Zero-lag synchronization and multiple time delays in two coupled chaotic systems

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Zigzag, Meital ^a   Butkovski, Maria ^a   Englert, Anja ^b   Kinzel, Wolfgang ^b   Kanter, Ido ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BERNOULLI; COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; COUPLED CHAOTIC SYSTEM; LAG SYNCHRONIZATION; LANG-KOBAYASHI; MULTIPLE TIME DELAY; MUTUAL COUPLING; SELF-FEEDBACK;

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; DIPOLE ANTENNAS; FEEDBACK;

CHAOTIC SYSTEMS;

EID: 77950137252     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.036215     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. H. G. Schuster and W. Just, Deterministic Chaos (Wiley VCH, Weinheim, 2005). 10.1002/3527604804
2. S. Boccaletti, J. Kurths, G. Osipov, D. L. Valladares, and C. S. Zhou, Phys. Rep. 366, 1 (2002). 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00137-0
3. A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001).
4. T. L. Carroll and L. M. Pecora, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 38, 453 (1991). 10.1109/31.75404
5. L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. A 44, 2374 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.2374
6. L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.821
7. E. Klein, N. Gross, E. Kopelowitz, M. Rosenbluh, L. Khaykovich, W. Kinzel, and I. Kanter, Phys. Rev. E 74, 046201 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74. 046201
8. R. Vicente, T. Perez, and C. R. Mirasso, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 38, 1197 (2002). 10.1109/JQE.2002.802110
9. Y. Aviad, I. Reidler, W. Kinzel, I. Kanter, and M. Rosenbluh, Phys. Rev. E 78, 025204 (R) (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.025204
10. I. Fischer, R. Vicente, J. M. Buldu, M. Peil, C. R. Mirasso, M. C. Torrent, and J. Garcia-Ojalvo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 123902 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.123902
11. V. Ahlers, U. Parlitz, and W. Lauterborn, Phys. Rev. E 58, 7208 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.7208
12. I. Kanter, N. Gross, E. Klein, E. Kopelowitz, P. Yoskovits, L. Khaykovich, W. Kinzel, and M. Rosenbluh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 154101 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.154101
13. I. Fischer, Y. Liu, and P. Davis, Phys. Rev. A 62, 011801 (R) (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.011801
14. S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006). 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009
15. I. Kanter, E. Kopelowitz, and W. Kinzel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 084102 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.084102
16. G. D. VanWiggeren and R. Roy, Science 279, 1198 (1998). 10.1126/science.279.5354.1198
17. A. Argyris, Nature (London) 438, 343 (2005). 10.1038/nature04275
18. F. M. Atay, J. Jost, and A. Wende, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 144101 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.144101
19. E. Rodriguez, N. George, J. P. Lachaux, J. Martinerie, B. Renault, and F. J. Varela, Nature (London) 397, 430 (1999). 10.1038/17120
20. G. Schneider and D. Nikolic, J. Neurosci. Methods 152, 97 (2006). 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.014
21. J. Kestler, E. Kopelowitz, I. Kanter, and W. Kinzel, Phys. Rev. E 77, 046209 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.046209
22. M. J. Bünner and W. Just, Phys. Rev. E 58, R4072 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.R4072
23. M. G. Earl and Steven H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. E 67, 036204 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.036204
24. C. Masoller and A. C. Martí, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 134102 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.134102
25. M. Dhamala, V. K. Jirsa, and M. Ding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 074104 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.074104
26. I. B. Schwartz and L. B. Shaw, Phys. Rev. E 75, 046207 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.046207
27. M. Chen and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 76, 036212 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.036212
28. - 8 over a distance of 100 km, and might also be sensitive to the time-dependent features of the environment.
29. S. Lepri, G. Giacomelli, A. Politi, and F. T. Arecchi, Physica D 70, 235 (1994). 10.1016/0167-2789(94)90016-7
30. R. Lang and K. Kobayashi, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-16, 347 (1980). 10.1109/JQE.1980.1070479
31. M. Zigzag, M. Butkovski, A. Englert, W. Kinzel, and I. Kanter, Euro phys. Lett. 85, 60005 (2009). 10.1209/0295-5075/85/60005
32. W. Kinzel, A. Englert, G. Reents, M. Zigzag, and I. Kanter, Phys. Rev. E 79, 056207 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.056207
33. +.
34. Note that the weight of the mutual coupling is ε (1 - κ) = 0.196 but the effective weight of one self-feedback is ε κ α i = 0.392. Hence, the ZLS is not expected to be equal to either panels of figure 3.
35. The semianalytical solution indicates that plateaus of ZLS are slightly wider and no few sudden drops among the plateaus. These tiny mismatches are due to almost zero maximal Lyapunov exponent close to the plateaus boundaries, and limited number of steps in simulations.
36. - 14, see also. We avoid this affect by calculating the average cross correlation [Eq.] of the maximal 10 among last 20 windows of size 100 ns each.
37. Our results are in disagreement with the reported results of E. M. Shahverdiev and K. A. Shore, Phys. Rev. E 77, 057201 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.057201
38. M. Peil, L. Larger, and I. Fischer, Phys. Rev. E 76, 045201 (R) (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.045201
39. R. Vicente, C. R. Mirasso, and I. Fischer, Opt. Lett. 32, 403 (2007). 10.1364/OL.32.000403
40. N. Gross, W. Kinzel, I. Kanter, M. Rosenbluh, and L. Khaykovich, Opt. Commun. 267, 464 (2006). 10.1016/j.optcom.2006.06.055