Cross-agreement complaints before the Appellate Body: A case study of the EC–Asbestos dispute

World Trade Review

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 63-87

  Pauwelyn, Joost ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008564337     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745601001033     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bodansky, D. (1999), ‘Non Liquet and the Incompleteness of International Law’, in Boisson de Chazournes, L. and Sands, P. (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons, 153–170
2. Davey, W. (2001), ‘Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceeded its Authority, A Consideration of Deference Shown by the System to Member Government Decisions and Its Use of Issue–Avoidance Techniques’, Journal of International Economic Law, 4:95
3. Fastenrath, U. (1996), Lücken im Völkerrecht: Zu Rechtscharakter, Quellen, Systemzusammenhang, Methodenlehre und Funktionen des Völkerrechts
4. Fitzmaurice, G. (1953), ‘The Law and Procedure of the ICJ, 1951–54: General Principles and Sources of Law’, British Yearbook of International Law, 30:1
5. Hulsroj, P. (1999), ‘Three Sources – No River, A Hard Look at the Sources of Public International Law with a Particular Emphasis on Custom and “General Principles of Law”, Zeitschrift fur Offentliches Recht, 54:219
6. Jenks, W. (1953), ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’, British Yearbook of International Law, 30: 401
7. Koskenniemi, M. (1999), ‘The Silence of Law/The Voice of Justice’, in Boisson de Chazournes, L. and Sands, P. (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons: 488–510
8. Lauterpacht, H. (1949), ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’, British Yearbook of International Law, 26: 48
9. Lauterpacht, H. (1958), ‘Some Observations on the Prohibition of “Non Liquet” and the Completeness of the Law’ in Symbolae Verzijl: 196
10. Montaguti and Lugard (2000), ‘The GATT 1994 and Other Annex 1A Agreements: Four Different Relationships?’, Journal of International Economic Law 3(3): 473
11. Pauwelyn, J. (1998), ‘Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement, Who Bears the Burden?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 1: 227–258
12. Pauwelyn, J. (2001), ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’, American Journal of International Law, 95: 535–578
13. Stone, J. (1959), ‘Non Liquet and the Function of Law in the International Community’, British Yearbook of International Law, 35:135
14. Weil, P. (1997), ‘The Court Cannot Conclude Definitively … Non Liquet Revisited’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36: 109
15. Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures, TRIMS Agreement.
16. Appellate Body Report, European Communities – Trade Description of Scallops, WT/DS7, 12 and 14, notified on 5 July 1996; (Mutually agreed solution).
17. Appellate Body Report, United States – Restrictions on Imports of Cotton and Man-Made Fibre Underwear, WT/DS24/AB/R, adopted on 25 February 1997.
18. Appellate Body Report, United States – Measures Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses, WT/DS33/AB/R, adopted on 23 May 1997.
19. Appellate Body Report, Canada – Certain Measures Concerning Periodicals, WT/DS31/AB/R, adopted on 30 July 1997.
20. Appellate Body Report, Guatemala Anti-Dumping Investigation Regarding Portland Cement from Mexico, WT/DS60/AB/R, adopted on 5 November 1998.
21. Appellate Body Report, Australia – Measures Affecting the Importation of Salmon, WT/DS18/AB/R, adopted on 6 November 1998.
22. Appellate Body Report, Brazil – Export Financing Programme for Aircraft, WT/DS46/AB/R, adopted on 20 August 1999.
23. Appellate Body Report, Argentina – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear, WT/DS121/AB/R, adopted on 12 January 2000.
24. Appellate Body Report, Korea – Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Certain Dairy Products, WT/DS98/AB/R, adopted on 12 January 2000.
25. Appellate Body Report, United States – Tax Treatment for ‘Foreign Sales Corporations’, WT/DS108/AB/R, adopted on 20 March 2000, para. 117.
26. Appellate Body Report, United States – Import Measures on Certain Products from the European Communities, WT/DS165/AB/R, adopted on 10 January 2001.
27. Appellate Body Report, United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan, WT/DS184/AB/R, adopted on 23 August 2001.
28. Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. USA), Merits, International Court of Justice Reports 1986, 24.
29. Employment of Women during the Night case, Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A/B, No. 50, 377.
30. Fisheries Jurisdiction case (UK v. Iceland), International Court of Justice Reports 1974, 9.
31. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Reports 1996.
32. Lighthouses between France and Greece case, Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A/B, No. 62, 14.
33. Northern Cameroons case, International Court of Justice Reports 1962.
34. Nuclear Tests cases, International Court of Justice Reports 1974.
35. Panel and Appellate Body Reports on European Communities – Measures Affecting the Prohibition of Asbestos and Asbestos Products, WT/DS135/R and AB/R, adopted on 5 April 2001.
36. Panel Report on European Communities – Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, WT/DS27/R, adopted on 25 September 1997.
37. Panel Report on European Communities- Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/R and 48/R, adopted on 13 February 1998.
38. Panel Report on Indonesia – Certain Measures Affecting the Automobile Industry, WT/DS54/R, adopted on 23 July 1998.
39. Panel Report on Turkey – Restrictions on Imports of Textile and Clothing Products, WT/DS34/R, adopted on 19 November 1999.
40. Panel Report on United States – Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, WT/DS2/R, adopted on 20 March 1996.
41. Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. USA), International Court of Justice Reports 1998, 131.
42. S.S. Lotus (France v. Turkey), Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10, 1927.
43. Southern Bluefin Tuna case (Australia and New Zealand v. Japan), Award of 4 August 2000; (www.worldbank.org/icsid).