‘Trying to do a jigsaw without the picture on the box’: Understanding the challenges of care integration in the context of single assessment for older people in England

International Journal of Integrated Care

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Wilson, Rob ^a   Baines, Susan ^b   Cornford, James ^b   Martin, Mike ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health services; Healthcare; Healthcare management; Healthcare networks; Integrated care

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950157784     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15684156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/ijic.186     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Minford M. The boundaries between health and social care for older people in developed economies. London: The Nuffield Trust; 2001.
2. Reed J, Cook G, Childs S, McCormack B. A literature review to explore integrated care for older people. International Journal of Integrated Care wserial onlinex 2005 Jan 14; 5. Available from: http:yywww.ijic.orgy.
3. Booz Allen Hamilton. Beyond e-government: the world's most successful technology-enabled transformations. INSEAD; 2005. Available from: http:yywww.boozallen.comycapabilitiesyIndustriesyindustries_articley884216.
4. Cross M, MacGregor J. Cutting the wires: mobile IT and the transformation of local services and governance. London: National Local Government Network; 2006.
5. Ling T. Delivering joined-up government in the UK: dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration 2002;80(4):615-42.
6. Laming H. The Victoria Climbié inquiry: report of an inquiry. 2003. Available from: http:yywww.victoria-climbieinquiry. org.ukyfinreportydownloadreport.htm.
7. Department of Health. Our health, our care, our say: making it happen. London: NHS; 2006 Oct. Available from: http: yywww.dh.gov.ukyenyPublicationsandstatisticsyPublicationsyPublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceyDH_4139925.
8. Kings Fund. Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services. Kings Fund Briefing. Kings Fund; 2006. Available from: http:yywww.kingsfund.org.ukypublicationsybriefingsyour_health_our.html.
9. Green A, Maguire M, Canny A. Keeping track: mapping and tracking vulnerable young people. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2001.
10. Payne S, Kerr C, Hawker S, Hardey M, Powell J. The communication of information about older people between health and social care practitioners. Age & Ageing 2002 Mar;31(2):107-17.
11. Bellamy C. From automation to knowledge management: modernizing British government with ICTs. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2002;68(2):213-30.
12. Geoghegan L, Lever J, McGimpsey I. ICT for social welfare: a toolkit for managers. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2004.
13. Philip I. A recipe for care-not a single ingredient. Clinical case for change: report. London: Department of Health; 2007.
14. Glendinning C, Hudson B, Means R. Under strain? Exploring the troubled relationship between health and social care. Public Money Management 2005;25(4):245-51.
15. Scourfield P.'What matters is what works'? How discourses of modernization have both silenced and limited debate on domiciliary care for older people. Critical Social Policy 2006 Feb;26(1):5-30.
16. Hudson B. Policy change and policy dilemmas: interpreting the community services White Paper in England. International Journal of Integrated Care wserial onlinex 2006 Aug 17; 6. Available from: http:yywww.ijic.orgy.
17. Cochrane A. Modernisation, managerialism and the culture wars: reshaping the local welfare state in England. Local Government Studies 2004;30(4):481-96.
18. Kodner D. Consumer-directed services: lessons and implications for integrated systems of care. International Journal of Integrated Care wserial onlinex; 2003 Jun; 3. Available from: http:yywww.ijic.orgy.
19. Bogdanor V, editor. Joined-up government. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
20. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, A plan for reform. London: HMSO; 2000. Report Cm 4818-I. Available from: http:yywww.dh.gov.ukyenyPublicationsandstatisticsyPublicationsyPublicationsPolicyAndGuidancey DH_4002960.
21. National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health; 2001. Available from: http:yywww.dh.gov.uky enyPublicationsandstatisticsyPublicationsyPublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceyDH_4003066.
22. Stuck AF, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. The Lancet 1993;342(8878):1032-6.
23. Change Agent Team, Department of Health. Changing Times: improving services for older people. Report on the work of the Health and Social Care Change Agent Team 2003y04. London: Department of Health; 2004. Available from: http:yywww.dh.gov.ukyenyPublicationsandstatisticsyPublicationsyPublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceyDH_4090014.
