Exploring classification strategies with the CoEPrA 2006 contest

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 603-609

  Demir Kavuk, Ozgur ^a   Riedesel, Henning ^a   Knapp, Ernst Walter ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PEPTIDE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG DESIGN; FACTUAL DATABASE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN; LIGANDS; PEPTIDES; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 77949879189     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq021     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Al-Ani, A. (2005) Ant colony optimization for feature subset selection.World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., 4, 35-38.
2. Altschul, S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
3. Baldi, P. et al. (2000) Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview. Bioinformatics, 16, 412-424.
4. Bau, D. and Trefethen, L.N. (1997) Numerical Linear Algebra. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
5. Boser, B.E. et al. (1992)Atraining algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory. ACM Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, pp. 144-152.
6. Breiman, L. (2001) Random forests. Mach. Learn., 45, 5-32.
7. Breiman, L. et al. (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
8. Budagyan, L. and Abagyan, R. (2006) Weighted quality estimates in machine learning. Bioinformatics, 22, 2597-2603.
9. Burges, C.J.C. (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Disc., 2, 121-167.
10. Doytchinova, I.A. and Flower, D.R. (2001) Toward the quantitative prediction of T-cell epitopes: coMFA and coMSIA studies of peptides with affinity for the class I MHC molecule HLA-A*0201. J. Med. Chem., 44, 3572-3581.
11. Doytchinova, I.A. and Flower, D.R. (2002) Physicochemical explanation of peptide binding to HLA-A*0201 major histocompatibility complex: a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study. Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet., 48, 505-518.
12. Doytchinova, I.A. et al. (2005) Towards the chemometric dissection of peptide-HLAA*0201 binding affinity: comparison of local and global QSAR models. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 19, 203-212.
13. Duda, R.O. et al. (2005) Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York.
14. Dunbrack, R.L. Jr. et al. (1997) Meeting review: the Second meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP2), Asilomar, California, December 13-16, 1996. Fold Des., 2, R27-R42.
15. Fisher, R.A. (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann. Eugenics, 7, 179-188.
16. Guo, H. and Viktor, H.L. (2004) Learning from imbalanced data sets with boosting and data generation: the DataBoost-IM approach. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 6, 30-39.
17. Guyon, I. and Elisseeff, A. (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. Arch., 3, 1157-1182.
18. Hattotuwagama, C.K. et al. (2004) New horizons in mouse immunoinformatics: reliable in silico prediction of mouse class I histocompatibility major complex peptide binding affinity. Org. Biomol. Chem., 2, 3274-3283.
19. Haykin, S. (1998) Neural Networks. A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
20. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J.G. (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 10915-10919.
21. Jackson, J.E. (1991) A User's Guide to Principal Components. John Wiley, New York.
22. Kawashima, S. and Kanehisa, M. (2000) AAindex: amino acid index database. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 374.
23. Kawashima, S. et al. (1999) AAindex: amino acid index database. Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 368-369.
24. Krogsgaard, M. and Davis, M.M. (2005) How T cells 'see' antigen. Nat. Immunol., 6, 239-245.
25. Kuhns, J.J. et al. (1999) Poor binding of a HER-2/neu epitope (GP2) to HLA-A2.1 is due to a lack of interactions with the center of the peptide. J. Biol. Chem., 274, 36422-36427.
26. Minsky, M. (1961) Steps toward artificial intelligence. Proc. IRE, 49, 8-30.
27. Oloff, S. and Muegge, I. (2007) kScore: a novel machine learning approach that is not dependent on the data structure of the training set. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 21, 87-95.
28. Pearson, K. (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos. Mag., 2, 559-572.
29. Riedesel, H. et al. (2004) Peptide binding at class I major histocompatibility complex scored with linear functions and support vector machines. Genome Inform., 15, 198-212.
30. Vafaie, H. and Jong, K.D. (1992) Genetic Algorithms as a Tool for Feature Selection in Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE Int. Conf. on Tools with AI. Society Press, Arlington, Virginia, USA, pp. 200-204.
31. Vapnik, V. (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York.
32. Wuju, L. and Momiao, X. (2002) Tclass: tumor classification system based on gene expression profile. Bioinformatics, 18, 325-326.