Surface texture and roughness of polished nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 213-223

  Endo, Tatsuo ^a   Finger, Werner J ^a   Kanehira, Masafumi ^a   Utterodt, Andreas ^b   Komatsu, Masashi ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b WC Heraeus GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dental resin composite; Polishability; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DIAMOND; FILTEK SUPREME; GLASS; GRANDIO; INORGANIC COMPOUND; NANOCOMPOSITE; NANOPARTICLE; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE; RESIN; SILICON CARBIDE; SILICON DERIVATIVE; TETRIC EVOCERAM; URETHAN; VENUS (COMPOSITE RESIN);

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CARBON COMPOUNDS, INORGANIC; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DIAMOND; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOPARTICLES; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; SILICON COMPOUNDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; URETHANE;

EID: 77950354543     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2009-019     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Lietha-Elmer E, Kratky G. Polishing effect and abrasion of five toothpastes on dental enamel. Helv Odontol Acta 1979; 23: 987-995.
2. Herrgott AM, Ziemiecki TL, Dennison JB. An evaluation of different composite resin systems finished with various abrasives. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 119: 729-732.
3. Yap AUJ, Wu SS, Chelvan S, Tan ESF. Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 99-104.
4. Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finishing procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91: 101-106.
5. Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 225-227.
6. Milosevic A. The influence on surface finish and in-vitro pellicle on contact-angle measurement and surface morphology of three commercially available composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19: 85-97.
7. Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Brit Dent J 2004; 196: 42-45.
8. Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 587-594.
9. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17: 102-109.
10. Gordan VV, Patel SB, Barrett AA, Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 560-567.
11. Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, Aladag A. Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 413-420.
12. Park SH, Noh BD, Ahn HJ, Kim HK. Celluloid strip-finished versus polished composite surface: difference in surface discoloration in microhybrid composites. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 62-66.
13. Jefferies SR, Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ. Three composite finishing systems: a multisite in vitro evaluation. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4: 181-185.
14. Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 265-275.
15. Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 260-265.
16. Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 243-247.
17. Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 2001; 26: 535-576.
18. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of advanced nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382-1390.
19. Yap AU, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 269-274.
20. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 641-648.
21. Goldstein RE. Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin North Am 1989; 33: 210-219.
22. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1998; 42: 613-627.
23. Quirynen M, Marechal M, Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, Darius PL, van Steenberghe DV. The influence on surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. J Clin Periodontol 1990; 17: 138-144.
24. Strassler HE, Bauman G. Current concepts in polishing composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993; 5: 12-17.
25. Van Noort R, Davis LG. The surface finish of composite resin restorative materials. Brit Dent J 1984; 157: 360-364.
26. Van Dijken JW, Ruyter IE. Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing. Acta Odontol Scand 1987; 45: 337-346.
27. Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 325-330.
28. Takanashi E, Kishikawa R, Ikeda M, Inai N, Otsuki M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Influence of abrasive particle size on surface properties of flowable composites. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 780-786.
29. Berastegui E, Canalda C, Brau E, Miquel C. Surface roughness of finished composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 742-749.
30. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 269-274.
31. Choi MS, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 347-353.
32. Türkün LS, Türkün M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 203-211.
33. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. J Biomater Appl 2004; 19: 121-134.
34. Gedik R, Hürmüzlü F, Coskun A, Bektas OO, Özdemir AK. Surface roughness of new microhybrid resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 1106-1112.
35. Abu-Bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Evaluation of the surface roughness of compomer by laser scanning microscopy. Dent Mater J 2001; 20: 172-180.
36. Marigo L, Rizzi M, La Torre G, Rumi G. 3-D surface profile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 562-568.
37. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-269.
38. Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finishing procedures. Oral Health 1975; 65: 29-33.
39. Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, May KN Jr, Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials. J Dent 2000; 28: 367-373.
40. Silikas N, Kavvadia K, Eliades G, Watts D. Surface characterization of modern resin composites: a multitechnique approach. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 95-100.
41. Da Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, Mazur RF, Roeder L. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 214-226.
42. Jung M, Sehr K, Kliemek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 45-52.