Theory, methods, and practices in testing for the 21st century

Psicothema

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 696-701

  Hambleton, Ronald K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746383066     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Brennan, R.L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.
4. Hambleton, R.K., Jodoin, M. and Zenisky, A. (in press). Computer-based test designs and item formats for the next generation of assessments. International Journal of Testing.
5. rd ed., pp. 517-561). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
6. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H. and Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Hambleton, R.K. and Xing, D. (in press). Computer-based test designs with optimal and non-optimal tests for making pass-fail decisions. Applied Measurement in Education.
8. Irvine, S.H. and Kyllonen, P.C. (Eds.). (2002). Item generation for test development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Kolen, M.J. and Brennan, R.L. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10. Lord, P.M. (1952). A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monograph No. 7. Psychometric Society.
11. Lord, P.M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Luecht, R.M. (1998). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 224-236.
13. Luecht, K.M. and Clauser, B.E. (2002). Test models for complex computer-based testing. In C.N. Mills, M.T. Potenza, J.J. Fremer and W. C. Ward (Eds.), Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Mills, C.N., Potenza, M.T., Fremer, J.J. and Ward, W.C. (Eds.), Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Muñiz, J. (1990). Teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Madrid: Pirámide.
16. Muñiz, J. (Ed.) (1996). Psicometría. Madrid: Universitas.
17. Navas, M.J. (Ed.) (2001). Métodos, diseños y técnicas de investigación psicológica. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
18. Olea, J., Ponsoda, V. and Prieto, G. (Eds.) (1999). Tests informatizados: fundamentos y aplicaciones. Madrid: Pirámide.
19. Pitoniak, M. (2002). Automatic item generation methodology in theory and practice (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report No. 444). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Center for Educational Assessment.
20. van der Linden, W.J. and Glas, C.A.W. (Eds.) (2000). Computer adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. van der Linden, W.J. and Hambleton, R.K. (Eds.) (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22. nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Zenisky, A.L. and Sireci, S.G. (2002), Technological innovations in large-scale assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 75(4), 337-362.