Effect of fluorination on the molecule-substrate interactions of pentacene/Cu(1 0 0) interfaces

Chemical Physics Letters

Volumn 490, Issue 1-3, 2010, Pages 54-57

  de Oteyza, D G ^a,b   Wakayama, Y ^b   Liu, X ^c   Yang, W ^c   Cook, P L ^d   Himpsel, F J ^d   Ortega, J E ^a,e,f  

^a DONOSTIA INTERNATIONAL PHYSICS CENTER DIPC   (Spain)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^f CENTRO MIXTO CSIC UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AZIMUTHAL ANISOTROPY; CU(1 0 0); INTERACTION MECHANISMS; METAL-ORGANIC INTERFACE; NEAR EDGE X RAY ABSORPTION FINE STRUCTURE; PENTACENES; PERFLUORINATION; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY (STM); SUBSTRATE INTERACTION;

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; ELECTRON MOBILITY; ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; FLUORINATION; FLUORINE; HALOGENATION; MOLECULES; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; SEMICONDUCTING ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 77950258927     PISSN: 00092614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Babudri F., Farinola G.M., Naso F., and Ragni R. Chem. Commun. 1003 (2007)
2. Bao Z., Lovinger A.J., and Brown J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 207
3. Peisert H., Knupfer M., Schwieger T., Fuentes G.G., Olligs D., Fink J., and Schmidt Th. J. Appl. Phys. 93 (2003) 9683
4. Brinkmann H., Kelting C., Makarov S., Tsaryova O., Schnurpfeil G., Wöhrle D., and Schlettwein D. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 205 (2008) 409
5. Sakamoto Y., et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 8138
6. Koch N., Vollmer A., Duhm S., Sakamoto Y., and Suzuki T. Adv. Mater. 19 (2007) 112
7. Duhm S., et al. Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 045418
8. Salzmann I., et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 12870
9. Kowarik S., et al. Phys. Stat. Sol. (rrl) 2 (2008) 120
10. Salzmann I., et al. Langmuir 24 (2008) 7294
11. Ruiz Delgado M.C., et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 1502
12. Chen H.-Y., and Chao I. Chem. Phys. Lett. 401 (2005) 539
13. Koch N., et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 7300
14. Wang J.-Z., Sadowski J.T., Xiong Z.-H., Fujikawa Y., Xue Q.K., and Sakurai T. Nanotechnology 20 (2009) 095704
15. Gavioli L., Fanetti M., Sancrotti M., and Betti M.G. Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 035458
16. Krauss T.N., Barrena E., Dosch H., and Wakayama Y. ChemPhysChem 10 (2009) 2445
17. Fanetti M., Gavioli L., and Sancrotti M. Adv. Mater. 18 (2006) 2863
18. Dou W., Zhu J., Liao Q., Zhang H., He P., and Bao S. J. Chem. Phys. 128 (2008) 244706
19. Zhang X.N., de Oteyza D.G., Wakayama Y., and Dosch H. Surf. Sci. 603 (2009) 3179
20. Ferretti A., Baldacchini C., Calzolari A., Felice R.D., Ruini A., Molinari E., and Betti M.G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 046802
21. Baldacchini C., Allegretti F., Gunnella R., and Betti M.G. Surf. Sci. 601 (2007) 2603
22. Alagia M., et al. J. Chem. Phys. 122 (2005) 124305
23. It is important to note that, independently of the model used to fit the monolayer data (e.g. with less components), the bilayer data give direct evidence of strong changes in the core-level structure of the second layer, with pronounced shape changes beyond a rigid shift of the monolayer components that could arise from e.g. diminished screening effects.
24. de Oteyza D.G., et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 (2009) 3567
25. de Oteyza D.G., et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 (2009) 259
26. Lukas S., Söhnchen S., Witte G., and Wöll Ch. ChemPhysChem 5 (2004) 266
27. Käfer D., Ruppel L., and Witte G. Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 085309
28. Chiodi M., et al. Phys. Rev. B 77 (2008) 115321