Antenatal day care units versus hospital admission for women with complicated pregnancy

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Dowswell, Therese ^a   Middleton, Philippa ^b   Weeks, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

*Day care economics ; *Hospital units; *Hospitalization economics ; *Therapy ; Cost benefit analysis; Female; Humans; Length of stay; Pregnancy; Pregnancy complications economics; Randomized controlled trials as topic

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LENGTH OF STAY; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MATERNAL MORTALITY; META ANALYSIS; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT CARE; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; PREMATURE LABOR; PRENATAL CARE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WARD;

EID: 77950143061     PISSN: 1469493X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001803.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Hooker 1986 {published and unpublished data} Hooker JG, Henson GL. Hypertension in pregnancy: a trial comparing admission to hospital with management in a day unit. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1986;7:152.
2. Tuffnell 1992 {published and unpublished data} Tuffnell DJ, Lilford RJ, Buchan PC, Prendiville VM, Tuffnell AJ, Holgate MP, et al.Randomised controlled trial of day care for hypertension in pregnancy. Lancet 1992;339:224-7.
3. Turnbull 2004 {published data only} Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. ANCA Trial - randomised controlled trial of antenatal day assessment for management of hypertension. Perinatal Trials Report (http://www.ctc.usyd.edu.au/ 6registry/ impactreport.htm) (accessed 2002).
4. * Turnbull DA, Wilkinson C, Gerard K, Shanahan M, Ryan P, Griffith EC, et al.Clinical, psychosocial, and economic effects of antenatal day care for three medical complications of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial of 395 women. Lancet 2004;363: 1104-9.
5. Turnbull DA, Wilkinson C, Griffith EC, Kruzins G, Gerard K, Shanahan M, et al.The psychosocial outcomes of antenatal day care for three medical complications of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial of 395 women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006;46(6):510-6.
6. Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Stamp G, Gerard K, Ryan P, Sweet R, et al.Randomised controlled trial of clinical efficacy of antenatal day care [abstract]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003;43:182.
7. Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Stamp G, Gerard K, Ryan P, Sweet R, et al.Randomised controlled trial of psychosocial efficacy of antenatal day care [abstract]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003;43: 185.
8. Leung 1998 {published data only} Leung KY, Sum TK, Tse CY, Law KW, Chan MY. Is in-patient management of diastolic blood pressure between 90 and 100 mm Hg during pregnancy necessary?. Hong Kong Medical Journal 1998; 4:211-7.
9. Adelson 1999 Adelson PL, Child AG, Giles WB, Henderson-Smart DJ. Antenatal hospitalisations in New South Wales, 1995-96. Medical Journal of Australia 1999;170:211-5.
10. Bacak 2005 Bacak SJ, Callaghan WM, Dietz PM, Crouse C. Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States, 1999-2000. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;192(2):592-7.
11. Bennett 1998 Bennett TA, Kotelchuck M, Cox CE, Tucker MJ, Nadeau DA. Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States in 1991 and 1992: a comprehensive view of maternal morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998;178(2):346-54.
12. Deeks 2001 Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG editor (s). Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books, 2001.
13. Duley 2006 Duley L, Meher S, Abalos E. Management of pre-eclampsia. BMJ 2006;332(7539):463-8.
14. Dunlop 2003 Dunlop L, Umstad M, McGrath G, Reidy K, Brennecke S. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction with pregnancy day care for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003;43(3):207-12.
15. Franks 1992 Franks AL, Kendrick JS, Olson DR, Atrash HK, Saftlas AF, Moien M. Hospitalization for pregnancy complications, United States, 1986 and 1987. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;166(5):1339-44.
16. Gates 2005 Gates S. Methodological guidelines. In: the Editorial Team. Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Collaborative Review Groups (CRGs)) 2005, Issue 2.
17. Higgins 2008 Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook. org.
18. Lewis 1993 Lewis L. In a day's work. Nursing Times 1993;89(5):31-3.
19. Liu 2007 Liu S, Heaman M, Sauve R, Liston R, Reyes F, Bartholomew S, et al.An analysis of antenatal hospitalization in Canada, 1991-2003. Maternal & Child Health Journal 2007;11(2):181-7.
20. RevMan 2008 The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.0. Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
21. Rosenberg 1990 Rosenberg K, Twaddle S. Screening and surveillance of pregnancy hypertension - an economic approach to the use of daycare. Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1990;4(1):89-107.
22. Scott 1997 Scott CL, Chavez GF, Atrash HK, Taylor DJ, Shah RS, Rowley D. Hospitalizations for severe complications of pregnancy, 1987-1992. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1997;90(2):225-9.
23. Twaddle 1992 Twaddle S, Harper V. An economic evaluation of daycare in the management of hypertension in pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1992;99:459-63.
24. Twaddle 1995 Twaddle S. Day care for women with high risk pregnancies. Nursing Times 1995;91(4):46-7.
25. Walker 1993 Walker JJ. Day care obstetrics. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 1993;50(5):225-6.
26. Zwart 2008 Zwart J, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J, et al.Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of 371,000 pregnancies. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2008;115(7): 842-50.
27. References to other published versions of this review
28. Kroner 2001 Kröner CC, Turnbull DA, Wilkinson CS. Antenatal day care units versus hospital admission for women with complicated pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001803]