Microcomputed tomography assessment of glenoid component cementation techniques in total shoulder arthroplasty

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 559-564

  Hasan, Syed Ashfaq ^a   Cox, Wesley K ^a   Syed, Muhammad ^a   Suva, Larry J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Cement technique; Glenoid microarchitecture; Loosening; Shoulder arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MODIFIED WEEPHOLE TECHNIQUE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAPULA; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SYRINGE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY; CADAVER; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; SHOULDER JOINT; SYRINGES; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 77949854900     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21023     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Neer CS 2nd, Watson KC, Stanton FJ. 1982. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:319-337.
2. Norris TR, Iannotti JP. 2002. Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:130-135.
3. Iannotti JP, Norris TR. 2003. Influence of preoperative factors on outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:251-258.
4. Godeneche A, Boileau P, Favard L, et al. 2002. Prosthetic replacement in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the shoulder: early results of 268 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:11-18.
5. Goldberg BA, Smith K, Jackins S, et al. 2001. The magnitude and durability of functional improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:464-469.
6. Norris BL, Lachiewicz PF. 1996. Modern cement technique and the survivorship of total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 328:76-85.
7. Torchia ME, Cofield RH, Settergren CR. 1997. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6:495-505.
8. Brenner BC, Ferlic DC, Clayton ML, et al. 1989. Survivorship of unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1289-1296.
9. Barrett WP, Franklin JL, Jackins SE, et al. 1987. Total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:865-872.
10. Bell SN, Gschwend N. 1986. Clinical experience with total arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder using the Neer prosthesis. Int Orthop 10:217-222.
11. Boyd AD Jr, Thomas WH, Scott RD, et al. 1990. Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Indications for glenoid resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 5:329-336.
12. Cofield RH. 1984. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:899-906.
13. Fenlin JM Jr, Ramsey ML, Allardyce TJ, et al. 1994. Modular total shoulder replacement. Design rationale, indications, and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 307:37-46.
14. Franklin JL, Barrett WP, Jackins SE, et al. 1988. Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency. J Arthroplasty 3:39-46.
15. Wallace AL, Phillips RL, MacDougal GA, et al. 1999. Resurfacing of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty. A comparison, at a mean of five years, of prostheses inserted with and without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:510-518.
16. Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. 1996. Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:603-616.
17. Pfahler M, Jena F, Neyton L, et al. 2006. Hemiarthroplasty versus total shoulder prosthesis: results of cemented glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:154-163.
18. Szabo I, Buscayret F, Edwards TB, et al. 2005. Radiographic comparison of flat-back and convex-back glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:636-642.
19. Klepps S, Chiang AS, Miller S, et al. 2005. Incidence of early radiolucent glenoid lines in patients having total shoulder replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:118-125.
20. Lazarus MD, Jensen KL, Southworth C, et al. 2002. The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1174-1182.
21. Barrett WP, Thornhill TS, Thomas WH, et al. 1989. Nonconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with polyarticular rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty 4:91-96.
22. Brems J. 1993. The glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2:47-54.
23. Gartsman GM, Russell JA, Gaenslen E. 1997. Modular shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6:333-339.
24. Hawkins RJ, Bell RH, Jallay B. 1989. Total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 242:188-194.
25. Kelly IG, Foster RS, Fisher WD. 1987. Neer total shoulder replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:723-726.
26. Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. 1994. Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 307:47-69.
27. Gross R, McCarthy J, Lomneth C. 2004. The "weep-hole" technique for improved glenoid fixation. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 5:37-43.
28. Ulrich D, Hildebrand T, Van Rietbergen B, et al. 1997. The quality of trabecular bone evaluated with micro-computed tomography, FEA and mechanical testing. Stud Health Technol Inform 40:97-112.
29. Ulrich D, van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, et al. 1998. Finite element analysis of trabecular bone structure: a comparison of image-based meshing techniques. J Biomech 31:1187-1192.
30. Ulrich D, van Rietbergen B, Laib A, et al. 1999. The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. Bone 25:55-60.
31. Perrien DS, Akel NS, Edwards PK, et al. 2007. Inhibin A is an endocrine stimulator of bone mass and strength. Endocrinology 148:1654-1665.
32. Bishop JY, Flatow EL. 2005. Humeral head replacement versus total shoulder arthroplasty: clinical outcomes - a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:141S-146S.
33. Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M, et al. 2005. A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1947-1956.
34. Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM. 2000. Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:26-34.
35. Hasan SS, Leith JM, Campbell B, et al. 2002. Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:431-441.
36. Ibarra C, Dines DM, McLaughlin JA. 1998. Glenoid replacement in total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 29:403-413.
37. Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. 2006. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2279-2292.
38. Szabo I, Buscayret F, Edwards TB, et al. 2005. Radiographic comparison of two glenoid preparation techniques in total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 431:104-110.
39. Gartsman GM, Elkousy HA, Warnock KM, et al. 2005. Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:252-257.
40. Nyffeler RW, Meyer D, Sheikh R, et al. 2006. The effect of cementing technique on structural fixation of pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:106-111.
41. Nyffeler RW, Anglin C, Sheikh R, et al. 2003. Influence of peg design and cement mantle thickness on pull-out strength of glenoid component pegs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:748-752.