The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in ontario hospital-based long-term care residents

Medical Care

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 380-387

  Lam, Jonathan M C ^a   Wodchis, Walter P ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Health status index; Long term care; Minimum data set; Preference based health related quality of life

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; APHASIA; ARTICLE; BALANCE IMPAIRMENT; CANADA; CAREGIVER; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATABASES AS TOPIC; DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES;

EID: 77950229911     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca2647     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Franks P, Hanmer J, Fryback DG. Relative disutilities of 47 risk factors and conditions assessed with seven preference-based health status measures in a national US sample: toward consistency in cost-effectiveness analyses. Med Care. 2006;44:478-485.
2. Saarni SI, Harkanen T, Sintonen H, et al. The impact of 29 chronic conditions on health-related quality of life: a general population survey in Finland using 15D and EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1403-1414.
3. Schultz SE, Kopec JA. Impact of chronic conditions. Health Rep. 2003;14:41-53.
4. Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. Health-related quality of life by disease and socio-economic group in the general population in Sweden. Health Policy. 2001;55:51-69.
5. Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF, Ghushchyan V. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care. 2005;43:736-749.
6. Fryback DG, Dasbach EJ, Klein R, et al. The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-state quality factors. Med Decis Making. 1993;13:89-102.
7. Mittmann N, Trakas K, Risebrough N, et al. Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15:369-376.
8. Wodchis WP, Hirdes JP, Feeny DH. Health-related quality of life measure based on the minimum data set. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:490-506.
9. Hirdes JP, Fries BE, Morris JN, et al. Integrated health information systems based on the RAI/MDS series of instruments. Healthc Manage Forum. 1999;12:30-40.
10. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Complex Continuing Care Co-payment 2008. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2008. Available at: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/ public/pub/chronic/chronic. html. Accessed October 28 2008.
11. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Selected Diseases/Conditions by Age, Ontario Complex Continuing Care 2005-2006. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2006. Available at: http://secure.cihi.ca/ cihiweb/en/statistics-ccrs-2007-tab3-e.html. Accessed October 31 2008.
12. Wodchis WP, Maxwell CJ, Venturini A, et al. Study of observed and self-reported HRQL in older frail adults found group-level congruence and individual-level differences. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:502-511.
13. Sgadari A, Morris JN, Fries BE, et al. Efforts to establish the reliability of the resident assessment instrument. Age Ageing. 1997;26(suppl 2): 27-30.
14. Hawes C, Morris JN, Phillips CD, et al. Reliability estimates for the minimum data set for nursing home resident assessment and care screening (MDS). Gerontologist. 1995;35:172-178.
15. Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33:344-349.
16. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. The health utilities index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54.
17. Hirdes JP, Frijters DH, Teare GF. The MDS-CHESS scale: a new measure to predict mortality in institutionalized older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:96-100.
18. Hartmaier SL, Sloane PD, Guess HA, et al. Validation of the minimum data set cognitive performance scale: agreement with the mini-mental state examination. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:M128-M133.
19. Williams BC, Fries BE, Foley WJ, et al. Activities of daily living and costs in nursing homes. Health Care Financ Rev. 1994;15:117-135.
20. Morris JN, Fries BE, Morris SA. Scaling ADLs within the MDS. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54:M546-M553.
21. Wang Q, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. How robust is the health utilities index mark 2 utility function? Med Decis Making. 2002;22:350.
22. Fryback DG, Dunham NC, Palta M, et al. US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study. Med Care. 2007;45:1162-1170.
23. Maddigan SL, Feeny DH, Johnson JA; DOVE Investigators. A comparison of the health utilities indices mark 2 and mark 3 in type 2 diabetes. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:489-501.
24. Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Feeny DH. Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:207-219.
25. Jones CA, Feeny DH. Agreement between patient and proxy responses of health-related quality of life after hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1227-1233.
26. Nyman JA, Barleen NA, Dowd BE, et al. Quality-of-life weights for the US population: self-reported health status and priority health conditions, by demographic characteristics. Med Care. 2007;45:618-628.
27. Neumann PJ, Kuntz KM, Leon J, et al. Health utilities in Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study of patients and caregivers. Med Care. 1999;37:27-32.
28. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine: Report of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
29. Stewart ST, Woodward RM, Rosen AB, et al. The impact of symptoms and impairments on overall health in US national health data. Med Care. 2008;46:954-962.
30. Hill-Westmoreland EE, Gruber-Baldini AL. Falls documentation in nursing homes: agreement between the minimum data set and chart abstractions of medical and nursing documentation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:268-273.
31. Wodchis WP, Naglie G, Teare GF. Validating diagnostic information on the minimum data set in Ontario hospital-based long-term care. Med Care. 2008;46:882-887.
32. Martin JL, Alessi CA. Limited validity of minimum data set items on sleep and hypnotic use in predicting falls and hip fracture in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1150-1151.
33. Arling G, Kane RL, Lewis T, et al. Future development of nursing home quality indicators. Gerontologist. 2005;45:147-156.
34. Mor V, Angelelli J, Gifford D, et al. Benchmarking and quality in residential and nursing homes: lessons from the US. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18:258-266.