Visual mismatch negativity to irrelevant changes is sensitive to task-relevant changes

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1277-1282

  Czigler, István ^a   Sulykos, István ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Task background interaction; Top down influences; Visual mismatch negativity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

COLOR PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77949775658     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.029     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anllo-Vento L., Hillyard S.A. Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection. Perception and Psychophysics 1996, 58:191-206.
2. Astikainen P., Lillstarng E., Ruusvirta T. Visual mismatch negativity for changes in orientation - a sensory memory-dependent response. European Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 21:2319-2324.
3. Bahrami B., Lavie N., Rees G. Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli. Current Biology 2007, 17:509-513.
4. Berti S., Schröger E. A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: Behavioral and event-related indices. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 10:265-273.
5. Berti S., Schröger E. Visual distraction: A behavioral and event-related brain potentials study in humans. NeuroReport 2006, 17:151-155.
6. Corral M.-J., Escera C. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction. NeuroReport 2008, 19:1435-1439.
7. Czigler I. Visual mismatch negativity - Violation of nonattended environmental regularities. Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 21:224-230.
8. Czigler I., Balázs L., Winkler I. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual change. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:869-873.
9. Czigler I., Csibra G. Event-related potentials and the identification of deviant visual stimuli. Psychophysiology 1992, 29:471-484.
10. Czigler I., Pato L. Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity. Biological Psychology 2009, 80:339-347.
11. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222.
12. Escera S., Alho K., Winkler I., Näätänen R. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:590-604.
13. Folk C.L., Leber A.B., Egeth H.E. Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:616-642.
14. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
15. Grimm S., Bendixen A., Deouell L.Y., Schröger E. Distraction in a visual multi-deviant paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2009, 10.1010/j.ijosycho.2009.01.005.
16. Heslenfeld D.I. Visual mismatch negativity. Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings 2003, 41-59. Kluver Academic Press, Boston. J. Polich (Ed.).
17. Kimura M., Katayama J., Murohashi H. Attention switching function of memory-comparison-based change detection system in the visual modality. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 67:101-113.
18. Kumada T. Limitations in attending to feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference. Perception and Psychophysics 1999, 61:61-79.
19. Lamy D., Leber A., Egeth H.E. Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:1019-1031.
20. Lavie N. Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:75-82.
21. Martinez-Trujillo J.C., Treue S. Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Current Biology 2004, 14:744-751.
22. McCarthy G., Woods C.C. Scalp distribution of event-related potentials - an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1985, 62:203-208.
23. Müller H.J., Heller D., Ziegler J. Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics 1995, 57:1-17.
24. Müller H.J., Reimann B., Krummenacher J. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:1021-1035.
25. Poiese P., Spalek T.M., Di Lollo V. Attentional capture by salient distractor in visual search: The effect of target-distractor similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 62:233-236.
26. Saenz M., Buracas G.T., Boyton G.M. Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:631-632.
27. Schröger E., Wolff C. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 1998, 7:71-87.
28. Schubö A., Müller H.J. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search. Brain Research 2009, 1283:84-101.
29. Sussman E., Winkler I., Wang W. MMN and attention: Competition for deviance detection. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:430-435.
30. Theeuwes J. Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004, 11:65-70.
31. Yucel G., McCarthy G., Belger A. fMRI reveals that involuntary visual deviance processing is resource limited. NeuroImage 2007, 34:1245-1252.