Another look at "look-alikes": Can judges match belongings with their owners?

Journal of Individual Differences

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 38-41

  Alpers, Georg W ^a   Gerdes, Antje B M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Matching; Observers' impression; Personal appearance; Personal belongings

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950195261     PISSN: 16140001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.27.1.38     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alvarez L., Jaffe K. Narcissism guides mate selection: Humans mate assortatively, as revealed by facial resemblance, following an algorithm of " self seeking like." Evolutionary Psychology 2004, 2:177-194.
2. Amaturo E., Costagliola S., Ragone G. Furnishing and status attributes: A sociological study of the living room. Environment and Behaviour 1987, 19:228-249.
3. Ambady N., Hallahan M., Conner B. Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:538-547.
4. Ambady N., Rosenthal R. Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 111:256-274.
5. Anderson C.L., Winn D.G., Agran P.F. Differences between pickup truck and automobile driver-owners. Accident Analysis and Prevention 1999, 31:67-76.
6. Belk R.W., Bahn K.D., Mayer R.N. Developmental recognition of consumption symbolism. Journal of Consumer Research 1982, 9:4-17.
7. Belk R.W., Mayer R.N., Bahn K.D. The eye of the beholder: Individual differences in perceptions of consumption symbolism. Advances in Consumer Research 1982, 9:523-530.
8. Bressan P., Martello M.F. Talis pater, talis filius: Perceived resemblance and the belief in genetic relatedness. Psychological Science 2002, 13:213-218.
9. Cammisa M.X., Williams A.F., Leaf W.A. Vehicles driven by teenagers in four states. Journal of Safety Research 1999, 30:25-30.
10. Davies G.M., Patel D. The influence of car and driver stereotypes on attributions of vehicle speed, position on the road, and culpability in a road accident scenario. Legal and Criminological Psychology 2005, 10:45-62.
11. Gibbins K., Coney J.R. Effect of automobile body styles on perceived characteristics of their owners. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1982, 55:1051-1054.
12. Gosling S.D., Ko S.J., Morris M.E., Thomas M. A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:379-398.
13. Grubb E.L., Hupp G. Perception of self, generalized stereotypes, and brand selection. Journal of Marketing Research 1968, V:58-63.
14. Heath A.P., Scott D. The self-concept and image congruence hypothesis: An empirical evaluation in the motor vehicle market. European Journal of Marketing 1998, 32:1110-1123.
15. Hsieh M.-H., Lindridge A. Universal appeals with local specifications. Journal of Product & Brand Management 2005, 14:14-28.
16. Kenny D.A., Horner C., Kashy D.A., Chu L. Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 62:88-97.
17. Levine D.W. Do dogs resemble their owners? A reanalysis of Roy and Christenfeld (2004). Psychological Science 2005, 16:83-84.
18. McElroy J.C., Morrow P.C., Ackerman R.J. Personality and interior office design: Exploring the accuracy of visitor attributions. Journal of Applied Psychology 1983, 68:541-545.
19. Payne C., Jaffe K. Self seeks like: Many humans choose their dog pets following rules used for assortative mating. Journal of Ethology 2005, 23:15-18.
20. Roy M.M., Christenfeld N.J.S. Dogs still do resemble their owners. Psychological Science 2005, 16:743-744.
21. Roy M.M., Christenfeld N.J.S. Do dogs resemble their owners?. Psychological Science 2004, 15:361-363.