On the absolute configurational stability of bromonium and chloronium ions

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1232-1233

  Denmark, Scott E ^a   Burk, Matthew T ^a   Hoover, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL PROBLEMS; CHEMICAL EQUATIONS; CONFIGURATIONAL STABILITY; CONFIGURATIONALLY; ENANTIO; ENANTIOSELECTIVE; HALONIUM; REVERSIBLE FORMATION; STEREOSPECIFICITY;

CHEMICAL REACTIONS; ENANTIOMERS; IONS; SOLVENTS;

OLEFINS;

BROMINE DERIVATIVE; CHLORINE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BROMINATION; DIASTEREOISOMER; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; MOLECULAR STABILITY; QUANTUM YIELD; SOLVOLYSIS;

EID: 77950341605     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: 15205126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja909965h     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. (a) Roberts, I.; Kimball, G. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 947-948.
2. (b) DeLaMar, P. B. D.; Bolton, R. Electrophilic Additions to Unsaturated Systems, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: New York, 1982; pp 136-197.
3. (c) Schmid, G. H.; Garrat, D. G. In The Chemistry of Double Bonded Functional Groups; Patai, S., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1977; Part 2, pp 725-912.
4. (a) Ranganathan, S.; Muraleedharan, K. M.; Vaish, N. K.; Jayaraman, N. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 5273-5308.
5. (b) Stavber, S.; Jereb, M.; Zupan, M. Synthesis 2008, 1487-1513.
6. (c) Montaña, Á. M.; Batalla, C.; Barcia, J. A. Curr. Org. Chem. 2009, 13, 919-938.
7. (a) Kwon, H. Y.; Park, C. M.; Lee, S. B.; Youn, J.-H.; Kang, S. H. Chem. - Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1023-1028.
8. (b) Sakakura, A.; Ukai, A.; Ishihara, K. Nature 2007, 445, 900-903.
9. (c) Snyder, S. A.; Tang, Z.-Y.; Gupta, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5744-5745.
10. (d) Wilkinson, S. C.; Lozano, O.; Schuler, M.; Pacheco, M. C.; Salmon, R.; Gouverneur, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7083-7086. For enantioselective Wacker-type chlorination and bromination processes, see:
11. (e) El-Qisairi, A.; Hamed, O.; Henry, P. M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2790-2791.
12. (f) Hamed, O.; Henry, P. M. Organometallics 1998, 17, 5184-5189.
13. (g) El-Qisairi, A.; Henry, P. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 603, 50-60.
14. (h) El-Qisairi, A. K.; Qaseer, H. A.; Henry, P. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 656, 168-176.
15. (i) El-Qisairi, A. K.; Qaseer, H. A.; Katsigras, G.; Lorenzi, P.; Trivedi, U.; Tracz, S.; Hartman, A.; Miller, J. A.; Henry, P. M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 439-441.
16. (a) Nilewski, C.; Geisser, R. W.; Carreira, E. M. Nature 2009, 457, 573-576.
17. (b) Bedke, D. K.; Shibuya, G. M.; Pereira, A.; Gerwick, W. H.; Haines, T. H.; Vanderwal, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7570-7572.
18. (a) Brown, R. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 131-137.
19. (b) Neverov, A. A.; Brown, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 962-968.
20. (c) Neverov, A. A.; Muise, T. L.; Brown, R. S. Can. J. Chem. 1997, 75, 1844-1850.
21. (d) Rodebaugh, R.; Fraser-Reid, B. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 7663-7678.
22. (a) Denmark, S. E.; Collins, W. R.; Cullen, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3490-3492.
23. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Vogler, T. Chem. - Eur. J. 2009, 15, 11737-11745.
24. Braddock, D. C.; Hermitage, S. A.; Kwok, L.; Pouwer, R.; Redmond, J. M.; White, A. J. P. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1082-1084.
25. (a) Lucas, H. J.; Gould, C. W., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1941, 63, 2541-2551.
26. (b) Winstein, S.; Seymour, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1946, 68, 119-122.
27. (a) Olah, G. A.; Bollinger, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 4744-4752.
28. (b) Olah, G. A.; Bollinger, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 947-953.
29. (c) Olah, G. A.; Bollinger, J. M.; Brinich, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2587-2594.
30. (d) Zheng, C. Y.; Slebocka-Tilk, H.; Nagorski, R. W.; Alvarado, L.; Brown, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2122-2127.
31. (e) Nagorski, R. W.; Brown, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7773-7779.
32. The syntheses of enantiomerically enriched halo sulfonates 1, 6, and 8 are described in the Supporting Information.
33. starting material) x 100%] provides a convenient method of describing the conservation of configurational purity for the reaction.
34. Hexafluoroisopropanol has been used in classic studies of solvolysis mechanisms; see: Schadt, F. L.; Bentley, T. W.; Schleyer, P. v. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 7667-7674.
35. The insensitivity of e.s. to the concentration of NaOAc can be interpreted as a sodium ion assisted ionization to a solvent separated ion pair which collapses to product. If dissociated ions are not formed, then the concentration of NaOAc is irrelevant. For detailed discussion of solvolysis reactions, see: Raber, D. J.; Harris, J. M.; Schleyer, P. v. R. In Ions and Ion Pairs in Organic Reactions; Szwarc, M., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1974; Vol. 2, Chapter 3.
36. 10 was carried out in the presence of 4. The crossover product 5a was formed in 51:49 er. This outcome is ambiguous and cannot distinguish the pathways; see ref 5c.