Learning efficacy of simultaneous audio and on-screen text in online lectures

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 748-762

  Debuse, Justin C W ^a   Hede, Andrew ^a   Lawley, Meredith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950362482     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1119     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Attaran, M. (2000). Voice recognition software programs: Are they right for you? Information Management & Computer Security, 8(1), 42-44.
2. Ayers, P. & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention effect in multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York.
3. Baddeley, A. (1998). Human memory. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
4. Buckler, G. (2001). Recognizing voice recognition. Computer Dealer News, 17(22), 17.
5. Byrnes, R. & Ellis, A. (2006). The prevalence and characteristics of online assessment in Australian universities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 104-125. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet22/byrnes.html
6. Christensen, J. & Hughes, B. (2007). Voice-enabled IT transformation: The new voice technologies. IBM Systems Journal, 46(4), 763-775.
7. Clark, R. E. & Feldon, D. F. (2005). Five common but questionable principles of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York.
8. Clark, R. E. & Mayer, R. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Wiley, San Francisco, CA.
9. Day, J., Foley, J. & Catrambone, R. (2006). Investigating multimedia learning with web lectures. GVU Technical Report GIT-GVU-06-25. Georgia Institute of Technology, GA. http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/13141
10. Dillon, A. & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322-349.
11. Fang, X., Xu, S., Brzezinski, J. & Chan, S. S. (2006). A study of the feasibility and effectiveness of dual-modal information processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(1), 3-17.
12. Hede, A. (2002a). An integrated model of multimedia effects on learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(2), 177-191.
13. Hede, A. (2002b). Student reaction to speech recognition technology in lectures. In S. McNamara & E. Stacey (Eds), Proceedings of the Australian Society for Educational Technology (ASET) International Conference, 7-10 July, ASET, Melbourne. http://www.ascilite.org.au/asetarchives/confs/2002/hede-a.html
14. Hede, T. & Hede, A. (2002). Multimedia effects on learning: Design implications of an integrated model. In S. McNamara & E. Stacey (Eds), Proceedings of the Australian Society for Educational Technology (ASET) International Conference, 7-10 July, ASET, Melbourne. http://www.ascilite.org.au/aset-archives/confs/2002/hede-t.html
15. Hsiu-Ting, H. (2009). Learners' perceived value of video as mediation in foreign language learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(2), 171-190.
16. Kalyuga, S. (2000). When using sound with a text or picture is not beneficial for learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 161-172. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet16/kalyuga.html
17. Kalyuga, S., Ayers, P., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23-31.
18. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2004). When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction can interfere with learning. Human Factors, 46(3), 1-15.
19. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
20. Kalyuga, S. & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 558-568.
21. Kim, J. H. & Lee, S. B. (2007). Speech recognition using multilayer recurrent neural prediction models and HMM. Control and Intelligent Systems, 35(1), 9-14.
22. Lang, A. (1995). Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited-capacity information processing perspective. Communication Research, 22(1), 86-115.
23. Leitch, D. & MacMillan, T. (2001). Improving access for persons with disabilities in higher education using speech recognition technology: Year II progress report. Unpublished Report, Liberated Learning Project, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Canada. http://www.liberatedlearning.com/resources/docs/RC_2001_Year_II_Research_Report.doc
24. Liao, Y. (1998). Effects of hypermedia versus traditional instruction on students' achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(4), 341-360.
25. Liao, Y. (1999). Effects of hypermedia on students' achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(3), 255-277.
26. Low, R. & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York.
27. Marshall, P. (2002). Voice recognition: Sound technology. Federal Computer Week, 16(1), 32.
28. Mayer, R. E.Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York.
29. Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J. & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187-198.
30. Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 42-52.
31. Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320.
32. Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
33. Mayer, R. E. & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 484-490.
34. McNeil, B. J. & Nelson, K. R. (1991). Meta-analysis of interactive video instruction: A 10-year review of achievement effects. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(1), 1-6.
35. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156-163.
36. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 358-368.
37. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A. & Lester, J.C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based multimedia learning: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177-214.
38. Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R. & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319-334.
39. Pass, F., Renkl, A. & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Cognitive Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
40. Pass, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H. & Van Gervan, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Cognitive Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
41. Pavio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford University Press, New York.
42. Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term memory. Memory and Cognition, 17, 398-422.
43. Pociask, F. D. & Morrison, G. R. (2008). Controlling split attention and redundancy in physical therapy instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4) 379-399.
44. Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York.
45. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne.
46. Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L. & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 71-81.
47. Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3(4), 257-267.
48. Yong, Z. (2007). Speech technology and its potential for special education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(3), 35-41.