Research agenda for environmental reproductive health in the 21st century

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 307-310

  Woodruff, Tracey J ^a   Schwartz, Jackie ^a   Giudice, Linda C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; HEALTH IMPACT; HEALTH RISK; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; PUBLIC HEALTH; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLLUTANT; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; GENETIC FITNESS; HUMANS; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH;

EID: 77950336783     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2009.091108     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Colborn T, Dumanoski D. Myers JP. Our stolen future. New York: Penguin Books USA, lne, 1996.
2. Crain DA, Janssen SJ, Edwards TM, et al. Female reproductive disorders: The roles of endocrine-disrupting compounds and developmental timing. Fertil Steril 2008;90:911-940
3. Woodruff TJ, Carlson A, Schwartz JM, et al. Proceedings of the Summit on Environmental Challenges to Reproductive Health and Fertility: executive summary. fertil Steril 2008;89:e1-20.
4. Schattier T, Solomon G, Valentl M, et al. Generations at risk. Reproductive health and the environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
5. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Bourguignon JP, Giudice LC, et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. EndocrRev 2009;30:293-342.
6. Euling SY, Selevan SG, Pescovitz OH, et al. Role of environmental factors in the timing of puberty. Pediatrics 2008;121 (Suppl 3):S167-71.
7. Federal Reserve Board. G.17-lndustrial Production and Capacity Utilization, Industrial Production for Chemicals (NAICS=325). The Federal Reserve Board Data Download Program 2008http://www.federalreserve.gov/ datadownload/Download. aspx?rel=G17&series= 4374e8caec6beeaa874d28776fa68c1e&filetype= spreadsheetml&label= include&layout=seriescolumn&from=01/01/1919&to=12/31/ 2009 (accessed Dec 2009).
8. U.S. EPA. What is the TSCA chemical substance inventory. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2006.
9. CDC. Third National report on human exposure to environmental chemicals. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005.
10. Porta M. Persistent toxic substances: exposed individuals and exposed populations. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:534-535
11. Rusyniak DE, Furbee RB, Pascuzzi R. Historical neurotoxins: what we have learned from toxins of the past about diseases of the present. Neurol Clin 2005:23:337-352
12. Guo YL, Lambert GH, Hsu CC, et al. Yucheng: health effects of prenatal exposure to polychlorlnated biphenyls and dibenzofurans. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004;77:153-158
13. Teitelbaum DT. The toxicology of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP): a brief review. Int J Occup Environ Health 1999;5:122-126
14. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Living with the past: evolution, development, and patterns of disease. Science 2004;305:1733-1736
15. National Academy of Science. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. Washington, DC: National Research Council Committee on Improving Risk Analysis Approaches Used by the U.S. EPA, 2008.
16. National Research Council. Phthalates and cumulative risk assessment: The task ahead. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008.
17. Woodruff TJ, Zeise L, Axelrad DA, et al. Meeting report: moving upstream-evaluating adverse upstream end points for improved risk assessment and decision-making. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:1568-1575
18. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Stem Cells in Predictive Toxicology. 2008.
19. . Olea N, Fernandez M. Endocrine disruption. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:372-373
20. Bray F, Richiardi L, Ekbom A, et al. Trends in testicular cancer incidence and mortality in 22 European countries: continuing increases in incidence and declines in mortality. Int J Cancer 2006;118:3099-3111
21. Shah MN, Devesa SS, Zhu K, et al. Trends in testicular germ cell tumours by ethnic group in the United States. Int J Androl 2007;30:206-13; discussion 13-14.
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. American's Children and the Environment. Washington, DC, 2008.
23. Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L. The rise in autism and the role of age at diagnosis. Epidemiology 2009;20:84-90.
24. Pastor PN, Reuben CA. Diagnosed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disability: United States, 2004-2006. Vital Health Stat 2008;10:1-14.
25. Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:297-302.
26. Vu LT, Nobuhara KK, Laurent C, et al. Increasing prevalence of gastroschisis: population-based study in California. J Pediatr 2008;152:807-811
27. Harris KB, Pass KA. Increase in congenital hypothyroidism In New York State and in the United States. Mol Genet Metab 2007;91:268-277
28. Swan SH, Hertz-Picciotto I. Reasons for infecundity. Farn Plann Perspect 1999;31:156-157
29. Brett K. Fecundity in 2002 NSFG women 15-24 years of age (personal communication). Hyattsvllle, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2008.
30. Davidoff MJ, Dias T, Damus K, et al. Changes in the gestational age distribution among U.S. singleton births: impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:8-15.
31. Dahlstrom BL, Engh ME, Bukholm G, et al. Changes in the prevalence of preeclampsia in Akershus County and the rest of Norway during the past 35 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:916-921
32. Getahun D, Nath C, Ananth CV, et al. Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal trends 1989 through 2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:525.e1-5
33. Aksglaede L, Sorensen K, Petersen JH, et al. Recent decline in age at breast development: The Copenhagen puberty study. Pediatrics 2009;123:e932-9.
34. Jorgensen N, Asklund C, Carlson E, et al. Coordinated European investigations of semen quality: results from studies of Scandinavian young men is a matter of concern. Int J Androl 2006;29:54-61; discussion 105-108
35. Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, et al. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ 1992;305:609-613
36. Andersson A, Jensen TK, Petersen JH, et al. Trends in leydig cell function in Danish men. Hum Reprod 2005;20:i26.
37. Perheentupa A, Laatlkainen T, Vlerula M, et al. Clear birth cohort Effect in serum testosterone and SHBG levels in Finnish men. Endocrine Society Meeting 2006 2006.