Strengthening Prevention Performance Using Technology: A Formative Evaluation of Interactive Getting To Outcomes®

American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 469-481

  Chinman, Matthew ^a   Tremain, Beverly ^b   Imm, Pamela ^c   Wandersman, Abraham ^c  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b University of South Carolina ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Capacity building; Diffusion; Substance use prevention; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; CAPACITY BUILDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

CAPACITY BUILDING; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MISSOURI; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TENNESSEE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77950364203     PISSN: 00029432     EISSN: 19390025     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0016705     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chinman, M., Hannah, G., Wandersman, A., Ebener, P., Hunter, S., Imm, P., & Sheldon, J. (2005). Developing a community science research agenda for building community capacity for effective preventive interventions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 3/4, 143-157.
2. Chinman, M., Hunter, S., Ebener, P., Paddock, S., Stillman, L., Imm, P. Wandersman, A. (2008). The Getting To Outcomes demonstration and evaluation: An illustration of the Prevention Support System. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 206-224.
3. Chinman, M., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2004). Getting To Outcomes 2004: Promoting accountability through methods and tools for planning, implementation, and evaluation (No. TR-TR101). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
4. Community Tool Box. (2009). More Information about the CTB. Retrieved June 1, 2009, from http:ctb.ku.eduenMore_Information_about_CTB.htm.
5. Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, D. W., Sartorius, J., & Bontempo. D. (2007). Effects of the Communities That Care Model in Pennsylvania on Youth Risk and Problem Behaviors. Prevention Science, 8, 261-270.
6. Fetterman, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.) (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7. Foster, L., & Nixon, M. (1975). The interview reassessed. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 21, 18-22.
8. George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Uchiyama, K. (2000). Extent of implementation of a standards-based approach to teaching mathematics and student outcomes. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 35, 8-25.
9. Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322-1327.
10. Green, L. W., Kreuter, M. W., Deeds, S. G., & Partridge, K. B. (1980). Health education planning model (PRECEDE). In L. W. Green (Ed.), Health education planning (pp.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
11. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools facilitating the process. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F. (1977). A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 263-276.
14. Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 52-56.
15. Imm, P., Chinman, M., Wandersman, A., Rosenbloom, D., Guckenburg, S., & Leis, R. (2007). Preventing underage drinking: Using the SAMHSA strategic prevention framework and the Getting To Outcomes model to achieve results (TR-403-SAMHSA). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
16. Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Rapkin, B., & Trickett, E. J. (2005). Comprehensive dynamic trial designs for behavioral prevention research with communities: Overcoming inadequacies of the randomized controlled trial paradigm. In E. J. Trickett & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), Community intervention and AIDS (pp. 249-276) Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
19. Rubin, D. B. (1980). Bias reduction using Mahalanobis metric matching. Biometrics, 36, 293-298.
20. Simpson, D. D. (2002). A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 171-182.
21. Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004). PROSPER Community-University Partnership Model for Public Education Systems: Capacity-Building for Evidence-Based, Competence-Building Prevention. Prevention Science, 5, 31-39.
22. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Clair, S., & Feinberg, M. (2007). Substance-Use Outcomes at 18 Months Past Baseline: The PROSPER Community-University Partnership Trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 395-402.
23. Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171-181.
24. Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community interventions and effective prevention. American Psychologist, 58, 441-448.
25. Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (2000). Getting to outcomes: A results-based approach to accountability. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 389-395.
26. Zhang, X. (2003). A Web-based IT Solution for outcome-based prevention. National Institute on Drag Abuse Grant Number 1R41DA014890-01A1. Unpublished material listed in the original grant application for this project.