Empirical support for the generation of domain-oriented quality models

IET Software

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-14

  Villalba, M T ^a   Fernandez Sanz L ^b   Martinez J J ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION DOMAINS; EMPIRICAL METHOD; IT PROFESSIONAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; QUALITY MODELS; REDUNDANT INFORMATIONS; SECURITY SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS; SOFTWARE QUALITY EVALUATION; SOFTWARE QUALITY MODELS; SYSTEMATIC METHOD;

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; SECURITY OF DATA;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

EID: 77950252927     PISSN: 17518806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1049/iet-sen.2009.0040     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Fenton, N., and Pfleeger, S.L.: ' Software metrics: a rigorous and practical approach ', 2nd edn. (PWS Publishing Co., Boston, MA, USA, 1997)
2. ' Software engineering - product quality - Part 1: quality model ', (International Standards Organization, Geneva, 2001)
3. Kitchenham, B., and Pfleeger, S.L.: ' Software quality: the elusive target ', IEEE Softw., 1996, 13, (1), p. 12-21 0740-7459
4. Dromey, R.G.: ' Cornering the chimera ', IEEE Softw., 1996, 13, (1), p. 33-43 0740-7459
5. Procedures for performing systematic reviews ', Technical Report TR/SE0401, 2004, Keele University, and Technical Report 0400011T.1, National ICT Australia
6. Hall, M.J.J., Hall, R., and Zeleznikow, J.: ' A process for evaluating legal knowledge-based systems based upon the context criteria contingency-guidelines framework ', Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence and Law, Scotland, United Kingdom, 2003
7. Losavio, F., Matteo, A., and Rahamut, R.: ' Web services domain analysis based on quality standards ', Software architecture, (SpringerLink, 2008), (LNCS)
8. Helmut, N., Benjamin, Z., and Jens, G.: ' An approach to quality engineering of TTCN-3 test specifications ', Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf., 2008, 10, (4), p. 309-326 1433-2779
9. Malak, G., Badri, L., Badri, M., and Sahraoui, H.: ' Towards a multidimensional model for web-based applications quality assessment ', Bauknecht, K., Bichler, M., Pröll, B., E-Commerce and web technologies: computer science journal, (Springer, 2004), p. 316-327
10. Moraga, M.Á., Calero, C., Garzás, J., and Piattini, M.: ' Assessment of portlet quality: collecting real experience. Computer standards and interfaces ', Elsevier Science, 2009, 31, (2), p. 336-347
11. Perez, L.S.V., Tornes, A.F.G., and Riveron, E.M.F.: ' MECRAD: model and tool for the technical quality evaluation of software products in visual environment ', The Third International Multi-Conf., 2008, Computing in the Global Information Technology, p. 107-112, 2008 ICCGI'08
12. Strahonja, V.: ' The evaluation criteria of workflow metamodels ', ITI 2007, 29th Int. Conf., 2007, Information Technology Interfaces, p. 553-558
13. YeongSeok, L., JungHyun, B., and Seokkoo, S.: ' Development of quality evaluation metrics for BPM (Business Process Management) system ', Proc. Fourth Annual ACIS Int. Conf. Computer and Information Science, 2005
14. Sangeeta, N., and Hausi, A.M.: ' Quality criteria and an analysis framework for self-healing systems ', Proc. 29th Int. Conf. Software Engineering Workshops, 2007
15. Franch, X., and Carvallo, J.P.: ' Using quality models in software package selection ', Softw. IEEE, 2003, 20, (1), p. 34-41
16. Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X., Quer, C., and Rodríguez, N.: ' A framework for selecting workflow tools in the context of composite information systems ', Lecture notes in computer science, database and expert systems applications, (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2004), p. 109-119
17. Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X., and Quer, C.: ' Defining a quality model for mail servers ', Proc. Second Int. Conf. COTS-Based Software Systems, 2003
18. Franch, X., and Carvallo, J.P.: ' A quality-model-based approach for describing and evaluating software packages ', Proc. 10th Anniversary IEEE Joint Int. Conf. Requirements Engineering, 2002
