Statistical distributions of earthquake numbers: Consequence of branching process

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 180, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1313-1328

  Kagan, Yan Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Earthquake interaction, forecasting, and prediction; North America; Probabilistic forecasting; Probability distributions; Statistical seismology; Theoretical seismology

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION; FREQUENCY-MAGNITUDE DISTRIBUTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; POISSON RATIO; POWER LAW DISTRIBUTION; PROBABILITY; SEISMOLOGY; TECTONIC SETTING; THRESHOLD; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 77950140914     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04487.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Anraku K, Yanagimoto T. Estimation for the negative binomial distribution based on the conditional likelihood. Commun. Stat.-Simulat. Comput. 1990, 19(3):771-786.
2. Anscombe FJ. Sampling theory of the negative binomial and logarithmic series distributions. Biometrika 1950, 37(3/4):358-382.
3. Bartlett MS. An Introduction to Stochastic Processes with Special Reference to Methods and Applications 1978, 388. 3rd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp
4. Bird P, Kagan YY. Plate-tectonic analysis of shallow seismicity: apparent boundary width, beta, corner magnitude, coupled lithosphere thickness, and coupling in seven tectonic settings. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2004, 94(6):2380-2399. and electronic supplement
5. Bremaud P, Massoulie L. Hawkes branching point processes without ancestors. J. appl. Probab. 2001, 38(1):122-135.
6. Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 2009, 51:661-703.
7. Consul PC. Generalized Poisson Distributions: Properties and Applications 1989, 302. New York, Dekker, pp
8. Cornell CA. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1968, 58:1583-1606.
9. Dionysiou DD, Papadopoulos GA. Poissonian and negative binomial modelling of earthquake time series in the Aegean area. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 1992, 71(3-4):154-165.
10. Ebel JE, Bonjer K-P, Oncescu MC. Paleoseismicity: seismicity evidence for past large earthquakes. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2000, 71(2):283-294.
11. Ekström G, Dziewonski AM, Maternovskaya NN, Nettles M. Global seismicity of 2003: centroid-moment-tensor solutions for 1087 earthquakes. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 2005, 148(2-4):327-351.
12. Enescu B, Mori J, Miyazawa M, Kano Y. Omori-Utsu law c-values associated with recent moderate earthquakes in Japan. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2009, 99(2A):884-891.
13. Evans DA. Experimental evidence concerning contagious distributions in ecology. Biometrika 1953, 40(1-2):186-211.
14. Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B. Statistical Distributions 2000, 221. 3rd edn, John Wiley, New York, pp
15. Feller W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications 1968, Vol. 1:509. 3rd edn, John Wiley, New York, pp
16. Field EH. Overview of the working group for the development of regional earthquake likelihood models (RELM). Seism. Res. Lett. 2007, 78(1):7-16.
17. Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products 1980, 1160. Academic Press, NY, pp
18. Hawkes AG. Point spectra of some mutually exciting point processes. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 1971, B33:438-443.
19. Hilbe JM. Negative Binomial Regression 2007, 251. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp
20. Hileman JA, Allen CR, Nordquist JM. Seismicity of the Southern California Region, 1 January 1932 to 31 December 1972 1973, Cal. Inst. Technology, Pasadena
21. Hutton LK, Jones LM. Local magnitudes and apparent variations in seismicity rates in Southern California. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1993, 83:313-329.
22. Hutton K, Hauksson E, Clinton J, Franck J, Guarino A, Scheckel N, Given D, Young A. Southern California Seismic Network update. Seism. Res. Lett. 2006, 77(3):389-395. 10.1785/gssrl.77.3.389, doi
23. Jackson DD, Kagan YY. Testable earthquake forecasts for 1999. Seism. Res. Lett. 1999, 70(4):393-403.
24. Johnson NL, Kemp AW, Kotz S. Univariate Discrete Distributions 2005, 646. 3rd edn, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp
25. Kagan YY. A probabilistic description of the seismic regime. Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Solid Earth 1973a, 213-219. http://eq.ess.ucla.edu/~kagan/pse_1973_index.html, (English translation). Scanned versions of the Russian and English text are available at
26. Kagan YY. Statistical methods in the study of the seismic process (with discussion: comments by M.S. Bartlett, A.G. Hawkes, & J.W. Tukey). Bull. Int. Statist. Inst. 1973b, 45(3):437-453. http://moho.ess.ucla.edu/~kagan/Kagan_1973b.pdf, Scanned version of text is available at
