Guidelines for benchmarking the performance of ontology management APIs

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3729 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 277-292

  García Castro, Raúl ^a   Gómez Pérez, Asunción ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PERFORMANCE; SEMANTICS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EXECUTION EFFICIENCY; ONTOLOGY MANAGEMENT; SEMANTIC WEB;

INTERFACES (COMPUTER);

EID: 33646419772     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11574620_22     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. A.J. Duineveld, R. Stoter, M.R. Weiden, B. Kenepa, and V.R. Benjamins. Wondertools? a comparative study of ontological engineering tools. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW'99), Banff, Canada, 1999. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Ontoweb deliverable 1.3: A survey on ontology tools. Technical report, 1ST Onto Web Thematic Network, May 2002.
3. P. Lambrix, M. Habbouche, and M. Pérez. Evaluation of ontology development tools for bioinformatics. Bioinformatics, 19(12): 1564-1571, 2003.
4. st International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON2002), Sigüenza, Spain, September 2002.
5. nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON2003), Florida, USA, October 2003.
6. rd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON2004), Hiroshima, Japan, November 2004.
7. A. Magkanaraki, S. Alexaki, V. Christophides, and D. Plexousakis. Benchmarking RDF schemas for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference, pages 132-146. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
8. nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON2003), Florida, USA, October 2003.
9. Y. Guo, Z. Pan, and J. Heflin. An evaluation of knowledge base systems for large OWL datasets. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), pages 274-288, Hiroshima, Japan, November 2004.
10. J.C. Arpírez, O. Corcho, M. Fernández-López, A. Gómez-Pérez. WebODE in a nutshell.AI Magazine. 24(3), Fall 2003, pp. 37-47.
11. M. Spendolini. The Benchmarking Book. AMACOM, New York, NY, 1992.
12. B. Kitchenham. DESMET: A method for evaluating software engineering methods and tools. Technical Report TR96-09, Department of Computer Science, University of Keele, Stanfordshire, UK, 1996.
13. C. Wohlin, A. Aurum, H. Petersson, F. Shull, and M. Ciolkowski. Software inspection benchmarking - a qualitative and quantitative comparative opportunity. In Proceedings of 8th International Software Metrics Symposium. 118-130, 2002.
14. R. García-Castro, D. Maynard, H. Wache, D. Foxvog, and R. González-Cabero. D2.1.4 Specification of a methodology, general criteria and benchmark suites for benchmarking ontology tools. Technical report, Knowledge Web, December 2004.
15. V.R. Basili, G. Caldiera, D.H. Rombach. The Goal Question Metric Approach. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, 2 Volume Set Willey, pp 528-532,1994.
16. J.M. Bull, L.A. Smith, M.D. Westhead, D.S. Henry, R.A. Davey. A Methodology for Benchmarking Java Grande Applications. EPCC, June 1999.
17. B. Shirazi, L. Welch, B. Ravindran, C. Cavanaugh, B. Yanamula, R. Brucks, E. Huh. DynBench: A Dynamic Benchmark Suite for Distributed Real-Time Systems. IPDPS Workshop on Embedded HPC Systems and Applications. S. Juan, Puerto Rico, 1999.
18. th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'03), pages 74-83, Portland, OR, 2003.
19. F. Stefani, D. Macii, A. Moschitta, and D. Petri. FFT benchmarking for digital signal processing technologies. In 17th IMEKOWorld Congress, Dubrovnik, June 2003.
20. th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall, 1995.
21. V.K. Chaudhri, A. Farquhar, R. Pikes, P.D. Karp, J.P. Rice. The Generic Frame Protocol 2.0. Technical Report, Stanford University, 1997.