19. Botella, P., Burgués, X., Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X., Pastor, J.A., and Quer, C.: ' Towards a quality model for the selection of ERP systems ', Component-based software quality, (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2003), p. 225-245, (LNCS, 2693)
20. Carvallo, J.P., and Franch, X.: ' Extending the ISO/IEC 9126-1 quality model with non-technical factors for COTS components selection ', Proc. 2006 Int. Workshop on Software Quality, Shanghai, China, 2006
21. Franch, X., Quer, C., Canton, J., and Salietti, R.: ' Experience report on the construction of quality models for some content management software domains ', Proc. Seventh Int. Conf. Composition-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS 2008), 2008
22. Oh, G.O., Kim, D.Y., Kim, S.I., and Rhew, S.Y.: ' A quality evaluation technique of RFID middleware in ubiquitous computing ', Proc. 2006 Int. Conf. Hybrid Information Technology, 2006, 2
23. Won, J.S., Ji, H.K., and Sung, Y.R.: ' A quality model for open source software selection ', Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Advanced Language Processing and Web Information Technology (ALPIT 2007), 2007
24. Lee, K., and Lee, S.J.: ' A quantitative evaluation model using the ISO/IEC 9126 quality model in the component based development process ', Proc. 2006 Int. Conf. Computational Science and its Applications (ICCSA 2006), Scotland, 2006, p. 917-926, (LNCS)
25. Stefan, W., and Florian, D.: ' An integrated approach to quality modelling ', Proc. Fifth Int. Workshop on Software Quality, 2007
26. Behkamal, B., Kahani, M., and Akbari, M.K.: ' Customizing ISO 9126 quality model for evaluation of B2B applications ', Elsevier Infor. Softw. Technol. J., 2009, 51, (3), p. 599-609
27. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., and Berry, L.L.: ' SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer for perceptions of service quality ', J. Retail., 1988, 64, p. 12-40
28. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., and Berry, L.L.: ' A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research ', J. Mark., 1985, 70, (3), p. 201-230
29. Lingyu, W., Anoop, S., and Sushil, J.: ' Toward measuring network security using attack graphs ', Proc. 2007 ACM Workshop on Quality of Protection, Alexandria, VA, USA, 2007
30. Kunda, D.: ' STACE: social technical approach to COTS software evaluation ', Cechich, A., Piattini, M., Vallecillo, A., 'Component-based software quality: computer science journal' (Springer, 2003), p. 64-84
31. Torchiano, M., Jaccheri, L., Sørensen, C.F., and Wang, A.I.: ' COTS products characterization ', Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Ischia, Italy, 2002
32. Kunda, D., and Brooks, L.: ' Identifying and classifying processes (traditional and soft factors) that support COTS component selection: a case study ', Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 2000, 9, (4), p. 226-234 0960-085X
33. ' Information technology - security techniques - evaluation criteria for IT security - Part 2: security functional requirements ', 1st edn. (International Standards Organization, Geneva, 2005)
34. Software engineering - software product quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) - requirements for quality of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software product and instructions for testing ', 1st edn. (International Standards Organization, Geneva, 2006)
35. Information technology - security techniques - evaluation criteria for IT security ', 1st edn. (International Standards Organization, Geneva, 2005)
36. ISO/IEC 9126-2'2003 - software engineering - product quality - Part 2: external metrics ', (International Standards Organization, Geneva, 2003)
37. ' Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 110: dialogue principles ', (International Standards Organization, Geneva, 2006)
38. ' Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: guidance on usability ', (International Standards Organization, Geneva, 1998)
39. Kontio, J., Caldiera, G., and Basili, V.R.: ' Defining factors, goals and criteria for reusable component evaluation ', Proc. 1996 Conf. Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1996
40. Ochs, M., Pfahl, D., Chrobok-Diening, G., and Nothhelfer-Kolb, B.: ' A method for efficient measurement-based COTS assessment and selection - method description and evaluation results ', Proc. Seventh Int. Symp. Software Metrics, 2001