27. Kagan YY. Likelihood analysis of earthquake catalogues. Geophys. J. Int. 1991, 106(1):135-148.
28. Kagan YY. Comment on " The Gutenberg-Richter or characteristic earthquake distribution, which is it?" by Steven G. Wesnousky. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1996, 86(1a):274-285.
29. Kagan YY. Aftershock zone scaling. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2002, 92(2):641-655.
30. Kagan YY. Accuracy of modern global earthquake catalogs. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 2003, 135(2-3):173-209.
31. Kagan YY. Short-term properties of earthquake catalogs and models of earthquake source. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2004, 94(4):1207-1228.
32. Kagan YY. Why does theoretical physics fail to explain and predict earthquake occurrence?. Modelling Critical and Catastrophic Phenomena in Geoscience: A Statistical Physics Approach, Lecture Notes in Physics 2006, Vol. 705:303-359. Bhattacharyya PChakrabarti BK. in, pp, eds, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg
33. Kagan YY, Jackson DD. Long-term earthquake clustering. Geophys. J. Int. 1991, 104(1):117-133.
34. Kagan YY, Jackson DD. Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int. 2000, 143(2):438-453.
35. Kagan YY, Knopoff L. Statistical short-term earthquake prediction. Science 1987, 236(4808):1563-1567.
36. Kagan YY, Bird P, Jackson DD. Earthquake Patterns in Diverse Tectonic Zones of the Globe. Pure appl. Geophys. 2010, 167(6/7). http://scec.ess.ucla.edu/~ykagan/globe_index.html
37. Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Read C, Vidakovic B. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 2006, 16 Vols. 2nd edn, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ
38. Lombardi AM, Marzocchi W. Evidence of clustering and nonstationarity in the time distribution of large worldwide earthquakes. J. geophys. Res. 2007, 112:B02303. 10.1029/2006JB004568, doi
39. Ogata Y. Statistical models for earthquake occurrence and residual analysis for point processes. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 1988, 83:9-27.
40. Ogata Y. Space-time point-process models for earthquake occurrences. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 1998, 50(2):379-402.
41. Patil GP. Some methods of estimation for logarithmic series distribution. Biometrics 1962, 18(1):68-75.
42. Patil GP, Wani JK. Maximum likelihood estimation for the complete and truncated logarithmic series distributions. Sankhya 1965, 27A(2/4):281-292.
43. U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Dep. of Inter., Natl. Earthquake Inf. Cent. 2008, http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/epic/epic.html, http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/epic/code_catalog.html, Preliminary determinations of epicenters (PDE), and
44. Saichev A, Helmstetter A, Sornette D. Anomalous scaling of offspring and generation numbers in branching processes. Pure appl. Geophys. 2005, 162:1113-1134.
45. Saichev A, Sornette D. Power law distribution of seismic rates. Tectonophysics 2007, 431:7-13. 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.026, doi
46. Schorlemmer D, Gerstenberger MC. RELM testing Center. Seism. Res. Lett. 2007, 78(1):30-35.
47. Schorlemmer D, Gerstenberger MC, Wiemer S, Jackson DD, Rhoades DA. Earthquake likelihood model testing. Seism. Res. Lett. 2007, 78(1):17-29.
48. Schorlemmer D, Zechar JD, Werner M, Jackson DD, Field EH, Jordan TH. First results of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models Experiment. Pure appl. Geophys. 2010, 167(8/9).
49. Shenton LR, Myers R. Comments on estimation for the negative binomial distribution. Classical and Contagious Discrete Distributions 1963, 241-262. in, pp, ed., G. P. Patil, Stat. Publ. Soc., Calcutta
50. Shlien S, Toksöz MN. A clustering model for earthquake occurrences. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1970, 60(6):1765-1788.
51. Sornette D, Werner MJ. Apparent clustering and apparent background earthquakes biased by undetected seismicity. J. geophys. Res. 2005, 110(9):B09303. 10.1029/2005JB003621, doi
52. Tripathi RC. Negative binomial distribution. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 2006, Vol. 8:5413-20. Kotz SBalakrishnan NRead CVidakovic B. in, pp, eds, 2nd edn, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ
53. Vere-Jones D. Stochastic models for earthquake occurrence (with discussion). J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 1970, B32(1):1-62.
54. Wilks SS. Mathematical Statistics 1962, 644. John Wiley, New York, pp
55. Zaliapin IV, Kagan YY, Schoenberg F. Approximating the distribution of Pareto sums. Pure appl. Geophys. 2005, 162(6-7):1187-1228.
56. Zhuang JC, Ogata Y, Vere-Jones D. Analyzing earthquake clustering features by using stochastic reconstruction. J. geophys. Res. 2004, 109(B5):B05301. 10.1029/2003JB002879, doi