Cell confinement in patterned nanoliter droplets in a microwell array by wiping

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 547-557

  Kang, Lifeng ^a,b,c   Hancock, Matthew J ^a,b   Brigham, Mark D ^a,b   Khademhosseini, Ali ^a,b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Cell seeding; High throughput; Microfluidics; Microwell arrays; Nanoliter droplets

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS; CELL CONCENTRATIONS; CELL DENSITY; CELL SEEDING; CELL SEEDING DENSITY; CELL-PATTERNING; DESIGN PARAMETERS; DRUG DISCOVERY; ENABLING TOOLS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; HIGH-THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS; MICRO WELLS; MICRO-SCALES; MICROWELL GEOMETRIES; NANOLITERS; NEW HIGH; ROBUST METHODS; SCREENING APPLICATION; SEED CELLS; THEORETICAL MODELS;

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; DROP FORMATION; MICROCHANNELS; MICROFLUIDICS; THROUGHPUT; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

CELL IMMOBILIZATION;

POLYMER; SILANE;

ARTICLE; CELL; CELL COUNT; CELL DENSITY; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HYDROPHILICITY; MICROFLUIDICS; TECHNIQUE;

ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; DRUG DISCOVERY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; MICE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; POLYMERS; SILANES;

EID: 77950245758     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32557     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Fox S, Farr-Jones S, Sopchak L, Boggs A, Nicely HW, Khoury R, Biros M. High-throughput screening: Update on practices and success. J Biomol Screen 2006;11:864-869.
2. Sills MA. Future considerations in HTS: The acute effect of chronic dilemmas. Drug Discov Today 1998;3:304-312.
3. Kang L, Chung BG, Langer R, Khademhosseini A. Micro.uidics for drug discovery and development: From target selection to product lifecycle management. Drug Discov Today 2008;13:1-13.
4. Khademhosseini A, Langer R, Borenstein J, Vacanti JP. Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:2480-2487.
5. Karp JM, Yeh J, Eng G, Fukuda J, Blumling J, Suh KY, Cheng J, Mahdavi A, Borenstein J, Langer R, Khademhosseini A. Controlling size, shape and homogeneity of embryoid bodies using poly(ethylene glycol) microwells. Lab Chip 2007;7:786-794.
6. Moeller HC, Mian MK, Shrivastava S, Chung BG, Khademhosseini A. A microwell array system for stem cell culture. Biomaterials 2008;29:752-763.
7. Flaim CJ, Chien S, Bhatia SN. An extracellular matrix microarray for probing cellular differentiation. Nat Methods 2005; 2:119-125.
8. Saunders RE, Gough JE, Derby B. Delivery of human .broblast cells by piezoelectric drop-on-demand inkjet printing. Biomaterials 2008;29:193-203.
9. Boland T, Xu T, Damon B, Cui X. Application of inkjet printing to tissue engineering. Biotechnol J 2006;1:910-917.
10. Mironov V, Kasyanov V, Drake C, Markwald RR. Organ printing: Promises and challenges. Regen Med 2008;3:93-103.
11. Demirci U. Acoustic picoliter droplets for emerging applications in semiconductor industry and biotechnology. J Microelectromech Syst 2006;15:957-966.
12. Demirci U, Montesano G. Single cell epitaxy by acoustic picolitre droplets. Lab Chip 2007;7:1139-1145.
13. Luo C, Li H, Xiong C, Peng X, Kou Q, Chen Y, Ji H, Ouyang Q. The combination of optical tweezers and microwell array for cells physical manipulation and localization in micro.uidic device. Biomed Microdevices 2007;9:573-578.
14. Hong JW, Quake SR. Integrated nanoliter systems. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21:1179-1183.
15. Steinert CP, Kalkandjiev K, Zengerle R, Koltay P. TopSpot((R)) Vario: A novel microarrayer system for highly flexible and highly parallel picoliter dispensing. Biomed Microdevices 2009;11:755-761.
16. Khademhosseini A, Ferreira L, Blumling J III, Yeh J, Karp JM, Fukuda J, Langer R. Co-culture of human embryonic stem cells with murine embryonic .broblasts on microwellpatterned substrates. Biomaterials 2006;27:5968-5977.
17. Park MC, Hur JY, Kwon KW, Park SH, Suh KY. Pumpless, selective docking of yeast cells inside a microfluidic channel induced by receding meniscus. Lab Chip 2006;6: 988-994.
18. Suh KY, Khademhosseini A, Jon S, Langer R. Direct confinement of individual viruses within polyethylene glycol (PEG) nanowells. Nano Lett 2006;6:1196-1201.
19. Nagy A, Rossant J, Nagy R, Abramow-Newerly W, Roder JC. Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:8424-8428.
20. Bodas D, Khan-Malek C. Hydrophilization and hydrophobic recovery of PDMS by oxygen plasma and chemical treatment - An SEM investigation. Sens Actuators B Chem 2007; 123:368-373.
21. Lee JN, Park C, Whitesides GM. Solvent compatibility of poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based micro.uidic devices. Anal Chem 2003;75:6544-6554.
22. Cong H, Revzin A, Pan T. Non-adhesive PEG hydrogel nanostructures for self-assembly of highly ordered colloids. Nanotechnology 2009;20:075307-075315.
23. Kalakkunnath S, Kalika DS, Lin H, Freeman BD. Viscoelastic characteristics of UV polymerized poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate networks with varying extents of crosslinking. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2006;44:2058-2070.
24. Berthier E, Warrick J, Yu H, Beebe DJ. Managing evaporation for more robust microscale assays. I. Volume loss in high throughput assays. Lab Chip 2008;8:852-859.
25. deGennes P, Brochard-Wyart F, Quéré D. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomenon. Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves. New York: Springer; 2003.
26. Acheson DJ. Elementary Fluid Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
27. Croughan MS, Sayre ES, Wang DI. Viscous reduction of turbulent damage in animal cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 1989;33:862-872.
28. Gorczynski RM, Miller RG, Phillips RA. Homogeneity of antibody-producing cells as analysed by their buoyant density in gradients of Ficoll. Immunology 1970;19:817-829.
29. Higdon JJL. Stokes flow in arbitrary two-dimensional domains: Shear flow over ridges and cavities. J Fluid Mech 1985;159:195-226.
30. Liu CH, Joseph DD. Stokes flow in wedge-shaped trenches. J Fluid Mech 2006;80:443-463.
31. Shankar PN, Deshpande MD. Fluid mechanics in the driven cavity. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2000;32:93-136.
32. Taneda S. Visualization of separating Stokes flows. J Physical Soc Japan 1979;46:1935-1942.
33. Shankar PN. Three-dimensional eddy structure in a cylindrical container. J Fluid Mech 1997;342:97-118.
34. Manbachi A, Shrivastava S, Cioffi M, Chung BG, Moretti M, Demirci U, Yliperttula M, Khademhosseini A. Microcirculation within grooved substrates regulates cell positioning and cell docking inside micro.uidic channels. Lab Chip 2008;8:747-754.
35. Hartmann M, Sjodahl J, Stjernstrom M, Redeby J, Joos T, Roeraade J. Non-contact protein microarray fabrication using a procedure based on liquid bridge formation. Anal Bioanal Chem 2009;393:591-598.
36. Binkert A, Studer P, Voros J. A microwell array platform for picoliter membrane protein assays. Small 2009;5:1070-1077.
37. Taylor LC, Walt DR. Application of high-density optical microwell arrays in a live-cell biosensing system. Anal Biochem 2000;278:132-142.