A correlated probit model for joint modeling of clustered binary and continuous responses

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 96, Issue 455, 2001, Pages 1102-1112

  Gueorguieva, Ralitza V ^a   Agresti, Alan ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Florida ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Generalized linear mixed model; Latent variable; Monte Carlo EM algorithm; Random effect; Teratology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0442327764     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/016214501753208762     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Catalano, P. J., and Ryan, L. M. (1992), “Bivariate Latent Variable Models for Clustered Discrete and Continuous Outcomes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 651–658.
2. Chan, J. S. K., and Kuk, A. Y. C. (1997), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Probit-LinearMixed Models With Correlated Random Effects,” Biometrics, 53, 86–97.
3. Delyon, B., Lavielle M., and Moulines, E. (1999), “On a Stochastic Approximation Version of the EM Algorithm,” The Annals of Statistics, 27, 94–128.
4. Dunson, D. B. (2000), “Bayesian Latent Variable Models for Clustered Mixed Outcomes,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 62, 355–366.
5. Fitzmaurice, G. M., and Laird, N. M. (1995), “Regression Models for a Bivariate Discrete and Continuous Outcome With Clustering,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 845–852.
6. Fitzmaurice, G. M., and Laird, N. M. (1997), “Regression Models for Mixed Discrete and Continuous Responses With Potentially Missing Values,” Biometrics, 53, 110–122.
7. Gueorguieva, R. V. (1999), “Models for Repeated Measures of a Multivariate Response,” Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Dept. of Statistics.
8. Heitjan, D. F., and Sharma, D. (1997), “Modelling Repeated-Series Longitudinal Data,” Statistics in Medicine, 16, 347–355.
9. Lesaffre, E., and Molenberghs, G. (1991), “Multivariate Probit Analysis: A Neglected Procedure in Medical Statistics,” Statistics in Medicine, 10, 1391–1403.
10. Liao, J. (1999), “A Simplified and Accelerated Monte Carlo EM Algorithm With Application to a Hierarchical Mixture Model,” technical report.
11. Liu, C., Rubin, D. B., and Wu, Y. N. (1998), “Parameter Expansion to Accelerate EM: The PX-EM Algorithm,” Biometrika, 85, 755–770.
12. Matsuyama, Y., and Ohashi, Y. (1997), “Mixed Models for Bivariate Response Repeated Measures Data Using Gibbs Sampling,” Statistics in Medicine, 16, 1587–1601.
13. Meng, X. L., and Rubin, D. B. (1993), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation via the ECM Algorithm. A General Framework,” Biometrika, 80, 267–78.
14. Meng, X. L., and van Dyk, D. (1998), “Fast EM-Type Implementations for Mixed Effects Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 60, 559–578.
15. Neuhaus, J. M., Hauck, W. W., and Kalbfleisch, J. D. (1992), “The Effects of Mixture Distribution Misspecification When Fitting Mixed Effects Logistic Models,” Biometrika, 79, 755–762.
16. Price, C. J., Kimmel, C. A., Tyl, R. W., and Marr, M. C. (1985), “The Developmental Toxicity of Ethylene Glycol in Rats and Mice,” Toxicological Applications in Pharmacology, 81, 825–839.
17. Regan, M. M., and Catalano, P. J. (1999), “Likelihood Models for Clustered Binary and Continuous Outcomes: Application to Developmental Toxicology,” Biometrics, 55, 760–768.
18. Rochon, J. (1996), “Analyzing Bivariate Repeated Measures for Discrete and Continuous Outcome Variables,” Biometrics, 52, 740–750.
19. Ruppert, D. (1991), “Stochastic Approximation,” in Handbook of Sequential Analysis, New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 503–529.