41. Comella-Dorda, S., Dean, J.C., Morris, E., and Oberndorf, P.: ' A process for COTS software product evaluation ', First Int. Conf. ICCBSS 2002, Orlando, USA, 2002, p. 86-96
42. Lawlis, P.K., Mark, K.E., Thomas, D.A., and Courtheyn, T.: ' A formal process for evaluating COTS software products ', IEEE Comput., 2001, 34, (5), p. 58-63
43. Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X., and Quer, C.: ' Managing non-technical requirements in COTS components selection ', Proc. 14th IEEE Int. Requirements Engineering Conf. (RE'06), 2006, p. 316-321
44. ' Workshop on COTS-based systems ', Special Report: CMU/SEI-97-SR-019, November, 1997, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
45. ' A process for COTS software product evaluation ', Technical Report CMU/SEI-2003-TR-017 ESC-TR-2003-017, 2004, Carnegie Mellon, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh
46. Koyani, S.J., Bailey, R.W., and Nall, J.R.: ' Research-based web design and usability guidelines: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services ', 2006, http://www.usability.gov/pdfs/guidelines.html, accessed
47. Kirakowski, J., and Corbett, M.: ' SUMI: the software usability measurement inventory ', Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1993, 24, p. 210-212 0007-1013
48. Gediga, G., Hamborg, K.-C., and Düntsch, I.: ' The isometrics usability inventory. An operationalisation of ISO 9241-10 supporting summative and formative evaluation of software systems ', Behav. Infor. Technol., 1999, 18, (3), p. 151-164
49. Standard for a software quality metrics methodology ', (IEEE Computer Society, 1998)
50. Obeso, M.E.A.: ' Metodología de Medición y Evaluación de la Usabilidad en Sitios Web Educativos ', (Universidad De Oviedo, Oviedo, 2005)
51. Pérez, L.S.V., and Tornés, A.F.G.: ' MECHDAV - a quality model for the technical evaluation of applications development tools in visual environments ', (Software measurement European Forum, SMEF 2005, Rome, Italy, 2005), p. 155-163
52. Avizienis, A., Laprie, J.-C., Randell, B., and Landwehr, C.: ' Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing ', IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput., 2004, 1, (1), p. 11-33 10.1109/TDSC.2004.2 1545-5971
53. Bertoa, M., and Vallecillo, A.: ' Atributos de calidad para componentes COTS ', Proc. IDEAS'02, La Habana, Cuba, 2002, p. 352-363
54. Morisio, M., and Torchiano, M.: ' Definition and classification of COTS: a proposal ', ICCBSS'02: Proc. First Int. Conf. COTS-based Software Systems, London, UK, 2002, p. 165-175
55. Villalba, M.T., and Fernández-Sanz, L.: ' Technical report - evaluation report of Internet Security and Acceleration (ISA) Server 2006 ', November, 2007, 14, p. 78-81, Security, European Security
56. Technical report - evaluation report of Cryptosec 2048, June, 2007, p. 78-81, eSecurity, European Security, vol. 13
57. Technical report - evaluation report of Internet Application Gateway (IAG) 2007, June, 2008, p. 53-57, eSecurity, European Security, vol. 18
58. Hair, J.F., Tatham, R.L., Anderson, R.E., and Black, W.: ' Multivariate data analysis ', 5th edn. (Prentice Hall, 1998)
59. Thomsen, E.: ' Olap solutions: building multidimensional information systems ', (Wiley, 2002)
60. Nunnally, J., and Bernstein, I.: ' Psychometric theory ', (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994)
61. Flynn, P., Curran, K., and Lunney, T.: ' A decision support system for telecommunications ', Int. J. Netw. Manag., 2002, 12, (2), p. 69-80
62. Tabachnick, B.G., and Fidell, L.S.: ' Using multivariate statistics ', 5th edn. (Allyn & Bacon, Pearson Education, 2006)
63. Hu, L., and Bentler, P.M.: ' Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives ', Struct. Equation Model., 1999, 6, (1), p. 1-55
64. Veenendaal, E.P.W.M.V., and Trienekens, J.J.M.: ' Testing based on users' quality needs ', IFIP TC5 WG54 Third Int. Conf. Reliability, Quality and Safety of Software-intensive Systems, Athens, Greece, 1997
65. Punter, T., Solingen, R.V., and Trienekens, J.: ' Software product evaluation - current status and future needs for customers and industry ', Fourth IT Evaluation Conf. (EVIT-97), The Netherlands, Delft, 1997