Perspectives on cumulative risks and impacts

International Journal of Toxicology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 58-64

  Faust, John B ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cumulative impact; Cumulative risk; Environmental justice; Environmental policy; Environmental regulation; Socioeconomic factors

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CUMULATIVE RISK; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; POLLUTION; RISK; RISK MANAGEMENT; SOCIOECONOMICS; ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; POLLUTANT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TIME; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; HUMANS; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STATE GOVERNMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77949884129     PISSN: 10915818     EISSN: 1092874X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1091581809347387     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. National Research Council. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1983.
2. Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987. California Health and Safety Code §§ 44300-44394.
3. Salmon, AG. 2009. Do standard risk assessment procedures adequately account for cumulative risks? An exploration of the possibilities using California's Air Toxics Hot Spots guidelines. Int J Toxicol. [In press].
4. Howd, RA. 2009. Considering changes in exposure and sensitivity in an early life cumulative risk assessment [published online ahead of print August 26, 2009]. Int J Toxicol. doi:10.1177/1091581809344436.
5. US Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for the Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures: Risk Assessment Forum. EPA/630/R-98/002. Washington, DC: US EPA; September 1986.
6. US Environmental Protection Agency. Supplementary Guidance for Conducting Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures: Risk Assessment Forum. EPA/630/R-00/002. Washington, DC: US EPA; August 2000.
7. Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. Public Law 104-170.
8. US Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance on Cumulative Risk Assessment, Part 1: Planning and Scoping. Washington, DC: US EPA Science Policy Council; July 3, 1997.
9. US Environmental Protection Agency. Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment: Risk Assessment Forum. EPA/630/P-02/001F. Washington, DC: US EPA; May 2003.
10. National Environmental Justice Advisory Council Cumulative Risks/Impacts Work Group. Ensuring Risk Reduction in Communities With Multiple Stressors: Environmental Justice and Cumulative Risks/Impacts. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. December 2004.
11. Cal/EPA Advisory Committee on Environmental Justice. Recommendations of the Cal/EPA Advisory Committee on Environmental Justice to the Cal/EPA Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice: Final Report. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency; September 30, 2003.
12. California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Environmental justice pilot project. 2007. http://cdpr.ca.gov/docs/envjust/pilot-proj/index.htm. Accessed September 8, 2009.
13. California Air Resources Board. Children's environmental risk reduction plan-Wilmington. 2007. http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/cherrp.htm. Accessed September 8, 2009.
14. California Department of Toxic Substances Control. DTSC (forum) pilot project. 2007. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/GetInvolved/env-justice-policies.cfm. Accessed September 8, 2009.
15. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. Klamath River total maximum daily loads. 2007. http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/water- issues/programs/tmdls/klamath-river/. Accessed September 8, 2009.
16. Gruenberg, P. New river pollution in Mexico: a historical overview. State Water Resources Control Board. December 1998. http:// www.waterboards.ca.gov/ coloradoriver/water-issues/programs/new-river/newriverbook.shtml. Accessed September 8, 2009.
17. Chelsea Creek Action Group and the US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Chelsea Creek community-based comparative risk assessment. http://www.epa.gov/boston/eco/uep/boston/bprogress.html. Accessed September 8, 2009.
18. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security. Neighborhood Knowledge for Change: The West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project. Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute; January 2002.
19. US Environmental Protection Agency. Air Screening Assessment for Cook County, Illinois, and Lake County, Indiana. Prepared for the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics and Region V by the Environmental Assessment Division and Decision and Informational Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory. Chicago, IL: US Environmental Protection Agency Region V; March 2004.
20. US Environmental Protection Agency. Community action for a renewed environment (CARE). 2007. http://www.epa.gov/care/. Accessed September 8, 2009.
21. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Air Toxics 'Hot Spots' Guidelines. 2007. http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/hot-spots/index.html. Accessed September 8, 2009.
22. US Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Risk Information System. http://www.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.html. Accessed September 8, 2009.
23. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Title 42 United States Code §§ 4321-4370d.
24. California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. California Public Resources Code, §§ 21000-21177.