The reproducibility and responsiveness of a patient-specific approach: A new instrument in evaluation of treatment of temporomandibular disorders

Journal of Oral and Facial Pain and Headache

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 101-105

  Rollman, Annemiek ^a,b   Naeije, Machiel ^a,b   Visscher, Corine M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Patient specific approach; Reproducibility; Responsiveness; TMD; Treatment effect

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDER;

HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS;

EID: 77949880701     PISSN: 23330384     EISSN: 23330376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Feine JS, Widmer CG, Lund JP. Physical therapy: A critique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:123-127
2. Ferrari R, Russell AS. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: Neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003; 17:57-70
3. Ostelo RW, van Tulder MW, Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ, Morley SJ, Assendelft WJ. Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD002014
4. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005; 19:593-607
5. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ, van der Heijden GJ, Knipschild PG. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires. Spine 1995;20:1017-1028
6. Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991;14:409-415
7. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301-355
8. Stegenga B, de Bont LG, de Leeuw R, Boering G. Assessment of mandibular function impairment associated with temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:183-195
9. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996;65:71-76
10. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ, et al. A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:144-148
11. Shrout PE, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428
12. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 1986;39:897-906
13. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988;240:1285-1293
14. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149-158
15. Giraudeau B, Rozenberg S, Valat JP. Assessment of the clinically relevant change in pain for patients with sciatica. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:1180-1181
16. Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998;17:857-872
17. Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, et al. The patient-specific functional scale: Measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther 1997;77:820-829
18. Crossley KM, Bennell KL, Cowan SM, Green S. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: Which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:815-822
19. Green C, Brazier J, Deverill M. Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques. Pharmacoeconomics 2000;17:151-165
20. Lee JS, Hobden E, Stiell IG, Wells GA. Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:1128-1130
21. ten Klooster PM, Drossaers-Bakker KW, Taal E, van de Laar MA. Patient-perceived satisfactory improvement (PPSI): Interpreting meaningful change in pain from the patient's perspective. Pain 2006;121:151-157