Attribute pair-based visual recognition and memory

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Morita, Masahiko ^a   Morokami, Shigemitsu ^b   Morita, Hiromi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b AICHI SHUKUTOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BINOCULAR VISION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, OCULAR;

EID: 77949697885     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009571     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. von der Malsburg C (1981) The correlation theory of brain function. MPI Biophysical Chemistry, Internal Report 81-2. Reprinted. In: Domany E, van Hemmen JL, Schulten K, eds. Models of Neural Networks II. Berlin: Springer (1994). pp 95-119.
2. Treisman A (1996) The binding problem. Curr Opinion Neurobio 6: 171-178.
3. Treisman A, Glede GA (1980) A feature integration theory of attention. Cogn Psych 12: 97-136.
4. Kahneman D, Treisman A, Gibbs BJ (1992) The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cogn Psych 24: 175-219.
5. Treisman A (1999) Solutions to the binding problem: Progress through controversy and convergence. Neuron 24: 105-110.
6. Wolfe JM, Cave KR (1999) The psychophysical evidence for a binding problem in human vision. Neuron 24: 11-17.
7. Reynolds JH, Desimone R (1999) The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem. Neuron 24: 19-29.
8. O'Craven K, Downing P, Kanwisher N (1999) fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401: 584-587.
9. Holcombe AO, Cavanagh P (2001) Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception. Nat Neurosci 4: 127-128.
10. Mitchell JF, Stoner GR, Reynolds JH (2004) Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature 429: 410-413.
11. Luck SJ, Vogel EK (1997) The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390: 279-281.
12. Olson IR, Jiang Y (2002) Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the "strong-object" hypothesis. Percept Psychophys 64: 1055-1067.
13. Alvarez GA, Cavanagh P (2004) The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol Sci 15: 106-111.
14. Davis G, Holmes A (2005) The capacity of visual short-term memory is not a fixed number of objects. Mem Cognit 33: 185-195.
15. Singer W, Gray CM (1995) Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosc 18: 555-586.
16. Shadlen MN, Movshon JA (1999) Synchrony unbound: A critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24: 67-77.
17. Blake R, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 13-23.
18. McLean JP, Broadbent DE, Broadbent MH (1983) Combining attributes in rapid serial visual presentation tasks. Quart J Exp Psychol 35A: 171-186.
19. Hopfield JJ (1984) Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81: 3088-3092.
20. Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, Sheinberg DL (1996) What is rivaling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380: 621-624.
21. Lee SH, Blake R (1999) Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Res 39: 1447-1454.
22. Bonneh Y, Sagi D, Karni AA (2001) Transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Res 41: 981-989.
23. Wolfe JM, Cave KR, Franzel SL (1989) Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15: 419-433.
24. Blaser E, Pylyshyn ZW, Holcombe AO (2000) Tracking an object through feature space. Nature 408: 196-199.
25. Kanwisher N, Wojciulik E (2000) Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging. Nat Rev Neurosc 1: 91-100.
26. Naya Y, Sakai K, Miyashita Y (1996) Activity of primate inferotemporal neurons related to a sought target in pair-association task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 2664-2669.
27. Suemitsu A, Morita M (2006) Neural network model of context-dependent neuronal activity in inferotemporal cortex. Proc IJCNN' 06: 293-298.