Efficiency evaluation of autonomic heart control by using the principal component analysis of ECG P-wave

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 161-167

  Krisciukaitis, A ^a   Simoliuniene, R ^a   Tamosiunas, M ^a   Saferis, V ^a   Vainoras, A ^b   Gargasas, L ^b  

^a KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Lithuania)

^b LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Autonomic heart control; ECG P wave; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTONOMIC NEUROPATHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INNERVATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOSTATIC INTOLERANCE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOSTATIC INTOLERANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949867015     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3414/ME9306     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hainsworth R. The control and physiological importance of heart rate. In: Malik M Camm AJ (eds). Heart Rate Variability. New York: Futura 1995. pp 3-19.
2. Stewart JM. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in adolescents with postural orthostatic tachy-cardia syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome is characterized by attenuated vagal baroreflex and potentiated sympathetic vasomotion. Pediatr Res 2000; 48 (2): 218-226.
3. Ziegler D, Dannehl D, Muhlen H, Spuler M, Gries FA. Prevalence of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction assessed by spectral analysis, vector analysis, and standard tests of heart rate variation and blood pressure responses at various stages of diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1992; 9: 806-814.
4. Jacob G, Costa F, Biaggioni I., Spectrum of auto-nomic cardiovascular neuropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003; 26 (7): 2174-2180. Erratum in: Diabetes Care 2003; 26 (9): 2708.
5. Ito M, Pride H P, Zipes D P. Defibrillating shocks delivered to the heart impair efferent sympathetic responsiveness. Circulation 1993; 88 (6): 2661-2673.
6. Rigden LB, Mitrani RD, Wellman HN, Klein LS, Miles WM, Zipes DP. Defibrillation shocks over epicardial patches produce sympathetic neural dysfunction in man. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996; 7 (5): 398-405.
7. Pauza DH, Skripka V, Pauziene N, Stropus R. Morphology, distribution, and variability of the epicar-diac neural ganglionated subplexuses in the human heart. Anat Rec 2000; 259 (4): 353-382
8. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Elec-trophysiology. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 354-381.
9. Krisciukaitis A, Bukauskas F, Adomonis V, Luko-sevicius K, Muckus K. Changes of Orthogonal Leads during Pacemaker Migration. Electrophysi-ology and Surgery of Cardiac Arhythmias. Vilnius: "Mokslas"; 1987. pp 41-46.
10. Boyett MR, Honjo H, Kodama I. The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure. Car-diovasc Res 2000; 47 (4): 658-687 (Review).
11. Kodama I, Boyett MR, Suzuki R, Honjo H, Toyama J. Regional differences in the response of the isolated sino-atrial node of the rabbit to vagal stimulation. J Physiol 1996; 495 (Pt 3): 785-801.
12. Adomonis VM, Bredikis IuIu., Bukauskas FF, Lu-koshiavichius KK, Mutskus KS. Transposition of the pacemaker in the right atrium during stimulation of the vagus nerve in the dog. Biull Eksp Biol Med 1987; 103 (4): 387-390. (In Russian.).
13. Shibata N, Inada S, Mitsui K, Honjo H, Yamamoto M, Niwa R, Boyett MR., Kodama I. Pacemaker shift in the rabbit sinoatrial node in response to vagal nerve stimulation. Exp Physiol 2001; 86 (2): 177-184.
14. Bouman LN, Gerlings ED, Biersteker PA, Bonke FI. Pacemaker shift in the sino-atrial node during vagal stimulation. Pflugers Arch 1968; 302 (3): 255-267.
15. Levy MN, Martin PJ, Tesse SL. Neural regulation of the heart beat. Annual Reviews in Physiology 1981; 43: 443-453.
16. Krisciukaitis A, Bukauskas F, Puodzius S. Investigations on hypoxic pacemaker shifts. Abs. 10th International Biophysics Congress, Vancouver, July 29 to August 3 1990, Canada. p 405.
17. Pappano AJ. Vagal stimulation of the heartbeat. Muscarinic receptor hypothesis. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 1991; 2: 262-273.
18. Jollife IT. Principal component analysis (second edition). New York: Springer; 2002. (ISBN 0-378-95442-2).
19. Krisciukaitis A, Simoliuniene R, Tamosiunas M, Saferis V, Vainoras A, Gargasas L. Estimation of Autonomic Heart Control by Means of Cluster Analysis of Quantitative Estimates of ECG P-Wave Shape. Proc Int Conf CeHR 2007, AKA Berlin, 2008. pp 179-184.
20. Vitartaite A, Vainoras A, Sedekerskiene V, Poderys J. The influence of aerobics exercise to cardiovascular functional parameters of 30-40 year old women. Medicina (Kaunas) 2004; 40 (5): 451-458.
21. Sörnmo L, Laguna P. Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications. Academic Press (June 15, 2005). ISBN: 0124375529.
22. Besse P, Ferre L. Sur l'usage de la validation croisée en analyse en composantes principales. Rev Stat Appl 1993; 41: 71-76.
23. Wold S. Cross-validatory estimation of the number of components in factor and pricipal component models. Technometrics 1978; 20: 397-405.
24. Krisciukaitis A, Tamosiunas M, Jakuska P, Veteikis R, Lekas R, Saferis V, Benetis R. Evaluation of ischemic injury of the cardiac tissue by using the principal component analysis of an epicardial electrogram. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006; 82 (2): 121-129.
25. Saferis V, Vilkauskas LA. Cluster Analysis by Testing the Statistical Hypothesis of Uniformity. Statistics in Medicine 1996; 15: 817-821.
26. Kuo TB, Lin T, Yang CC, Li CL, Chen CF, Chou P. Effect of aging on gender differences in neural control of heart rate. Am J Physiol 1999; 277 (6 Pt 2): H2233-9.
27. Olshansky B. Interrelationships between the auto-nomic nervous system and atrial fibrillation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2005; 48 (1): 57-78 (Review)