Merged municipalities, higher debt: On free-riding and the common pool problem in politics

Public Choice

Volumn 143, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 157-172

  Jordahl, Henrik ^a   Liang, Che Yuan ^a,b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS IFN   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Common pool; Difference in differences; Free riding; Local government amalgamation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949912426     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-009-9495-y     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (1997). On the number and size of nations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1027-1056.
2. Baqir, R. (2002). Districting and government overspending. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 1318-1354.
3. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249-275.
4. Bolton, P., & Roland, G. (1997). The breakup of nations: a political economy analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1058-1090.
5. Bradbury, J. C., & Crain, M. (2001). Legislative organization and government spending: cross-country evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 309-325.
6. Bradbury, J. C., & Stephenson, F. (2003). Local government structure and public expenditures. Public Choice, 115, 185-198.
7. Buchanan, J., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8. Gilligan, T., & Matsusaka, J. (1995). Deviations from constituent interests: the role of legislative structure and political parties in the states. Economic Inquiry, 33, 383-401.
9. Gilligan, T., & Matsusaka, J. (2001). Fiscal policy, legislature size, and political parties: evidence from state and local governments in the first half of the 20th century. National Tax Journal, 54, 57-82.
10. Gustafsson, A. (1978). Local government in Sweden. Stockholm: Liber.
11. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics: explaining economic policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2004). Does the size of the legislature affect the size of government? Evidence from two natural experiments (VATT Discussion Paper 350). Helsinki: Government Institute of Economic Research.
14. Primo, D., & Snyder, J. (2008). Distributive politics and the law of 1/n. Journal of Politics, 70, 477-486.
15. Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 147, 656-666.
16. Rubin, D. B. (2004). Direct and indirect causal effects via potential outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 31, 161-170.
17. Sandalow, T. (1971). Local government in Sweden. American Journal of Comparative Law, 19, 766-785.
18. SOU (1978). Ny Indelningslag för Kommuner, Landstingskommuner och Församlingar. SOU 1978: 32. Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.
19. Strömberg, L., & Westerståhl, J. (1984). The new Swedish communes. Stockholm: Lerums Boktryckeri.
20. Tullock, G. (1959). Problems of majority voting. Journal of Political Economy, 67, 571-579.
21. Tyrefors Hinnerich, B. (2009). Do merging local governments free ride on their counterparts when facing boundary reform? Journal of Public Economics, 93, 721-728.
22. Wångmar, E. (2003). Från Sockenkommun till Storkommun, En Analys av Storkommunreformens Genomförande 1939-1952 i en Nationell och Lokal Kontext. Acta Wexionensia 25, Doctoral Dissertation, Växjö: Växjö University Press.
23. Weingast, B., Shepsle, K., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: a neoclassical approach to politics. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 642-664.