RDF(S) interoperability results for semantic web technologies

International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1083-1108

  García Castro, Raúl ^a   Gómez Pérez, Asunción ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Benchmark suite; Benchmarking; Interoperability; RDF(S)

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARK SUITE; BENCHMARK SUITES; COMMON FORMAT; DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; FIELD STUDIES; KNOWLEDGE MODEL; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY;

BENCHMARKING; INTEROPERABILITY; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 77950357670     PISSN: 02181940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218194009004556     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. D. Brickley and R. V. Guha (eds.), RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004 (2004).
2. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 14598-14601: Software product evaluation - Part 1: General overview, 1999.
3. R. Camp, Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance (ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, 1989).
4. M. Spendolini, The Benchmarking Book (AMACOM, New York, NY, 1992).
5. C. Wohlin, A. Aurum, H. Petersson, F. Shull and M. Ciolkowski, Software inspection benchmarking - a qualitative and quantitative comparative opportunity, in Proceedings of 8th International Software Metrics Symposium, 2002, pp. 118-130.
6. B. Kitchenham, DESMET: A method for evaluating software engineering methods and tools, Technical Report TR96-09, Department of Computer Science, University of Keele, Staffordshire, UK, 1996.
7. A. Weiss, Dhrystone benchmark: History, analysis, scores and recommendations, White paper, EEMBC Certification Laboratories, LLC, 2002.
8. R. García-Castro, Keynote: Towards the improvement of the Semantic Web technology, in Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Scalable Semantic Web Knowledge Base Systems (SSWS2006), Athens, GA, USA (2006).
9. IEEE-STD-610: ANSI/IEEE Std 610.12-1990, IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, IEEE (1991).
10. E. Duval, Learning technology standardization: Making sense of it all, Int. J. Computer Science and Information Systems 1 (2004) 33-43.
11. A. Sheth, Changing focus on interoperability in information systems: From system, syntax, structure to semantics, in Interoperating Geographic Information Systems (Kluwer, 1998), pp. 5-30.
12. J. Euzenat, T. L. Bach, J. Barrasa, P. Bouquet, J. D. Bo, R. Dieng-Kuntz, M. Ehrig, M. Hauswirth, M. Jarrar, R. Lara, D. Maynard, A. Napoli, G. Stamou, H. Stuckenschmidt, P. Shvaiko, S. Tessaris, S. V. Acker and I. Zaihrayeu, D2.2.3 State of the art on ontology alignment, Technical report, Knowledge Web (2004).
13. R. Brachmann and H. Levesque, A fundamental tradeoff in knowledge representation and reasoning, in Readings in Knowledge Representation (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1985), pp. 31-40.
14. T. Gruber, A translation approach to portable ontology specifications, Knowledge Acquisition 5 (1993) 199-220.
15. OntoWeb, OntoWeb Deliverable 1.3: A survey on ontology tools, Technical report, OntoWeb Thematic Network, 2002.
16. D. Maynard, S. Dasiopolou, S. Costache, K. Eckert, H. Stuckenschmidt, M. Dzbor and S. Handschuh, D1.2.2.1.3 Benchmarking of annotation tools, Technical report, KnowledgeWeb (2007).
17. Y. Sure, O. Corcho (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON2003), Vol.87 of CEUR-WS, Florida, USA.
18. R. García-Castro and A. Ǵomez-Ṕerez, Guidelines for benchmarking the performance of ontology management APIs, in Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2005), LNCS 3729, Galway, Ireland (Springer-Verlag, 2005), pp. 277-292.
19. D. McGuiness and F. van Harmelen, OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004, Technical report (2004).
20. O. Corby and C. Faron-Zucker, Corese: A Corporate Semantic Web Engine, in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Real World RDF and Semantic Web Applications, 11th International World Wide Web Conference, Hawai, USA, 2002.
21. B. McBride, Jena: Implementing the RDF Model and Syntax Specification, in Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Semantic Web (SemWeb2001), 2001.
22. B. Motik, A. Maedche and R. Volz, A conceptual modeling approach for semanticsdriven enterprise applications, in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Application of Semantics (ODBASE2002), 2002.
23. N. Noy, R. Fergerson and M. Musen, The knowledge model of Prot́eǵe-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility, in Proceedings of the 2th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW2000), Juan-les-Pins, France, 2000.
24. J. Broekstra, A. Kampman and F. van Harmelen, Sesame: A generic architecture for storing and querying RDF and RDF schema, in Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2002), Vol.2342 (Springer, 2002), pp. 54-68.
25. J. Arpírez, O. Corcho, M. Ferńandez-Ĺopez and A. Ǵomez-Ṕerez, WebODE in a nutshell, AI Magazine 24 (2003) 37-47.
26. R. García-Castro and A. Ǵomez-Ṕerez, Benchmark suites for improving the RDF(S) importers and exporters of ontology development tools, in Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2006), LNCS 4011, Budva, Montenegro (Springer-Verlag, 2006).
27. R. García-Castro, Y. Sure, M. Zondler, O. Corby, J. Prieto-Gonźalez, E. P. Bontas, L. Nixon and M. Mochol, D1.2.2.1.1 Benchmarking the interoperability of ontology development tools using RDF(S) as interchange language, Technical report, Knowledge Web (2006).