24. Centre for Policy on Ageing. Single assessment process: National SAP Resource. wwebpage on the internetx. c2006 wcited 2006; updated 2007 May 3x. Available from: http:yywww.cpa.org.ukysapysap_about.html.
25. Grimley Evans J, Tallis RC. A new beginning for care for elderly people? British Medical Journal 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):807-8.
26. van Wijngaarden J, de Bont A, Huijsman R. Learning to cross boundaries: the integration of a health network to deliver seamless care. Health Policy 2006 Dec;79(2-3):203-13.
27. Challis D, Stewart K, Donnelly M, Weiner K, Hughes J. Care management for older people: does integration make a difference? Journal of Interprofessional Care 2006;20(4):335-48.
28. Leutz W. Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. The Milbank Quarterly 1999;77(1):77-110, iv-v.
29. Anderson JG. Security of the distributed electronic patient record: a case-based approach to identifying policy issues. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2000 Nov;60(2):111-8.
30. Evers S, Paulus A, Boonen A. Integrated care across borders: possibilities and complexities. International Journal of Integrated Care wserial onlinex 2001 Sep 1; 1. Available from: http:yywww.ijic.orgy.
31. Wan TTH, Ma A, Lin BYJ. Integration and the performance of healthcare networks: do integration strategies enhance efficiency, profitability, and image? International Journal of Integrated Care wserial onlinex 2001 Jun 1; 1. Available from: http:yywww.ijic.orgy.
32. Glasby J. Social services and the single assessment process: early warning signs? Journal of Interprofessional Care 2004 May;18(2):129-39.
33. Dickinson A. Implementing the single assessment process: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2006 Aug;20(4):365-79.
34. Worth A. Assessment of the needs of older people by district nurses and social workers: a changing culture? Journal of Interprofessional Care 2001 Aug;15(3):257-66.
35. Hudson B. Interprofessionality in health and social care: the Achilles' heel of partnership? Journal of Interprofessional Care 2002 Feb;16(1):7-17.
36. Hardy B, Mur-Veeman I, Steenbergen M, Wistow G. Inter-agency services in England and the Netherlands: a comparative study of integrated care development and delivery. Health Policy 1999(48):87-105.
37. Baines S, Gannon-Leary P, Walsh S. Framework for Multi-Agency Environments (FAME): Final Report of the learning and evaluation, Newcastle Upon Tyne: The Newcastle Centre for Social and Business Informatics, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne; 2004. Available from: http:yywww.fame-uk.orgyarchiveystrandydownloadsydecemberReport.pdf.
38. Gannon-Leary P, Baines S, Wilson R. Collaboration and partnership: a review and reflections on a national project to join up local services in England. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2006 Dec;20(6):665-74.
39. FAME: Framework for Multi-Agency Environments wwebpage on the internetx. c2006 wcited 2006x Available from: http: yywww.fame-uk.org.
40. Glendinning C. Breaking down barriers: integrating health and care services for older people in England. Health Policy 2003 Aug;65(2):139-51.
41. Robinson M, Cottrel D. Health professionals in multi-disciplinary and multi-agency teams: changing professional practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2005 Dec;19(6):547-60.
42. Huxham C. Creating collaborative advantage. London: Sage;1996.
43. Banks P. Partnerships under pressure. London: Kings Fund; 2002. Available from: http:yywww.idea.gov.ukyidkytioy 235461.
44. Glendinning C. Partnerships Between Health and Social Services: developing a framework for evaluation. Policy and Politics 2002;30(1):115-27.
45. House of Commons. Select Committee on Public Accounts: Thirty-Second Report. London: Houses of Parliament; 2002. Available from: http:yywww.publications.parliament.ukypaycm200102ycmselectycmpubaccy357y35702.htm.
46. NHS connecting for health: a national framework for electronic SAP implementation wwebpage on the Internetx. National Health Service; 2006. Available from: http:yywww.cpa.org.ukysapye-sapyCFH-eSAPyIntro_Presentation_re_ eSAP_(2).ppt.
47. Department of Health wwebpage on the internetx. London: Department of Health; 2006 wcited 2006 updated 2007x Available from: www.dh.gov.uk.
48. Johri M, Beland F, Bergman H. International experiment in integrated care for the elderly: a synthesis of evidence. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2003 Mar;18(3):222-35.
49. Banks P. Policy Framework for integrated care for older people. London: Kings Fund; 2004.
50. Büscher M, Gill S, Mogensen P, Shapiro D. Landscapes of practice: bricolage as a method for situated design computer supported cooperative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2001;10(1):1-28.