Mapping mixed methods research: Methods, measures, and meaning

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 87-102

  Wheeldon, J ^a  

^a Heritage University   (United States)

Author keywords

Abduction; Concept maps; Data collection; Mind maps; Mixed methods measure; Pragmatism

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949807043     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689809358755     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Ahlberg, M. (2008, September). Concept mapping as an innovation: Documents, memories and notes from Finland, Sweden, Estonia and Russia 1984-2008. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Third International Conference on Concept Mapping, Tallin, Estonia.
2. Ahlberg, M., & Ahoranta, V. (2004, September). Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain.
3. Aldridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J., & Huang, T. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 48-62.
4. Ausubel, D. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
5. Baumann, C. (1999). Adoptive fathers and birthfathers: A study of attitudes. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 16, 373-391.
6. Bayram, S. (1995). The effectiveness of concept and software mapping for representing student data and process schema in science. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Pittsburg, PA.
7. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Gerchak, J., Lyons, M., Shuman, L.J., & Wolfe, H. (2004). Scoring concept maps: An integrated rubric for assessing engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 105-116.
8. Buzan, T. (1974). Use of your head. London: BBC Books.
9. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2000). The mind map book. London: BBC Books.
10. Cash, D., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N., & Jäger, J. (2002). Credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: Linking, assessment and decision making. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government.
11. Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. New York: Harper & Brothers.
12. Cederblom, J., & Spohn, C. (1991). A model for teaching criminal justice ethics. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 2, 201-218.
13. Chenail, R.J. (1995, December). Presenting qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 2(3). Retrieved December 11, 2009, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-3/presenting.html.
14. Chodosh, H. (2005). Global justice reform: A comparative methodology. New York: New York University Press.
15. Creswell, J.W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
16. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17. Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D.F. (1996). Node-link mapping as an alternative to traditional writing assignments in undergraduate psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 23(2), 91-96.
18. Daley, B. (2004, September). Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Paper presented at the proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain.
19. Dansereau, D., Sells, S.B., & Simpson, D.D. (1979). Evaluation of treatment for youth in the Drug Abuse Reporting Program. In G. Beschner & A. S. Friedman (Eds.), Youth drug abuse: Problems, issues, and treatments (pp. 571-628). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
20. Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: SAGE.
21. Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the "mind map" study technique. Medical Education, 36(5), 26-31.
22. Gogolin, L., & Swartz, F. (1992). A quantitative and qualitative inquiry into the attitudes toward science of nonscience college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 487-504.
23. Gowin, D.B. (1981). Educating. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. Greene, J.C., Benjamin, L., & Goodyear, L. (2001). The merits of mixing methods in evaluation. Evaluation, 7(1), 25-44.
25. Greene, J.C., & Caracelli, V.J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1-18.
26. Hall, R.H., & O'Donnell, A. (1996). Cognitive and affective outcomes of learning from knowledge maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 94-101.
27. Hanf, M.B. (1971). Mapping: A technique for translating reading into thinking. Journal of Reading, 14, 225-230.
28. Heffernan, W.C., & Stroup, T. (1985). Police ethics: Hard choices in law enforcement. New York: John Jay Press.
29. Jenkins, A. (2005). Mind mapping. Nursing Standard, 20(7), 85.
30. Jenkins, J.E. (2001). Rural adolescent perceptions of alcohol and other drug resistance. Child Study Journal, 31, 211-224.
31. Jick, T.D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
32. Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
33. Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler Press.
34. Kern, C.S., Bush, K.L., & McCleish, J.M. (2006). Mind-mapped care plans: Integrating an innovative educational tool as an alternative to traditional care plans. Journal of Nursing Education, 45, 112-119.
35. Kilic, Z., Kaya, O.N., & Dogan, A. (2004). Effects of students' pre- and post-laboratory concept maps on students' attitudes toward chemistry laboratory in university general chemistry. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Chemical Education, Istanbul, Turkey.
36. Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Fort Worth, TX: Institute of General Semantics.
37. Lanzig, J.W.A. (1996). Everything you always wanted to know about. . . concept mapping. Retrieved October 16, 2006, from http://utto1031.to.utwente.nl/artikel1/.
38. Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interviews. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social research students and researchers (pp. 138-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39. McGaghie, W., McCrimmon, D., Mitchell, G., & Thompson, J. (2000). Quantitative concept mapping in pulmonary physiology: Comparison of student and faculty knowledge structures. Advanced Physiological Education, 23(1), 72.
40. Miles, M.B. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 590-600.
41. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.) Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
42. Mls, K. (2004). From concept mapping to qualitative modeling in cognitive research. Retrieved August 19, 2008, from www.cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004-159.pdf.
43. Morgan, D.L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.
44. Mueller, A., Johnston, M., & Bligh, D. (2001). Mind-mapped care plans: A remarkable alternative to traditional nursing care plans. Nurse Educator, 26(2), 75-80.
45. Myers, K., & Oetzel, J. (2003). Exploring the dimensions of organizational assimilation: Creating and validating a communication measure. Communication Quarterly, 51, 436-455.
46. Nesbit, J.C., & Adescope, O.O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413-448.
47. Novak, J.D. (1981). Applying learning psychology and philosophy of science to biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 43(1), 12-20.
48. Novak, J.D., & Caas, A.J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them (Tech. Rep.). Pensacola: IHMC Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
49. Novak, J.D., & Gowin, J.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Palys, T. (1992). Research decisions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives (3rd ed.). Toronto, Ontario: Thompson Canada.
51. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52. Poole, D., & Davis, T. (2006). Concept mapping to measure outcomes in a study abroad program. Social Work Education, 25(1), 61-77.
53. Pressley, M., VanEtten, S., Yokoi, L., Freebern, G., & VanMeter, P. (1998). The metacognition of college studentship: A grounded theory approach. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in theory and practice (pp. 347-367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Raymond, A.M. (1997). The use of concept mapping in qualitative research: A multiple case study in mathematics education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(3), 1-28.
55. Rico, G.L. (1983). Writing the natural way: Using right-brain techniques to release your expressive powers. New York Penguin Putnam.
56. Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
57. Rogers, A.E., Day, J., Randall, F., & Bentall, R.P. (2003). A patient's understanding and participation in a trial designed to improve the management of anti-psychotic medication. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 720-727.
58. Rohm, R. (1994). Positive personality profiles. Atlanta, GA: Personality Insights.
59. Rooda, L. (1994) Effects of mind mapping on student achievement in a nursing research course. Nurse Educator, 19(6), 25-27.
60. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.
61. Ruiz-Primo, M., Shavelson, R.J., Li, M., & Schultz, S.E. (2001). On the validity of cognitive interpretations of scores from alternative concept-mapping techniques. Educational Assessment, 7, 99-141.
62. Rye, J.A., & Rubba, P.A. (2002). Scoring concept maps: An expert map-based scheme weighted for relationships. School Science & Mathematics, 102(1), 33-45.
63. Sandelowski, M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 230-240.
64. Safayeni, F., Derbentseva, N., & Cañas, A.J. (2005). A Theoretical Note on Concept Maps and the Need for Cyclic Concept Maps. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 741-766.
65. Schurz, G. (2002). Models of abductive reasoning (TPD Preprints Annual 2002 No. 1). In G. Schurz & M. Werning (Eds.), Philosophical prepublication series of the Chair of Theoretical Philosophy. Düsseldorf, Germany: University of Düsseldorf.
66. Shaw, M., & Dandurand, Y. (Eds.). (2006). Effective technical assistance in crime prevention and criminal justice. Maximizing the effectiveness of the technical assistance provided in the fields of crime prevention and criminal justice (HEUNI Report Series No. 49). Helsinki, Finland: HEUNI.
67. Stewart, J., Van Kirk, J., & Rowell, R. (1979). Concept maps: A tool for use in biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 41, 171-175.
68. Stillwell, W., Winterfeldt, D.V., & John, R.S. (1987). Comparing hierarchical and nonhierarchical weighting methods for eliciting multiattribute value models. Management Science, 33, 442-450.
69. Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J.W. (2008). Mixed methodology across disciplines. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 3-6.
70. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
71. Tattersall, C., Watts, A., & Vernon, S. (2007). Mind mapping as a tool in qualitative research. Nursing Times, 103, 32-33.
72. Tomiyamal, T., Takeda, H., Yoshioka, M., & Shimomura, Y. (2003). Abduction for creative design (AAAI Tech. Rep. No. SS-03-02). Menlo Park, Ca: AAAI Press.
73. Trochim, W. (1989). Concept mapping: Soft science or hard art? Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 87-110.
74. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
75. Turns, J., Atman, C., & Adams, R. (2000). Concept maps for engineering education: A cognitively motivated tool supporting varied assessment functions. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43, 164-173.
76. Way, N., Stauber, H.Y., Nakkula, M.J., & London, P. (1994). Depression and substance use in two divergent high school cultures: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23, 331-357.
77. Wheeldon, J. (2007). Bringing British Columbia to Latvia: Canadians reflect on expert designation in an international criminal justice project. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University.
78. Wheeldon, J. (2008, November). Mapping ethics, values and problem solving among criminal justice students. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.
79. Wheeldon, J. (2009). Mapping international knowledge transfer: Latvian-Canadian cooperation in justice reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
80. Wheeldon, J., & Faubert, J. (2009). Framing experience: Concept maps, mind maps, and data collection in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 68-83.
81. Whorf, B.L. (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.