You have no idea what you are talking about!" from e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora

Journal of Politeness Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 57-82

  Angouri, Jo ^a   Tseliga, Theodora ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communities of Practice; Computer Mediated Communication; Disagreement; Impoliteness

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950157324     PISSN: 16125681     EISSN: 16134877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/JPLR.2010.004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Angouri, Jo and Tseliga Dora. In preparation. Doing (dis)agreement in online discourse
2. Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca. 2003. Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1453-1469
3. Baym, Nancy K. 1996. Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (4). 315-345
4. Beebe, Leslie. M. 1995. Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence. In James E. Alatis, Carolyn A. Straehle, Brent Gallenberger and Maggie Ronkin (eds.), Linguistics and the education of language teachers: Ethnolinguistic, psycholinguistics and sociolinguistic aspects (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics), 154-168. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press
5. Bousfield, Derek. 2007. Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 2185-2216
6. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. Cherny, Lily. 1999. Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications
8. Collot, Milena and Nancy Belmore. 1996. Electronic language. In Susan C. Herring (ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, 3-28. Oxford: Oxford University Press
9. Crystal, David. 2006. Language and the internet, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1). 35-72
11. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2008. Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21), 17-44. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
12. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield and Anne Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1545-1579
13. Danet, Brenda. 2001. Cyberpl@y. Communicating online. Oxford: Berg
14. De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin and Michael Bamberg (eds.). 2006. Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
15. Eysenbach, Gunther and James E. Till. 2001. Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ 323. 1103-1105
16. Foster, Derek. 1997. Community and identity in the electronic village. In David Porter (ed.), Internet culture, 23-37. London: Routledge
17. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2001. Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1881-1900
18. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. Forthcoming. "On fordrinkies?": E-mail cues of participant alignments. In Susan C. Herring (ed.), Computer-mediated conversation (Communication Series). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
19. Graham, Sage Lambert. 2007. Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 742-759
20. Graham, Sage L. 2008. A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice. In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21), 281-304. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
21. Herring, Susan C. 1996. Linguistic and critical analysis of computer-mediated communication: Some ethical and scholarly considerations. The Information Society 12 (2). 153-168
22. Herring, Susan C. 2001. Computer-mediated discourse. In Deborah Tannen, Deborah Schiffrin and Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis, 612-634. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
23. Herring, Susan. C. 2002. Computer-mediated communication on the internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36. 109-168
24. Herring, Susan C. 2007. A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet. http://www.languageatinternet. de/articles/2007/761 (accessed 27 May 2009)
25. Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, men and politeness. London: Longman
26. Holmes, Janet and Meredith Marra. 2004. Relational practice in the workplace: Women's talk or gendered discourse? Language in Society 33 (3). 377-398
27. Holmes, Janet. 2006. Politeness strategies as linguistic variables. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 684-697, 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier
28. Holton, David, Peter Mackridge and Irene Philippaki-Warburton. 1997. Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge
29. Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
30. Kakava, Christina. 1993. Negotiation of disagreement by Greeks in conversations and classroom discourse. Washington, DC: Georgetown University unpublished PhD dissertation
31. Kakava, Christina. 2002. Opposition in Modern Greek discourse: Cultural and contextual constraints. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 1537-1568
32. Kotthoff, Helga. 1993. Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22. 193-216
33. Kress, Gunther. 2000. Early spelling: Between convention and creativity. London: Routledge
34. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
35. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
36. Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication (Language, Power and Social Process 12). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
37. Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1). 9-33
38. Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts. 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21), 77-99. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
39. Maynor, Natalie. 1994. The Language of electronic mail: Written speech? In Greta D. Little and Michael Montgomery (eds.), Centennial usage studies (American Dialect Society 78), 48-54. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press
40. McElhearn, Kirk. 1996. Writing conversation: An analysis of speech events in e-mailing lists. http://www.mcelhearn.com/cmc.html (accessed 27 May 2009)
41. Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
42. Mullany, Louise. 2008. Impoliteness, power and gender identity in the professional discourse. In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
43. Norrick, R. Neal and Alice Spitz. 2008. Humour as a resource for mitigating conflict. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 1661-1686
44. Pomerantz, Anita M. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In John M. Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
45. Schiffrin, Deborah. 1984. Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13. 311-335
46. Schnurr, Stephanie, Meredith Marra and Janet Holmes. 2008. Impoliteness as a means of contesting and challenging power relations in the workplace. In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
47. Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 529-545
48. Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: unpack-aging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1). 95-119
49. Tannen, Deborah. 1981. New York Jewish conversational style. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 30. 133-149
50. Tannen, Deborah. 2002. Agonism in academic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 1651-1669
51. Tannen, Deborah and Christina Kakava. 1992. Power and solidarity in Modern Greek conversation: Disagreeing to agree. Journal of Modern Greek Studies 10 (1). 11-34
52. Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
53. Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
54. Yates, Simon. 1997. Gender, identity and CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13. 281-290