-length linguistic and acoustic units by multigrams. Speech Comm. 23, 223-241.
14. DEMBERG, V. 2007. A language-independent unsupervisedmodel for morphological segmentation. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Learning (ACL'07).
15. G̈OKSEL, A. AND KERSLAKE C. 2005. Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge: London.
16. GOLDSMITH, J. 2001. Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Comput. Linguist. 27, 2, 153-198.
17. HARRIS, Z. S. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. University of Chicago Press.
18. HUDDLESTON, R. AND PULLUM, G. K. 2001. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.
19. KAPLAN, R. M. AND KAY, M. 1981. Phonological rules and finite-state transducers. In Linguistic Society of America Meeting Handbook. New York.
20. KAPLAN, R. M. AND KAY, M. 1994. Regular models of phonological rule systems. Comput. Linguist. 20, 3.
21. KARTTUNEN, L. AND BEESLEY, K. R. 2001. A short history of two-level morphology. In Proceedings of the European Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information (ESSLLI'01).
22. KARTTUNEN, L. AND BEESLEY, K. R. 2005. Twenty-five years of finite-state morphology. In Inquiries into Words, Constraints, and Contexts: Festschrift for Kimmo Kosenniemi on his 60th Birthday. CSLI Publications.
23. KESHAVA, S. AND PITLER, E. 2006. A simpler, intuitive approach to morpheme induction. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenge Workshop on Unsupervised Segmentation of Words into Morphemes (PASCAL'06).
24. KOSKENNIEMI, K. 1983. Two-Level Morphology: A General Computational Model for Word-Form Recognition and Production. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
25. KOSKENNIEMI,K. 2003. Computational morphology. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, E-Reference Ed., W. J. Frawley Ed., Oxford University Press.
26. KURIMO, M., CREUTZ, M., AND VARJOKALLIO,M. 2007. Unsupervised morpheme analysis evaluation by a comparison to a linguistic gold standard-Morpho Challenge 2007. In Working Notes for the CLEF Workshop.
27. KURIMO, M., CREUTZ, M., VARJOKALLIO, M., ARISOY, E., AND SARAÇLAR, M. 2006. Unsupervised segmentation of words into morphemes-Morpho Challenge 2005, an introduction and evaluation report. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenge Workshop on Unsupervised Segmentation of Words into Morphemes.
28. LEWIS, G. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford University Press.
29. MONSON, C., CARBONELL, J., LAVIE, A., AND LEVIN, L. 2008. Paramor and morpho challenge 2008. In Working Notes for the CLEF Workshop.
30. PENG, F. AND SCHUURMANS, D. 2001. A hierarchical EM approach to word segmentation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intel. Data Analysis (IDA). 238-247.
31. SCHONE, P. AND JURAFSKY, D. 2001. Knowledge-free induction of inflectional morphologies. In Proceedings of the NAACL'01.
32. SNOVER, M. G. AND BRENT, M. R. 2001. A bayesian model for morpheme and paradigm identification. In Proceedings of the ACL'01. 482-490.
33. TROST, H. 2003. Morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford University Press, 25-47.
34. WICENTOWSKI, R. 2002. Modeling and learning multilingual inflectional morphology in a minimally supervised framework. Ph.D. thesis, Johns Hopkins University.
35. YAROWSKY, D. AND WICENTOWSKI, R. 2000. Minimally supervised morphological analysis by multimodal alignment. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'00). 207-216.