The opinion of the spanish psychologists on the use of the tests;La opinión de los psicólogos españoles sobre el uso de los tests

Papeles del Psicologo

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 108-121

  Muñiz, José ^a   Fernández Hermida, José Ramón ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

EFPA; Opinion psychologists; Testing practices; Tests

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950292792     PISSN: 02147823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Bartram, D. (1996). Test qualifications and test use in the UK: The competence approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 62-71.
3. Bartram, D. (1998). The need for international guidelines on standards for test use: A review of European and international initiatives. European Psychologist, 2, 155-163.
4. Bartram, D. y Coyne, I. (1998). Variations in national patterns of testing and test use: The ITC/EFPPA international survey. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 249-260.
5. Bartram, D. y Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.) (2006). Computer-based testing and the Internet. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
6. Bartram, D. y Roe, R. A. (2005). Definition and assessment of competences in the context of the European diploma in psychology. European Psychologist, 10, 93-102.
7. Bennett, R. E. (1999). Using new technology to improve assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and practice. 18(3), 5-12.
8. Bennett, R. E. (2006). Inexorable and inevitable: The continuing story of technology and assessment. En D. Bartram and R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Computer-based testing and the Internet. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. (pp. 201-217).
9. Binet, A. y Simon, T. H. (1905). Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux. L'année Psychologique, 11, 191-244.
10. Breithaupt, K. J., Mills, C. N., y Melican, G. J. (2006). Facing the opportunities of the future. En D. Bartram and R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Computer-based testing and the Internet (pp. 219-251). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
11. Brennan, R. L. (Ed.) (2006). Educational measurement. Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger.
12. Byrne, B. M., Leong, F. T., Hambleton, R. K., Oakland, T., van de Vijver, F. J., y Cheung, F. M. (2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(2), 94-105.
13. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
14. Downing, S. M. y Haladyna, T. M. (Eds.) (2006). Hand-book of test development. Hillsdale, NJ.: LEA.
15. Drasgow, F., Luecht, R. M. y Bennett, R. E. (2006). Technology and testing. En R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement. Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger. (págs. 471-515).
16. European Federation of Professional Psychologists' Associations (2005). Meta-Code of ethics. Brussels: Author (www.efpa.eu).
17. Evers, A. (2001a). Improving test quality in the Netherlands: Results of 18 years of tests ratings. International Journal of Testing, 1, 137-153.
18. Evers. A. (2001b). The revised Dutch rating system for test quality. International Journal of Testing, 1, 155-182.
19. Fernández-Ballesteros, R., De Bruyn, E., Godoy, A., Hornke, L., Ter Laak, J., y Vizcarro, C. et al. (2001). Guidelines for the assessment process (GAP): A proposal for discussion. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 187-200.
20. Ferrando, P. J. y Anguiano, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en Psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33.
21. Goodman, D.P. y Hambleton, R.K. (2004). Student test score reports and interpretive guides: Review of current practices and suggestions for future research. Applied Measurement in Education, 17, 145-220.
22. Hambleton, R. K. (2004). Theory, methods, and practices in testing for the 21st century. Psicothema, 16, 696-701.
23. Hambleton, R. K. (2006). Testing practices in the 21st century. Key Note Address, University of Oviedo, Spain, March 8th.
24. Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., y Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.) (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Londres: LEA.
25. Irvine, S. y Kyllonen, P. (Eds.) (2002). Item generation for test development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington DC: Joint Committee on Testing Practices.
27. Koocher, G. y Kith-Spiegel, P. (2007). Ethics in psychology. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
28. Leach, M. y Oakland, T. (2007). Ethics standards impacting test development and use: A review of 31 ethics codes impacting practices in 35 countries. International Journal of Testing, 7, 71-88.
29. Leeson, H. V. (2006). The mode effect: A literature review of human and technological issues in computerized testing. International Journal of Testing, 6, 1-24.
30. Lindsay, G., Koene, C., Ovreeide H., y Lang, F. (2008). Ethics for European psychologists. Gottingen and Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.
31. Lunt, I. (2005). The implications of the "Bologna process" for the development of a European qualification in psychology. European Psychologist, 10, 86-92.
32. Mills, C.N., Potenza, M.T., Fremer, J.J., y Ward, W.C. (Eds.) (2002). Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
33. Moreland, K. L., Eyde, L. D., Robertson, G. J., Primoff, E. S., y Most, R. B. (1995). Assessment of test user qualifications. American Psychologist, 5, 1, 14-23.
34. Muñiz, J. (1997). Aspectos éticos y deontológicos de la evaluación psicológica. En A. Cordero (Ed.), Evaluación psicológica en el año 2000 (pp. 307-345). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
35. Muñiz, J. y Bartram, D. (2007). Improving international tests and testing. European Psychologist, 12(3), 206-219.
36. Muñiz, J., Bartram, D., Evers, A., Boben, D., Matesic, K., Glabeke, K., Fernández-Hermida, J.R., y Zaal, J. (2001). Testing practices in European countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 201-211.
37. Muñiz, J., y Fernández-Hermida, J.R. (2000). La utilización de los tests en España. Papeles del Psicólogo, 76, 41-49.
38. Muñiz, J., Prieto, G., Almeida, L., y Bartram, D. (1999). Test use in Spain, Portugal and Latin American countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(2), 151-157.
39. Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., y Prieto, G. (1999). Tests informatizados: fundamentos y aplicaciones. Madrid: Pirámide.
40. Papeles del Psicólogo (2009). Número monográfico sobre Ética Profesional y Deontología. Vol. 30, 182-254.
41. Parshall, C.G., Spray, J.A., Kalohn, J.C., y Davey, T. (2002). Practical considerations in computer-based testing. New York: Springer.
42. Peiró, J.M. (2003) La enseñanza de la Psicología en Europa. Un proyecto de Titulación Europea. Papeles del Psicólogo, 86, 25-33
43. Phelps, R. (Ed.) (2005). Defending standardized testing. Londres: LEA.
44. Phelps, R. (Ed.) (2008). Correcting fallacies about educational and psychological testing. Washington: APA.
45. Prieto, G. y Muñiz, J. (2000). Un modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España. Papeles del Psiclogo, 77, 65-71.
46. Shermis, M. D. y Burstein, J. C. (Eds.) (2003). Automated essay scoring. London: LEA.
47. Simner, M. L. (1996). Recommendations by the Canadian Psychological Association for improving the North American safeguards that help protect the public against test misuse. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 72-82.
48. Sireci, S.G. y Zenisky, A.L. (2006). Innovative item formats in computer-based testing: In pursuit of construct representation. En S. M. Downing, y T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development. Hillsdale, NJ.: LEA.
49. Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Zenisky, A.L. y Sireci, S.G. (2002). Technological innovations in large-scale assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 337-362.