A language-independent unsupervised model for morphological segmentation

ACL 2007 - Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 920-927

  Demberg, Vera ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGLUTINATIVE LANGUAGE; FINNISH; GRAPHEME-TO-PHONEME CONVERSION; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; MORPHOLOGICAL SEGMENTATION; SEGMENTATION QUALITY; TURKISHS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH SYNTHESIS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 70349790022     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Delphine Bernhard. 2006. Unsupervised morphological segmentation based on segment predictability and word segments alignment. In Proceedings of 2nd Pascal Challenges Workshop, pages 19-24, Venice, Italy.
2. Stefan Bordag. 2006. Two-step approach to unsupervised morpheme segmentation. In Proceedings of 2nd Pascal Challenges Workshop, pages 25-29, Venice, Italy.
3. Mathias Creutz and Krista Lagus. 2006. Unsupervised models for morpheme segmentation and morphology learning. In ACM Transaction on Speech and Language Processing.
4. H. Déjean. 1998. Morphemes as necessary concepts for structures: Discovery from untagged corpora. In Workshop on paradigms and Grounding in Natural Language Learning, pages 295-299, Adelaide, Australia.
5. Vera Demberg. 2006. Letter-to-phoneme conversion for a German TTS-System. Master's thesis. IMS, Univ. of Stuttgart.
6. Vera Demberg. 2007. Phonological constraints and morphological preprocessing for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. In Proc. of ACL-2007.
7. Eric Gaussier. 1999. Unsupervised learning of derivational morphology from inflectional lexicons. In ACL '99 Workshop Proceedings, University of Maryland.
8. CELEX German Linguistic User Guide, 1995. Center for Lexical Information. Max-Planck-Institut for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
9. John Goldsmith. 2001. Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. computational Linguistics, 27(2):153-198, June.
10. S. Goldwater and D. McClosky. 2005. Improving statistical mt through morphological analysis. In Proc. of EMNLP.
11. Margaret A. Hafer and Stephen F. Weiss. 1974. Word segmentation by letter successor varieties. Information Storage and Retrieval 10, pages 371-385.
12. Zellig Harris. 1955. From phoneme to morpheme. Language 31, pages 190-222.
13. Christian Jacquemin. 1997. Guessing morphology from terms and corpora. In Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 156-165.
14. S. Keshava and E. Pitler. 2006. A simpler, intuitive approach to morpheme induction. In Proceedings of 2nd Pascal Challenges Workshop, pages 31-35, Venice, Italy.
15. M. Kurimo, M. Creutz, M. Varjokallio, E. Arisoy, and M. Saraclar. 2006. Unsupervsied segmentation of words into morphemes - Challenge 2005: An introduction and evaluation report. In Proc. of 2nd Pascal Challenges Workshop, Italy.
16. J. Lucassen and R. Mercer. 1984. An information theoretic approach to the automatic determination of phonemic baseforms. In ICASSP 9.
17. C. Monson, A. Lavie, J. Carbonell, and L. Levin. 2004. Unsupervised induction of natural language morphology inflection classes. In Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of ACLSIGPHON, pages 52-61, Barcelona, Spain.
18. C.Monz andM. de Rijke. 2002. Shallow morphological analysis in monolingual information retrieval for Dutch, German, and Italian. In Proceedings CLEF 2001, LNCS 2406.
19. Sylvain Neuvel and Sean Fulop. 2002. Unsupervised learning of morphology without morphemes. In Proc. of the Wshp on Morphological and Phonological Learning, ACL Pub.
20. Helmut Schmid, Arne Fitschen, and Ulrich Heid. 2004. SMOR: A German computational morphology covering derivation, composition and inflection. In Proc. of LREC.
21. Patrick Schone and Daniel Jurafsky. 2000. Knowledge-free induction of morphology using latent semantic analysis. In Proc. of CoNLL-2000 and LLL-2000, Lisbon, Portugal.
22. Tageszeitung (TAZ) Corpus. Contrapress Media GmbH. https://www.taz.de/pt/ .etc/nf/dvd.
23. David Yarowski and Richard Wicentowski. 2000. Minimally supervised morphological analysis by multimodal alignment. In Proceedings of ACL 2000, Hong Kong.