Prevalence and correlates of recent and repeat mammography among California women ages 55-79

Cancer Epidemiology

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 168-177

  Rakowski, William ^a   Wyn, Roberta ^b   Breen, Nancy ^c   Meissner, Helen ^c   Clark, Melissa A ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral science; Cancer screening; Mammography; Preventive health services; Women's health

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORBIDITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT CARE; POVERTY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOKING; UNITED STATES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77950263415     PISSN: 18777821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Cancer Society. California cancer facts and Figures 2007. Oakland, CA: American Cancer Society, California Division and Public Health Institute, California Cancer Registry; September 2006.
2. Clark M.A., Rakowski W., and Bonacore L.B. Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment. Ann Behav Med 26 3 (2003) 201-211
3. Lipkus I.M., Rimer B.K., and Strigo T.S. Relationships among objective and subjective risk for breast cancer and mammography stages of change. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5 12 (1996) 1005-1011
4. Mayer J.A., Lewis E.C., Slymen D.J., Dullum J., Kurata H., Holbrook A., et al. Patient reminder letters to promote annual mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 31 4 (2000) 315-322
5. Andersen M.R., Yasui Y., Meischke H., Kuniyuki A., Etzioni R., and Urban N. The effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Am J Prev Med 18 3 (2000) 199-207
6. Clark M.A., Rakowski W., Ehrich B., Rimer B.K., Velicer W.F., Dube C.E., et al. The effect of a stage-matched and tailored intervention on repeat mammography(1). Am J Prev Med 22 1 (2002) 1-7
7. Blanchard K., Colbert J.A., Puri D., Weissman J., Moy B., Kopans D.B., et al. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival. Cancer 101 3 (2004) 495-507
8. Magai C., Consedine N., Conway F., Neugut A., and Culver C. Diversity matters: unique populations of women and breast cancer screening. Cancer 100 11 (2004) 2300-2307
9. Harrison R.V., Janz N.K., Wolfe R.A., Tedeschi P.J., Huang X., and McMahon Jr. L.F. 5-Year mammography rates and associated factors for older women. Cancer 97 5 (2003) 1147-1155
10. Rahman S.M., Dignan M.B., and Shelton B.J. Factors influencing adherence to guidelines for screening mammography among women aged 40 years and older. Ethn Dis 13 4 (2003) 477-484
11. Otero-Sabogal R., Owens D., Canchola J., Golding J.M., Tabnak F., and Fox P. Mammography rescreening among women of diverse ethnicities: patient, provider, and health care system factors. J Health Care Poor Underserved 15 3 (2004) 390-412
12. Carney P.A., Goodrich M.E., Mackenzie T., Weiss J.E., Poplack S.P., Wells W.S., et al. Utilization of screening mammography in New Hampshire: a population-based assessment. Cancer 104 8 (2005) 1726-1732
13. Quinley J., Mahotiere T., Messina C.R., Lee T.K., and Mikail C. Mammography-facility-based patient reminders and repeat mammograms for Medicare in New York State. Prev Med 38 1 (2004) 20-27
14. Rakowski W., Lipkus I.M., Clark M.A., Rimer B.K., Ehrich B., Lyna P.R., et al. Reminder letter, tailored stepped-care, and self-choice comparison for repeat mammography. Am J Prev Med 25 4 (2003) 308-314
15. Rosenberg L., Wise L.A., Palmer J.R., Horton N.J., and ms-Campbell L.L. A multilevel study of socioeconomic predictors of regular mammography use among African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14 11 Pt 1 (2005) 2628-2633
16. Bobo J.K., Shapiro J.A., Schulman J., and Wolters C.L. On-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13 4 (2004) 620-630
17. Rakowski W., Breen N., Meissner H., Rimer B.K., Vernon S.W., Clark M.A., et al. Prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography among women aged 55-79 in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med 39 1 (2004) 1-10
18. Rakowski W., Meissner H., Vernon S.W., Breen N., Rimer B., and Clark M.A. Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45-75 in the 2002-2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 11 (2006) 2093-2101
19. Rakowski W., Truchil R., Schneider K., Meersman S., and Clark M.A. Correlates of mammography in a national analysis compared to results in quintile- and regionally-defined samples. Prev Med 42 5 (2006) 386-389
20. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series report 1: sample design. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2002.
21. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2005 methodology series report 1: sample design. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2007.
22. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2001 methodology series report 2: data collection methods. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2002.
23. California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2005 methodology series report 4: response rates. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2007.
24. Andersen R.M. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?. J Health Soc Behav 36 1 (1995) 1-10
25. Sallis J.F., and Owen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K., Rimer B.K., and Lewis F.M. (Eds). Health Behavior And Health Education: Theory, Research, And Practice (2002), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 462-484
26. Gail M.H., Brinton L.A., Byar D.P., Corle D.K., Green S.B., Schairer C., et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81 24 (1989) 1879-1886
27. Costantino J.P., Gail M.H., Pee D., Anderson S., Redmond C.K., Benichou J., et al. Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 91 18 (1999) 1541-1548
28. Freedman A.N., Graubard B.I., Rao S.R., McCaskill-Stevens W., Ballard-Barbash R., and Gail M.H. Estimates of the number of U.S. women who could benefit from tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 (2003) 526-532
29. Meersman S.C., Breen N., Pickle L.W., Meissner H.I., and Simon P. Access to mammography screening in a large urban population: a multilevel analysis. Cancer Causes Control 20 8 (2009) 1469-1482
30. Lian M., Jeffe D.B., and Schootman M. Racial and geographic differences in mammography screening in St. Louis City: a multilevel study. J Urban Health 85 5 (2008) 677-692
31. Lian M., Schootman M., and Yun S. Geographic variation and effect of area-level poverty rate on colorectal cancer screening. BMC Public Health 8 (2008) p358
32. Jackson M.C., Davis W.W., Waldron W., McNeel T.S., Pfeiffer R., and Breen N. Impact of geography on mammography use in California. Cancer Causes Control 20 8 (2009) 1339-1353
33. Rakowski W., Clark M.A., Rogers M.L., and Weitzen S. Investigating reversals of association for utilization of recent mammography among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black women. Cancer Causes Control (2009)
34. Rauscher G.H., Johnson T.P., Cho Y.I., and Walk J.A. Accuracy of self-reported cancer screening histories: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17 4 (2008) 748-757